@Ionsancho1 RBG/1 Bush v Gore
Justice Ginsburg's dissent asserting state's rights opposing the Chief Justice/conservative opinion claiming violation of equal protection flipped modern political philosophy on its head.
This was the give away of serious mischief.
RBG's writing gave clues:
@Ionsancho1 RBG/2 BvG
instead of respecting the state high court’s province to say what the State’s Election Code means, The Chief Justice maintains that Florida’s Supreme Court has veered so far from the ordinary practice of judicial review that what it did cannot properly be called judging
@Ionsancho1 RBG/3 BvG
..disagreement with the Florida court’s interpretation of its own State’s law does not warrant the conclusion that the justices of that court have legislated. ..and no cause to upset their reasoned interpretation of Florida law.