People have a right to choose what feels safest for them. Moreover, they have a right to be safe: a congregate setting, being placed in a shelter-hotel alone with a stranger isn't safe. Declare a moratorium on #encampment evictions.
Shelter-hotels should also not be allowed to service restrict residents and turn them out on to the street. If the goal is indeed to bring people into "safe, indoor spaces" as the City claims, then keep them indoors. Provide what folks need to feel and be safe once they're there.
The criminal justice system has more of a process with people than homelessness services that are unaccountable for when they turn people outside, and even restrict them for a week, a year — sometimes "for life," meaning no end date.
Again, even in the criminal justice system, "life" is a finite time frame of 25 years. Why do we not have a process or accountability with homelessness services who restrict people without consequence indefinitely? Restrictions can kill people.
Just again to speak to this notion of "safe, indoor space" — this is a piece that often goes under the radar: that individual providers in homelessness services can enact restrictions that disallow people from coming indoors, sometimes indefinitely. That is never safe.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Toronto Drop-in Network (TDIN)

Toronto Drop-in Network (TDIN) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TODropinNetwork

6 Dec
🔎FACTS: We did some digging! Central Intake (CI) fields an avg. of 377 calls a day. Unfortunately, we only know the reason underlying 308 of these calls. This is because CI operators forgot to record the reason why someone was calling for 18% of all calls coming into CI. 🤫
Of these 308 calls, 22% were "referrals" — someone who has called for a bed and is considered "en route" to a shelter. A person can only be referred once per day, so each of these phone calls — 22% of 308 is 68 — represents one individual (68 individuals).
However, we also know that by 4 am, 38 of those 68 people never made it to their shelter bed. This means that an average of 56% of everyone referred to a shelter bed never gets there (for a host of different reasons, including transit barriers).
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!