This is notable — and a key marker for those who say Trump’s actions help China: The Chinese embassy in the US has retweeted Trump’s fake claim of election fraud. For autocrats, Trump is helping delegitimize democracy and eroding US standing. Putin has repeated his arguments too.
2. It’ll be interesting to see if Chinese and Russian officials and media outlets also start amplifying the statements of Republican officials, including members of Congress, who support Trump’s efforts at subverting the election. Read @tripgabriel on GOP: nytimes.com/2020/12/09/us/…
3. The Chinese government has aggressively used official Twitter accounts to spread propaganda & disinformation, including the accounts of diplomats & foreign missions. The messages are boosted by networks of human users & bots. Here's our story on that: nytimes.com/2020/06/08/tec…
4. The embassy has deleted the retweet of Trump from @ChineseEmbinUS. It retweeted Trump's attack on the election before 1 pm EST and deleted the retweet later this afternoon, after the post got attention. People have screencaps, including @tianyuf.
5. The Chinese Embassy posted this tweet at 11:20 pm EST, more than 10 hours after its account @ChineseEmbinUS retweeted the fake election fraud claim by @realDonaldTrump.
6. The Chinese embassy might have deleted the tweet after officials there or in Beijing realized retweeting Trump's election claims could complicate ties w/ the Biden administration. Here's our earlier story on how Trump has benefited China over 4 years: nytimes.com/2020/06/18/us/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: An official scientific report given to State Dept. says microwave “attack” likely led to severe injuries of US diplomats & spies in China, Cuba and other countries. Some say Russia is likely culprit — and ask why Trump hasn't acted. w/ @AnaSwanson. nytimes.com/2020/12/05/bus…
2. This is an important update to @nytimes investigation that noted the report's existence & demands by lawmakers that the State Dept. release it. The story also said CIA officers had reported illnesses on overseas trips — including @Mpolymer in Moscow: nytimes.com/2020/10/19/us/…
3. Important: The committee of 19 experts said the "most plausible mechanism" causing the injuries was "directed, pulsed radiofrequency energy" — not "continuous" energy. That implies it was deliberate and targeted. The experts fear this could occur again unless US takes steps.
Thread — On potential war crimes charges against US officials for supporting Saudi Arabia in the Yemen war: House lawmakers have released an important affidavit from Michael F. Miller, a career State Dept. official who helps oversee arms sales. Full doc: foreignaffairs.house.gov/_cache/files/d…
2. Miller confirms State Dept. lawyers issued a 2016 “formal foundational document" that remains “the most authoritative legal assessment on this matter.” We wrote about the key memo and the controversy in the Trump administration in this detailed story: nytimes.com/2020/09/14/us/…
3. Miller & colleagues involved in arms sales wanted updated legal guidance from the State Dept. given the ongoing civilian killings by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen. Legal risks to US officials were growing. But senior officials under @SecPompeo didn't update the guidance.
2. "Other presidents have embraced the perks of incumbency to their advantage. But no other modern president of either party has so brazenly directed government action toward his own benefit by so many agencies and departments." nytimes.com/2020/11/02/us/…
3. "And members of the president’s cabinet have fanned out across the country....In late September, Mr. Pompeo gave an official speech in — of all places — the Capitol building in Madison, Wis., a critical swing state that Mr. Trump narrowly won in 2016." nytimes.com/2020/11/02/us/…
NEW: US diplomats & spies say Trump administration has concealed info on mystery attacks abroad in which Russia is a suspect. We found new episodes w/ CIA officers in Moscow & elsewhere — similar to Cuba & China crises. w/ @AnaSwanson@julianbarnes. nytimes.com/2020/10/19/us/…
2. Our @nytimes investigation found the Trump administration took a softer approach on China. State Dept. didn't open an investigation there, as they had in Cuba. They downplayed the idea of attacks. They didn't give the same benefits to the US government employees who suffered.
3. US officials told us political aims in the White House played a big role in different approaches on the suspected attacks against Americans. Trump wanted to undo Obama’s opening w/ Cuba. But he wanted to strengthen ties w/ Putin and Xi, and he sought a trade deal w/ China.
In @nytimes story on indictment of Bannon: He was arrested in CT on yacht owned by Guo Wengui, Chinese tycoon in NYC said to have ties to China’s spy agency. Bannon took $1 million. Donald Trump Jr. endorsed the “fundraising.” Kobach was on its board. nytimes.com/2020/08/20/nyr…
2. Bannon’s friend Guo is not a Chinese “dissident,” as people claim. He has a complex history in elite power struggles. He fled China after officials arrested Ma Jian, a top officer in MSS, the spy agency. Sources in China say the two were close. More: nytimes.com/2018/12/27/wor…
3. Bannon has been on Guo’s payroll, in a big way. This story by @maggieNYT has info on a $1 million contract Bannon had with Guo and other payment details. @WSJ reported in July that the FBI is investigating Guo and looking into Bannon’s work with him. nytimes.com/2019/12/23/us/…
Pompeo just delivered a speech on China at the Nixon Library in which he said US relations w/ China should be based on “distrust and verify.” He didn’t call on Chinese citizens to rise up against the CCP or to change the direction of the party, though he praised dissidents.
2. Pompeo said Nixon "engaged Beijing with clear eyes.” But he also said, while at the Nixon Library & in the presence of Nixon’s family members, that “the kind of engagement we have been
pursuing has not brought the kind of change in China that President Nixon hoped to induce."
3. Pompeo said "the old paradigm of blind engagement with China has failed.” This is a straw man. If Nixon "engaged Beijing with clear eyes,” as Pompeo said, so did other US leaders. They gambled on various approaches. But they all knew the history of CCP rule — from Mao to Xi.