#Soreloser wants to put human and technical intelligence sources and methods at risk by wantonly declassifying information. Let me translate that: people spying for us, and their families, could die, or be brutally treated and imprisoned. /1
And technical collection platforms could become deaf & blind against countermeasures, depriving the US of intelligence that protects Americans, and costing millions if not billions of taxpayer $$ in lost capabilities and r&d costs to recoup. /2
All because he’s a crybaby. /3
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@nick_shapiro nails it here re @MichaelJMorell as poss @CIA Director. He’s someone who understands and advocates for analytic standards & integrity, who understands how intel should inform policy & not be weaponized or politicized. /1
@MichaelJMorell understands the limits of covert action & influence capabilities, legitimate tools of statecraft in any President’s toolbox. Made an “honor the oath” a hallmark of his past tenure as deputy. /3
@MichaelJMorell will garner support from Senators on the right and left, but not the extremes—that’s what Americans should want in their @CIA Director. /4
Hi. Presidential head-of-state phone call guy here again. This is nuts. Let’s dissect. So, if he’s not involved, he’s not there to prep the President with expert advice from the interagency. /1
If he’s not there during the call, he can never be sure what was said, agreed to, or promised by either side, nor can he offer impromptu assistance when something unexpected comes up. /2
If he’s not there after the call, he cannot take any immediate direction from the President or participate in a call post mortem analysis. /3
When director of @CIA@GenMhayden hosted an intelligence director from a developing nation at Colonial Williamsburg. We gave the visitor a guided tour of the colonial capital of Virginia./1
As we toured the Virginia House of Burgesses, colonial seat of government, the guest asked us why the wall around it was so low. How did they protect the government from the people? /2
The tour guide explained that our government even at its earliest was a government of the people—the leadership didn’t need to fear the people. The visitor shook his head in amazement. /3
During my time at the White House Situation Room, it was normal practice for military officers to wear the more formal service uniforms when attending meetings there. They never would wear their less formal combat uniforms. /1
A search for images of Chm of the Joint Chiefs of Staff GEN Milley at the White House would suggest that this tradition continues today. /2
That makes it even more unusual, but more importantly INTENTIONAL, that GEN Milley wore his Army Combat Uniform to the White House today, as seen in pictures of him accompanying @realDonaldTrump on his St John's Church photo-op today. /3
A few comments: 1) very unusual for a DNI to declassify these names w/o an external request. Despite his being an original classification authority, this declassification doesn’t seem in furtherance of his mission. /1
2) What his action does, and this may be the intent, is discourage officials from making unmasking requests, thus limiting their full understanding of the intelligence they read and negatively impacting their policy judgments. /2
This is what happened in 2005/6 when the first unmasking controversy happened during @AmbJohnBolton’s confirmation as UN Ambassador. /3
So today we’ve learned it’s ok to conduct foreign policy while not in office, then to lie to the VP and others about that, setting yourself up for Russian blackmail. /1
We’ve learned that, despite a sworn oath to uphold the Constitution, its okay to lie to FBI agents conducting a counterintelligence investigation when questioned about that activity. /2
We’ve also learned that it’s ok to act on behalf of a foreign government without formal declaration while serving as national security advisor. /3