Interesting piece on the geography of farmer suicides in India. Looks like Punjab and Mizoram are the two states where farmer suicides in 2018 surpassed the overall suicide rate. What's driving this?

livemint.com/news/india/the…
"In the analysis of farmer suicides between 1997 and 2012, the researchers argue that farmer suicides are a result of three broad factors, including existing vulnerability in a region, agrarian crisis, and lack of alternative opportunities."
Looks like farmer suicides in Punjab are concentrated in the Malwa region, where land is primarily is leased by "small and marginal farmers" (i.e. holdings of 1-5 acres)

indianexpress.com/article/explai…
"Of the farmers who committed suicide, 43.84 per cent were marginal farmers (having upto 1 hectare land), 30.12 per cent were small farmers (having upto 2 hectares), 18 per cent were semi-medium farmers (having land upto 2.5 hecatres)"
The primary cause of farmer suicides is-- predictably-- farm debt, caused in party by high land leasing costs:

"In Malwa, the number of ‘landless’ and ‘marginal farmers’ is very high against the availability of farmland..
Cultivation of land is the only way available to them to earn their living. For taking land on rent, they are dependent on big land lords and ‘sahukaars’ (private money lenders), who have also become owners of agricultural lands of most small and marginal farmers,
who could not pay their debts and finally transfer their lands to these lenders,” said BKU Ugrahan General Secretary Sukhdev Singh Kokrikalan."
"In the Malwa region, a large number of farmers have to spend a chunk of their earnings on health issues including cancer, which is quite common here.... Several reasons have been attributed to high number of cancer patients here, including highly contaminated groundwater."
This piece by Gaurav Bansal on the inequalities of Punjab's agricultural economy is also an eye-opener.

frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/pun…
"In 2002-03, Punjab had the highest inequality in rural land ownership; the gini-coefficient was 0.82, compared to the Indian average of 0.75. (The gini coefficient is a measure of inequality varying between 0, implying perfect equality, and 1, which implies highest inequality).
This inequality in the ownership of land has been widening only in the last few decades. The inequality is starker in the case of operational holdings because rich farmers in Punjab have almost entirely captured the land lease in market by leasing in land from all sources,
including from small and marginal landowners, termed as 'reverse tenancy'"
"Thus, while the Green Revolution enhanced incomes of the landed Jat Sikhs—along with the merchants commission agents who predominantly come from Bania and Khatri castes— Dalits and the rural poor have largely been excluded from the prosperity. Dalits,
who earlier used to lease in small parcels of land, experienced widespread evictions in the 1970s and 1980s, which still continues. High land prices and rental rate for leasing in land continue to act as formidable barriers for Dalits in accessing land."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vishal Ganesan

Vishal Ganesan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @vjgtweets

3 Dec
This is a super interesting conversation, between @srajagopalan and @adam_m_auerbach about slum politics in India
"Interestingly, statistically speaking, in terms of an association, I find a positive association between ethnic diversity and public-goods provision. I think the mechanism through which this happens is that ethnic diversity tends to fragment leadership,
particularly in the beginning stages of a settlement. There are simply more nodes of informal authority with which parties can then extend positions. It intensifies this competition among the slum leaders themselves."
Read 5 tweets
3 Dec
I was in Rome a few years ago visiting a friend and I would often stop at this cafe near his place to grab a coffee before I'd embark on touristy things. One day the barista asked me where in America I was from.
I told her I was from Phoenix (not really true, but that's where my parents are), and she asked if we could switch places because she was bored of Rome. That was the day I went to the ara pacis and the villa borghese, both amazing.
I couldn't get her words out of my head. Why the hell would anyone want to trade the beauty, food, and history of Rome for endless suburbs and 120 degree summers? This was pre-Trump, so I don't know if it's still the case, but a good reminder that despite all of its flaws,
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
If you've been following the India reportage in western media over the past year, you would expect the BJP to be in a vulnerable position following the "nation-wide, grassroots" protests against the "fascist" CAA, alleged mismanagement of pandemic, etc

livemint.com/elections/asse…
But assembly elections in Bihar (pop ~100m, and home to the bulk of migrant workers) just wrapped and the verdict was clear: The BJP/Modi are as popular as ever. A timely reminder that self-proclaimed "South Asia" experts are selling you a mental model of a country and a people.
And like any other model, you can test it against the available data to see if it fits. Spoiler alert: it does not. So as you see the divergence between the model and data grow, you are left with two choices:
Read 6 tweets
9 Nov
One of the interesting things about the America-India relationship is witnessing the intersection of two peculiar national pathologies of "exceptionalism." American exceptionalism is messianic, which simultaneously endows it with a brazen confidence and a
relentless outward gaze to whatever is next. The default assumption is that America's founding represents a fundamental break with the past, and therefore the laws of history don't apply to us. OTOH, Indian exceptionalism is inward looking and obsessed with the past.
Indians are convinced that the world revolves around them, and as a result every global event is interpreted through a provincial lens. Each has its pros and cons: America moves fast and breaks things, which gives its people immense creative energy,
Read 6 tweets
1 Nov
Just watched Shithouse. Great movie. Revisiting freshman year music.
Read 5 tweets
1 Nov
An excellent point by @esaagar. Opposing hindutva is one thing, but treating it as a lunatic fringe is simply inaccurate, and a rhetorical ploy often used to justify reductive, bigoted attacks against hindus, under the guise of opposing "hindutva, not hinduism"
When you claim that BJP supporters are all fascists/extremists, you're not referring (as you might imagine) to a small cabal of elite conspirators, but ~300m Indians-- many of whom are poor and "low" caste-- who support the BJP and subscribe to its ideology.
That's almost the entire population of America! Now, if you think that they're _all_ irredeemable fascists, then please just say so. Alternatively, consider the fact that maybe your understanding of an emergent political phenomenon in another country whose ascendance is
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!