This video is of Elizabeth Warren before she became Senator when she wasn't afraid to call out Dem leaders for representing corporations not people.

How much of this story now applies to Warren herself? How many of today's "progressives" will do the same?
It's quite simple -- if you don't have the strength of will and organizing skills to proudly run as an independent, then how are you going to stand up to corporate pressures while in office?

Progressive activists need to be very careful who they are giving their time/money to.
It's no coincidence that the people afraid to declare independent opposition to the system get elected and then start voting for imperialism, massive war budgets, and more, despite all their progressive talk.

If you cave to "I have to run Democrat", what else do you cave to?
We've got to view independent organizing not just as an "option" or a "tool", but as an imperative -- a moral, ethical, strategic imperative *required* to defeat capitalism & the state, and therefore a test of character for potential candidates.
Don't get me wrong -- folks trapped in the Democratic Party are not necessarily "bad" people or trying to be misleading. Some are trying to do what they think is right.

The problem is what they think is right comes from a very shallow analysis of capitalism and power.
"Progressives" and leftists in general in the US often lack a comprehensive analysis and theory of capitalism, the state, and power in general. Therefore instead of forming a coherent roadmap toward change, it becomes sort of a jumble of knee-jerk reactions to capitalism.
Without a coherent analysis and praxis, it becomes very easily for capitalists and those with power to string along leftists with sticks and carrots. Push "compromise!" and get leftists to go along, when in reality it will never lead to the world leftists envision.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pittsburgh Green Left 🌻🥑

Pittsburgh Green Left 🌻🥑 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PghGreenLeft

11 Dec
A classic of Green Party history, the "Avocado Declaration" by Peter Camejo. Some describe themselves as "watermelons": "green on outside, red on inside", meant to evoke more of a Marxist attitude.

The Avocado Declaration states we're "green inside & out" marxists.org/archive/camejo…
The Avocado attitude comes from the idea that Green socialism is its own tendency, different from other forms of socialism. Particularly when you look at influences like Murray Bookchin's social ecology, it's easy to see a different praxis than that suggested by Marxist orgs.
Let's look at a few of the most standout parts of the Avocado Declaration and see how much applies to today still. (The original was written in early 2004).
Read 73 tweets
8 May
I accidentally found myself reading US Green Party history late last night and I didn't realize how deep the tension is between the more liberal Greens & socialist Greens going back to the founding of the party. No wonder some demonize Howie, it's a personal feud at this point.
Howie was basically the leader of the Left Green socialist faction in the party going back to the 1980s, arguing that Greens needed to be a working-class movement. While electoral politics is an element of that strategy, it shouldn't be the only or even major focus, he argued.
So when Howie says he's a party co-founder, he's not wrong. He founded the Left Green Network that was a precursor to a real national party, which became the Greens/Green Party USA, which was basically that leftist/socialist faction in the party.
Read 28 tweets
4 Aug 19
Entirely reasonable given its severity! Importantly, once you look at the causes and solutions to climate, you realize how intertwined everything is. We have to address capitalism, imperialism, racism, & build democracy to effectively deal with pollution & climate long-term.
Climate change isn't a "single issue", that's an establishment talking point. It is the UNIFYING issue, the end result of a combination of a host of other problems. We cannot significantly tackle climate without addressing root causes -- carbon emissions alone aren't enough!
Capitalism causes the climate crisis, because the endless drive for profit means an endless consumption of greater and greater amounts of resources. You cannot have forever growth. Period. Pretending that you can results in the pollution and problems we see today.
Read 50 tweets
28 Nov 18
The Socialist Party was winning elections in early 1900s and proved a strong opponent to the Dems & GOP, especially when combined with unions and strikes. I believe an independent party is needed yet again.
The Socialist Party was on track to become a major party in US politics until many anti-war socialist and union leaders were jailed during the World Wars (in particular, horrible laws like Sedition Act of 1918).
More or less, the final nail in the coffin was FDR's New Deal, which was largely based on demands from the Socialist Party platform. It was a compromise to "save capitalism", in FDR's words -- keep capitalism by creating a social safety net to reduce tensions.
Read 43 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!