I’m so angry about this ‘haute Remain is responsible for hard Brexit’ bullshit. When I stood for Parliament in 2017, I stood in hustings and said ‘Brexit is happening. We demand the Government deliver on the promise of no down-side, and the Opposition hold them accountable’.
Neither of those things happened. For four years, the Governments of May and Johnson have at best negotiated in bad faith and at worst actively pursued no deal. They gaslight us constantly that this is ‘the will of the people’, when anyone not insane or punch drunk can see that
... for what it is, the ERG’s Reichstag Fire. As for the Opposition, the decision of Jeremy Corbyn not to hold the government accountable for five years was catastrophically damaging. It handed the role of opposition to hard nationalists within and without the Tory Party.
That is why the ERG set the agenda during the May premiership, and why, despite an 80 seat majority for the Tories, they still seem to hold sway. It is why the Nationalists in Scotland will succeed in Secession (or Scexit - let’s call it what it is, not ‘Independence’).
Now, at the 11th hour, we endure accusations from such diverse luminaries as Peter Mandelson and Owen Jones that this was, somehow, our fault? We, who did nothing but demand that politicians live up to their promises. Well fuck absolutely every single one of them.
Here is who is responsible for Brexit: (1) David Cameron, for his casual hubris of lobbing the constitutional hand-grenade of a referendum into the marketplace with no intention of delivering on the outcome that won, or preparation whatsoever for that outcome.
It is impossible to overstate how damaging and arrogant that was. Just two years after almost losing Scotland, for that man arrogantly to assume things would go his way to the point where not a single thought was given to him losing is unforgivable.
Because Brexit was born of a fever dream. It was never a serious political project. It was simply a way for the United Kingdom’s various enemies like Putin, Farage and Sturgeon to attack the body politic for their own game. It was the vessel carrying all political lunacy.
So from the very beginning, Cameron’s failure to say ‘this is Brexit. This is what it is. This is your free choice between the status quo and this possible future’ made Brexit the maelstrom of lies it became.
(2) Theresa May. Her disastrous premiership, a two-year parade of errors, self-defeating idiocy and wasted time that left the EU unable to negotiate because their negotiating partner had collapsed into a failed state. The set herself a deadline to trigger article 50.
And triggered it. Again, like Cameron, she made this catastrophic, unforced error purely with her eyes turned inwardly to the Tory Party, despite the fact it made the country a hostage to fortune and shot us in the leg in EU negotiations.
(3) Jeremy Corbyn. A man who time and time again whipped his MPs to vote with the worst Tory government this country has ever seen, led by the Windrush Scandal Prime Minister, without an ounce of true opposition or holding the government to account. If the referendum fatally
undermined UK democracy, this was the coup de grace. Without an opposition to hold it to account, no government can avoid the descent into madness and factionalism.
(4) The dysfunctional British media environment we might call the ‘Murdochracy’, where Murdoch and Beaverbrook set the agenda and the BBC follows, supine. Where else could the fever dream of Brexit flourish if not in the stinking swamp of the British media, who emerged from
Leveson unscathed, and swiftly took their revenge on Cameron. Where the British people sought news and information, they found lies, fantasy and delusion, spoonfed to them by the most corrupt element of our corrupt public life.
How could British citizens even begin to monitor sensibly the progress of a complex and difficult negotiation for their country’s future when served a non-stop diet of jingoistic drivel?
(5) The Vote Leave and LeaveDotEu campaigns, whose corruption, lies and illegality has been exposed by brave whistleblowers @shahmiruk, @chrisinsilico and by one of the UK’s few remaining journalists @carolecadwalla to precisely no legal consequence, advancing the career of
The criminal Dominic Cummings. Which brings us to the next in our list: The Conservative Party. And now you start to see a theme. If the first part of our story was that of disgusting, craven, incompetent individuals, the second is that of corrupt institutions rewarding corrupt
Corruption. The Conservative Party has become a machine not just for systemic political corruption, but for denigrating the very basis of grrr, fair, open, democratic societies respecting the rule of law. How could any Brexit have been negotiated under such people?
Thus the Conservative Party became a cancer in our body politic. And that is what Johnson, Gove, Raab, Patel, Hancock, Williamson, Grayling, Sunak and all the others are: nothing more than the toxic tendrils of the malignant rumour itself.
