1. A quick little riff on remote work in light of all the news speculation about finance/ VC moving to Miami etc etc etc.
2. First, I think that the BIG geographic impact of the pandemic will be more on the geography of where we work than where we live.
3. I think remote work has several different implications ...
4. Looks to me like the share of remote workers seems to be stabilizing at about 20% of the workforce, of course virtually all professional workers
5. The remote workers who will relocate away from cities or to new metros are mainly those with families or forming families.
6. These folks have long relocated away from cities. But in the past they were tied to nearby suburbs. Now they can move to more further flung metros.
7. But young people will continue to be drawn to cities, for opportunity. And they will locate there even if they can remote work.
8. Lots of college students moved back to college towns this year, out of dorms to apartments, even when classes were on-line.
9. Younger people will want to meet other people, socialize etc. So cities will also capture some share of remote workers.
10. Communities like Tulsa which have been very intentional in attracting remote workers will also gain.
11. But there is another smaller fraction of remote workers - super high net worth people who work in finance, VC, tech and real estate. Who can move to locations like South Florida and save a bundle on taxes.
12. Their talent base and companies typically remain near entirely in NY or the Bay Area. But these folks can game the system by homesteading in Florida and avoiding state & local income taxes.
13. Very little "work" has moved. Only the residence of the owner ...
14. The fiscal implications of this for superstar cities are prerty big, because their revenue models are tied to high net worth owners. So the fiscal hit from a very small number of relocations is high.
15. My hunch is the biggest impact of remote work is on the central business districts of cities. These will take a big hit - 20%? 30%? reduction? My guess is something like that.
16. Those CBDs will undergo sweeping transformation, hopefully as some of that office space is transformed into more affordable housing.
17. The biggest implication I see tho is that the revenue models of US cities which were based on the colocation of work and residence are going to need some serious rethinking ... End of rant ...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. @CharlottadcM was able to get very fine-grained and unique data on the geographic spread & variation of COVID-19 across Swedish cities (municipalities) and neighborhoods (34 of them in Sweden's 3 largest cities).
3. Sweden makes a useful case study because it did not implement a lockdown or have regional variations in public health policies that might impact the geographic spread of COVID-19 in some locations versus others.
2. The paper by an LSE team looks at the outbreak & spread of COVID-19 across 1197 US counties which comprise 82% of US counties.
3. It uses several measures of density, including simple density and population-weighted density, and adds an instrumental variable based on geological conditions.
1. On these end of city takes that seem to endlessly proliferate: several things strike me. I’ll just state them out here.
2. The first is how they always center around just to cities New York City and San Francisco, even as places like LA or Miami or Houston have been very hard hit by COVID-19.
3. The second is how particularly American they are. There is virtually no conversation or sense that Toronto is at dearth’s door.
1. Pod schools, which parents are turning to because of the utter dysfunction of America’s response to the COVID-19 crisis, will not only exacerbate socioeconomic inequality, they will exacerbate spatial inequality, reinforcing winner take all urbanism.
2. The conventional line in the main stream media is that the Covid crisis is causing families to massively abandon cities. Almost every week we see another set of stories about rich New Yorkers fleeing to the Hamptons or the Hudson Valley.
3. Vacation getaway homes are great in the summer, but there’s a reason they are summer homes. Because they lack the social infrastructure of big cities which many of the residents depend on.