Federal courts continue to have to lecture Trump’s allies on basic legal concepts.
Just brutal. The 11th Cir. is just going through all the ways Trump ally L. Lin Wood shot his own election-fraud case in the face.
Again, these are lawsuits being brought by people running around claiming that they are the biggest, most consequential cases ever filed in our democracy. Some are being brought by the president himself.

But they're getting shot down left and right over stupid, basic stuff.
The 11th Cir.'s ruling that Wood lacks standing means this case is done, an ex-case.
Arizona officials would like the judge in the local Kraken case to see how badly L. Lin Wood's case was stomped by the 11th Cir.

In addition to being the plaintiff in the now-stomped Georgia case, they note Wood is one of the attorneys of record in the far-fetched Arizona one.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brad Heath

Brad Heath Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bradheath

7 Dec
Sidney Powell told a judge it's important for the Department of Defense to get access to Georgia's voting machines.
The judge is basically sitting there while she goes through the stack of "expert" testimony that's been introduced in the case.
... and then the judge comes back to the actual legal questions of standing and why this case belongs in federal court, and he sounds pretty skeptical about all that and says Powell has been "glib" with her claims about binding precedent.
Read 9 tweets
7 Dec
The federal court order in MI ending Sidney Powell & Co.'s request to overturn the election results there methodically shreds all of their claims. They lose on every single issue - the case is moot, was filed too late, they have no standing, etc.

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Image
The judge deals very briefly with the merits of these Kraken claims. The plaintiffs offered "nothing but speculation and conjecture." Image
Judge: Sidney Powell's election lawsuit in Mich. "seems to be less about achieving the result the Plaintiffs seek ... and more about the impact of their allegations on the People's faith in the democratic process."

"The people have spoken."

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Image
Read 4 tweets
6 Dec
As Trump leaves Georgia, where he complained about fictional election fraud, the state weighed in on a lawsuit seeking to overturn the election. "These claims would be extraordinary if true, but they are not." Image
The state has filed lots of pages, but this is probably the only one it really needs. The 11th Cir. bounced a similar suit today because plaintiffs lacked standing. That decision binds the district court here. Image
Georgia: "There is no credible evidence to support the drastic and unprecedented remedy of substituting certified presidential election results with the Plaintiff's preferred candidate."

The filing is by Georgia's Republican AG on behalf of its Republican governor and others. Image
Read 18 tweets
4 Dec
Meanwhile in Wisconsin, the state Supreme Court won't allow a conservative group to file a new challenge to the results of the election Trump lost there. Image
There's a concurrence from Justice Hagedorn, a frequent swing vote, expressing dismay at overturning an election. "We are invited to invalidate the entire presidential election in Wisconsin by declaring it “null”—yes, the whole thing." Image
Hagedorn's concurrence probably doesn't bode well for President Trump's own state lawsuit in Wisconsin that also seeks to invalidate the results of the presidential election he lost.
Read 5 tweets
4 Dec
A Nevada state court just shot down Trump's effort to overturn the election he lost there. The plaintiffs "failed to meet their burden to provide credible and relevant evidence to substantiate any" of their claims.

democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… Image
The judge said a lot of the Trump electors' evidence was inadmissible because it was hearsay and was submitted in the form of written declarations. But the judge considers it anyway and Trump still loses. Image
The judge didn't trust Trump's experts. Image
Read 8 tweets
4 Dec
Trump's lawyer to a federal judge just now: "It's been a long time since my civil procedure class."
The judge asks why, if Trump's lawyers say only the legislature can redress violations of the Electors Clause, are we here at all? Why didn't you just ask them?

Judge: "I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court."
Judge Ludwig: Trump's request to have the case remanded to the state legislature is "a little bizarre."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!