Mangy Jay Profile picture
12 Dec, 5 tweets, 1 min read
Our democracy is at a precipice. We would not have gotten to this point if our nation's history were not riddled w/ actions aimed at undermining citizenship, beginning w/ the right for white humans to own Black humans & extending to terrorism & apartheid upon slavery's abolition
In many ways, this current moment is both historic & horrific. But in other ways, it should be utterly predictable. How strong can a democracy actually be when its systems have systematically upheld unequal citizenship & when such inequality is treated as a reasonable position?
The history here is long & how it has culminated in this moment is multiply determined, but to give one specific example: how can we expect our democracy to not be hobbled when the right 2 vote for Black citizens is under constant attack & these attacks are treated as reasonable?
Again, there are many things that brought us to this moment, but I would ask for people to reflect on how the media has covered voter suppression. The evidence that laws are intended to undermine Black citizenship is robust. & yet we see these laws frequently presented as neutral
You cannot have a strong democracy in which the voices & choices of subsets of citizens are systematically oppressed. These are not circumstances in which democracy thrives, but rather the ingredients for an ever-growing streak of authoritarianism.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

13 Dec
I have many privileges due to how society values my identity. I am cis. I am white. I am straight. It has never cost me a single thing to listen to people who belong to groups over whom I have societal privilege. I don't get why this is so hard for some other people.
I can give an example. Once, on a blog, there was an article about racism & sexism directed towards a Black woman. White women were responding w/ an attempt at empathy, saying, "I experience sexism, so I cannot imagine what it's like to experience both sexism AND racism."
This was my natural reaction too. But then I saw that Black women were getting fed up w/ it. I asked why. One woman explained to me (bless her) that it felt like a decentering of the convo about the specific issues facing Black women & it was worse b/c it was happening en masse.
Read 6 tweets
12 Dec
I agree that what the GOP is doing right now is both horrific & historic. But we also need to be cognizant that they have made it their cause to undermine democracy for years. Previously, their efforts were directly targeted at Black people so white people didn't notice.
*How can they try to overthrow the results of an election?*

Shocking, I know. But also ask:

*How can they try to undermine citizenship & participation in democracy based on race?*

There's a pretty clear connection here.
How do you get to the point where democracy is so in peril? You never fully commit to democracy in the first place. You undermine the votes of given groups, demonize these same groups, put up every obstacle you can so they cannot vote, & then call their votes illegitimate.
Read 4 tweets
11 Dec
I feel like the Trump era has been so abusive and destructive that many of us are defaulting to kind of a "boys will be boys" mentality in response to an incumbent president attempting to use his power to literally overthrow our democracy.
I'm as prone to this as anyone else. I both entirely expected this kind of behavior & felt that it would never result in a successful coup. And I'm so fatigued by the years of scandal & horror that my reaction can kind of be a "shrug" followed by "makes sense."
But I shouldn't be that way, nor should anyone else. What's going on right now is an actual onslaught on the democratic process by the executive w/ support from allied members of Congress. The executive's supporters are also terrorizing state officials.
Read 4 tweets
11 Dec
An aspect of psychology that this site ramps up to 100 is the tendency to morph one's views to fit all of the views of the politicians one supports. This is generally bad for democracy, but it is specifically bad in the case of Tulsi Gabbard, given 90% of her views are terrible
This same phenomena has resulted in days of discourse on this site surrounding assertions such as,

"Maybe George Wallace did have a point"
&
"Can you really hold genocide denial against a person if he was only *25 years old* when he did it?"
What I agree w/ Tulsi on:

1. We should have universal healthcare with a big government role (we disagree on the specifics of the best path at this moment in time)

2.
Read 4 tweets
11 Dec
I actually do have more authority on stuttering than the majority of people, but that's neither here nor there. Just a basic knowledge of stuttering would lead people to the same conclusions about Biden's speech as I have come to. People who stutter on here can attest to that. Image
I think people think I talk about Biden's stutter just to defend him, & that's not the case. Biden will be fine. What bothers me more is that people who stutter are harmed by the discourse, I don't like disinfo, & conflating stuttering/dementia is harmful to ppl in both groups.
(Also screenshot is of a parody account--not the real @Wilson__Valdez )
Read 5 tweets
6 Dec
I just want to point out that the exit poll data we have on race X education pertains to white people only @nytimes nytimes.com/2020/12/05/us/…
Also, again, the exit polls on which this analysis is based are problematic. When you look at the data that we have in aggregate (exits + county results, etc), there is evidence of Dems losing ground w/ some subsets of Latino voters. This evidence is patchier for Black voters.
I have issues w/ extrapolating too much at this point in time from exits, but I will cite them here to demonstrate how spurious the claim about Black voters is. Using CNN (%Dem vs. %GOP):
2016: 89%-8%
2020: 87%-12%

These diff's are *unlikely* to be statistically significant.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!