The situation in India is increasingly dangerous and authoritarian: the governing BJP party in Uttar Pradesh enacted a law which gives the state unconscionable powers to prevent and punish inter-faith marriages.

Why? Because they back a conspiracy theory known as 'love jihad'.
This conspiracy theory, that there's a nefarious scheme to force the conversion of Hindu girls to Islam through marriage is patently absurd. For as long as India has been a multifaith country, there have been mixed marriages and conversions - my own family amongst them!
My grandmother (Hindu, now Muslim) married my grandfather (Muslim), my mother (Muslim) married my father (Hindu). No forced conversions, no jihad, just people enjoying their freedom to love - and subsequently divorce - who they like.
But this 'love jihad' law means that anyone who wants to change faiths has to apply to a government official 60 days in advance of their wedding so the police can investigate first, and the state retains the power to declare both marriages and conversions null and void.
What's more, conversions deemed 'fraudulent' or 'false' can now be punished with 10 years in prison in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

But who gets to decide whether a conversion is legitimate or not? Not the bride, who (if Hindu) is presumed to have no agency in the matter.
Because the burden of proof is on those who facilitated the conversation, including the spouse, to prove it *wasn't* coerced (how do you even do that?), power rests with those who disapprove of the match, whether that's family, the community, or extremist groups.
This law is unconstitutional, Islamophobic, and sexist - it treats Hindu women as property of the state, with no agency of their own. It undermines one of the most fundamental rights we have: to love who we choose and to choose our own faith.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ash Sarkar

Ash Sarkar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AyoCaesar

20 Oct
Putting aside the fact that they’re engines of class inequality, private boarding schools are just intensely fucked up places to send your children. It is just so intensely damaging.
I never met people who went to boarding school until uni, and it was honesty mad hearing what went on. All the things that made their parents mistrust the state system (bullying, violence, substance abuse) were not only endemic at these boarding schools, they were inescapable.
You’re sending your kid into that environment when they’re like 11, and putting them into the care of people who - no matter how well intentioned - don’t love them. What kind of message does that send to your child about how you feel about them?
Read 6 tweets
10 Aug
Keir Starmer is weak on tackling institutional racism, imo, because he’s scared to further alienate voters who felt Corbyn was weak on law and order. The gamble is that BAME voters don’t have anywhere else to go on Election Day.

The problem is, we can always stay home.
Starmer doesn’t have to stop being who he is to get better at this stuff.

All that “I’m a sir and a QC, I’m not scruffy, I’ve met the Queen” thing could actually make him a decent broker between two bits of the Labour coalition who have very different experiences of policing.
You can talk about policing both in terms of injustice and ineffectiveness when it comes to addressing the root causes of violent crime. You can talk about the recommended criminal justice reforms in the Lammy report. Talk about fairness and equality before the law.
Read 4 tweets
8 Aug
Dunno if there’s a problem in Labour with race. All I know is that a staffer briefed a Sunday Times journo that I’d flounced out of HQ in disgust when the 2019 exit polls came out.

Small problem... I wasn’t even there. They’d just seen an entirely different brown woman.
The journalist in question took down the tweet as soon as they’d been made aware of the fact that, when I was meant to be storming around Southside I’d been doing a livestream at Novara HQ. Which is good! But I think that microevent speaks to a culture in the party bureaucracy.
And it’s one where disdain for the left overlaps with, and is amplified by, racism. Because the target of your ire is a factional opponent, little thought is given to your own blindspots or personal bigotries, and those things get even more entrenched.
Read 4 tweets
17 Jul
Thread incoming, and heads up for those who need it, there's racist and sexually abusive language in the screenshots to follow.

But basically, yesterday's brush with the sticky floor of the internet got me thinking a lot about how porn shapes the language of online...
... and how we don't really have honest conversations about it.

My approach to this stuff is generally anti-censorship, pro-workers rights, and regulation should focus on consent, age, and workplace conditions.
And that's very much still the case. But from having to go through various uses of my image captioned and commented with degrading material, it was striking how much of the language (generally at the intersection of 'racist' and 'horny') overlapped with the register of Pornhub.
Read 15 tweets
15 Jul
A little note on 'cancel culture', and why its origins aren't always what you'd think. A couple of weeks ago a radio producer got in touch to ask me about a particular podcast character by @DaftLimmy, from a series he did about 14/15 years ago.
The reason why the producer got in touch with me was because one of the characters voiced by Limmy was Vijay, the son of a cornershop owner who narrates his deliveries and the people he comes across.
While Limmy subtly augments his normal speech, it's not an 'Apu' kind of accent, but the kind of gentle emphasis on plosives which often characterises second generation South Asians in the UK (one of those 'you know it when you hear it' kind of things).
Read 13 tweets
10 Jul
Most of those complaining about being cancelled are not only exceptionally wealthy, but well ensconced in national broadcast and print media.

It's not only that their freedom of expression isn't under attack - they have bigger and more powerful platforms than 99% of people.
Is all criticism from the left fair, in good faith, even-handed? No. But speaking as someone who recently got death threats from the right over a selfie with an ice lolly (and called an antisemite for asking about kosher salt), I don't think those traits are unique to the left.
I don't think 'cancel culture' is a particularly useful way to think about how social media has changed values-driven political conflict and/or accountability. It's imprecise, encompasses everything from calling for someone to be sacked to getting ratio'd.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!