You might plausibly add to this list. But who deserves no place on it whatsoever are those people, like me, a huge number of people across this land, who have warned about all of this from the very beginning, and who have been silenced with the lie that we did not accept the vote
That we were trying to overturn the will of the people or reverse the referendum. For four years, we have taken that abuse as part of the cut and thrust of politics, a sad irony that those who would fight for democracy and the rule of law would be so painted by its true enemies.
But we will not endure this. We will not take the blame for this. We, who have done nothing but warn of this disaster and demand it be prevented will not bear the blame for it coming to pass. They have done this. Now we must rebuild.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Marshall

Peter Marshall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marshall_proEU

26 Mar
Never has anyone complained about aggressive questioning of the other side. Nothing could be more sinister than this attempt to undermine journalistic scrutiny and accountability. It is quite simply how democracies work. This bullshit will be drip-fed to us to soften us.
Notice how it’s all the journalist’s fault for asking the question? Not the politician’s for failing to answer clearly, and honestly. Same applies to Opposition: how dare the Opposition question the government at a time like this? It’s political point-scoring.
The entire logic of our free and democratic system relies on a loyal opposition having not just the right, but the responsibility to oppose, for by doing so, they provide the whetstone for effective government, which is otherwise dulled by inefficiency or corruption.
Read 6 tweets
27 Dec 19
Cast your mind back to the Vox Pops done in the days after the Brexit result. Remember those people who were jubilant because it meant we “could get rid of them now”. Get rid of the ‘Muslims’. And the ‘scroungers’ and the ‘bogus asylum seekers’. Think about those people.
Why did they think what they did? Why do they still think it now? Because no-one, not one peron with authority in politics or journalism has stood up for the benefits of immigration or multiculturalism since 2005 at the very latest.
I choose 2005, because it marked the departure of the Tories under Michael Howard for their ‘you don’t have to be racist to vote Tory, but it helps’ campaign under Amanda Platell and Lynton Crosby. Hardcore Australian white nationalism thought dead in this country since the 70’s.
Read 11 tweets
17 Sep 19
Here’s why the @LibDems and @RenewParty are right to favour revoking Art. 50 before a People’s Vote. Those advocating doing it the other way around are making two major mistakes THREAD.
The first mistake is the more unforgivable, and that is failing to learn the lesson of last time. This is the error Cameron made after the Scottish referendum. That mistake is the assumption that revoke would win. This is related to the second mistake....
...and that is the degree of damage already done to the public sphere in this country, including to democracy itself. It is becoming increasingly clear that it would be impossible to hold a free and fair vote. Referendums are inherently damaging to U.K. representative democracy.
Read 10 tweets
6 Aug 19
The "no-go" zones of London are part of the right-wing mythology to make Londoners strange people, who would rather live in a crime-ridden "Londonistan" than in "true" Britain. It helps alienate us both as a suspect "metropolitan elite" and cosmopolitan "citizens of nowhere".
Every time Farage says "metropolitan elite" and Hopkins says "Sadiq Khan's London", they're saying the same thing: Londoners are not "really" British, and are either a feral, criminal underclass, or a subversive, decadent elite. The false image of "no-go zones" is part of that.
What could feed the "Europe is fallen" narrative better than to say that her citizens and agents of the state literally cannot enter areas effectively annexed by criminals and / or immigrants? It's a total fiction, but like all fake news, ruthlessly effective.
Read 7 tweets
2 Aug 19
Something has occurred to me about all the Bunting Britain ‘blitz spirit’, Dunkirk nonsense about the memory of the war, now that generation is passing. Three of my grandparents served, and the other was maimed as a munitions worker. Obviously, I’m full of regret now ... 1/n
that they are all gone that I didn’t interview them relentlessly about it. One grandmother’s career lifted off as a very young woman, taking her into the Civil Service and transforming her life. One grandfather was a Royal Engineer in North Africa and Europe. 2/n
But for all that, the first-hand knowledge they imparted was little. True, I was very young, but one common experience everyone will tell you is how difficult they all found it to talk about. How little they said, especially to young children. 3/n
Read 16 tweets
22 Jun 19
In Munich, there is a museum about the city’s relationship with the Nazi Party, particularly in its early years. I visited last year. Two themes stood out and struck me. 1/n...
The first thing is how German nationalism was profoundly anti-German. Early Nazi propaganda in Munich emphasised Bavarian separatism, and pushing a culture war between “true” “traditionalist” German values, and corrupt, metropolitan Berlin.
The second was a photograph by an American journalist of a Jewish lawyer being paraded through the streets of the city by the SA in around ‘32, 33. Very early in the Hitler regime.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!