Another Trump NV election contest lawsuit update -- campaign is moving to disqualify Justice James Hardesty from participating in case
Here's the actual motion, where the Trump campaign is attempting to disqualify Justice Hardesty from NV election contest lawsuit because he congratulated the @NVSOS on carrying out an "extraordinarily successful election."
beta.documentcloud.org/documents/2042…
Here is Justice Hardesty's response to the Trump campaign's motion to disqualify him from the election contest lawsuit in Nevada - says his comments to @NVSOS was "an appropriately courteous and professional response and in no way reflects any predisposition or opinion by me."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Riley Snyder

Riley Snyder Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RileySnyder

9 Dec
Just in: NV Supreme Court denies Trump campaign appeal of election contest lawsuit. Story soon @TheNVIndy
@TheNVIndy Here is the filing - unanimous ruling
beta.documentcloud.org/documents/2042…
@TheNVIndy From ruling: "To prevail on this appeal, appellants must demonstrate error of law, findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence, or an abuse of discretion in the admission or rejection of evidence by the district court...We are not convinced they have done so."
Read 4 tweets
9 Dec
If you're still following for updates on the Trump election contest lawsuit in Nevada;

Attorneys for the Trump campaign + Dems have a 7 p.m. deadline to submit supplemental briefs to the state Supreme Court.

Any filings will be posted here:
caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseVie…
Will there be a decision tonight?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

But the fact court asked for supplemental brief after hours is maybe a good sign for a ruling tonight - Ds want decision today (safe harbor deadline) and GOP wants to fully brief case/decision next week
Both the Trump campaign and Dems have filed supplemental briefs by the 7 p.m. deadline.
Read 5 tweets
7 Dec
Tuesday is the "safe harbor" deadline, a key date where "states must certify results if they want protection under federal election law against Congress stepping in to decide which candidate gets their electoral votes."
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil… via @ZoeTillman
In Nevada, the Trump campaign has filed a notice of appeal with Carson City District Court after its lawsuit seeking to block certification/switch NV's 6 electoral votes to Trump were rejected by Judge James Russell on Friday
thenevadaindependent.com/article/judge-…
We're waiting for the actual appeal itself to be filed with the state Supreme Court, which will likely happen at some point today and ask for an expedited decision before the end of Tuesday
Read 4 tweets
3 Dec
I'll be covering the 1:30 p.m. hearing on the Trump campaign's lawsuit (Law v. Whitmer) seeking to block NV's presidential results or have the state's 6 electoral votes assigned to President Trump.

Livestream link here:
Judge James Russell is in the court, we're getting underway
Judge Russell says "It is important for all Americans to have confidence that their governmental officials have conducted a fair open and free election."
Read 77 tweets
3 Dec
How it feels coming back from vacation to immediately jump into coverage of the Economic Forum -->
(Follow @MichelleRindels and I for updates)
#EconomicForum update - state's Department of Taxation estimates that it will take until 2022 at earliest for state's sales/use tax to recover to pre-pandemic levels. (Sales/use is the largest tax source for state budget)
Read 8 tweets
20 Nov
Sturman: You are asking, as a preliminary matter to throw out 1,400,000 votes on the chance that somewhere around 258 people voted who should not have
Sturman says she's "really struggling" with idea of throwing out the election, says doing so would cause "very serious harm to public, disenfranchising the 1.4 million people who did vote....and the public interest is keeping people in office.
Sturman says she does not see herself granting a preliminary injunction based on the record.

"The civil remedy of throwing out an election is just a shocking ask."
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!