I’ve come to see the accuracy in Hughes’ main point (though Archer raises some good objections on secondary ones). ‘Islamic studies’ in the US seems more and more like the establishment’s immune response to ‘the Islamic threat’: ...
2. ... with actual Muslim scholars cowed into silence, the academy yields a crop of ‘progressive’ Muslim profs who teach a deconstructed Islam for the world’s urban progressive elite. ...
3. ... This replacement clergy may rail against the system (and I agree with many of these points and rail along with them), but no more than any other committed, activist prof. Their Muslimness, their theism, their connection to Tradition has been squeezed out of existence. ...
4.There are certainly exceptions (I’d name them but don’t want to toxify them), but many I’ve seen actually despise their own religion. They argue with passion that it never really existed. Exactly what students need to see for the immune response to work. Muslim problem solved.
5. What I’m have to say impresses me is how this socio-biological machinery works. It doesn’t need a plan because the carrots and sticks, the predilections and secret fears of the academy, philanthropy, state and media are all long established.
6. The 2007 Rand report on “Building Moderate Muslim Networks” reads less like a plan and more like a description of how our state/society was always going to handle this ‘problem.’
7. Hughes does not come at this from my POV, but where we meet is that neither of us thinks the academy is a place for saying which understanding of religion is correct. I do that in my off hours!...
8. I’ve heard of a prominent prof who taught students all about “Islam & lgbtq” but never taught them the massive, massive majority view of Islamic tradition or Muslims worldwide on the topic/s. ...
9. How are those students being well educated by such a selective, effectively prescriptive view? Ok time to check how many chocolate chips I have in the fridge.
10. Btw I think it’s great for Muslim profs to “do theology” in books and talks and even to put on that hat in class occasionally, but that should be distinct from their academic publication and teaching.
11. And also btw I stand fully behind the *academic* quality of all my Yaqeen writings.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sectarianism (Sunni-Shiah discord) is a sickness. Please don’t indulge it or engage in it. If you want to talk politics, talk politics. If you want to do hadith v. Ra’y, do it. اذكروا الله و رسوله صلى الله عليه Have mercy on your brothers and sisters.
Someone asked if this is related to the desecration of the grave of Umar II (rA). It’s not. I only just heard of this. It just makes it all the more important not to get sucked in to the pit of sectarianism...
... Unless Shiah worldwide or even a big part of them support the desecration (which I’m willing to go out and a limb and guess not), blaming them is no different from blaming Sunnis for ISIS.
[Threaded]: Someone asked me to summarize the "Islamic studies" debate that happened. There were 4 intertwined debates...
1) Textualism/old-school philology vs. other disciplines like anthro and religious studies (aka 'Do you need to know Arabic?)
2) 'theory' vs. text/old school philology (otherwise known as do you need to know Arabic AND literary theory or is literary theory a Western construct not useful for Arabic bla bla)
@shahanSean San'a: what do you get the (non-Yemeni) man who has everything? What every Yemeni man has: a jambiyya! (jambiyya belt sold separately) (shot from San'a market, 2007)
@shahanSean [Break from Yemen]: Interesting photo from a bookstore in Dupont Circle, Washington DC, July 2019
@shahanSean Yemen: inventive advertising in the San'a market (2007)