in this case I assume the actual email is likely genuine. but it actually means nothing. People amend returns all the time. the premise of the story is that he found out he needed to amend a return and simply didn’t.
https://twitter.com/normornstein/status/1337880087430131714
2/ But there’s no reason to think this at all. It’s just a selectively leaked single email from someone the reporter knows is simply trying to damage Biden. If a piece of info speaks for itself or is clearly genuine it doesn’t really matter who the source is.
3/ But in this case neither is true. clearly Giuliani has all the emails. He says as much and can produce them at will. So a reporter is certainly going to say you need to show me all the adjacent emails so I know what it means.
4/ But Winters didn’t do that. he went with the implied meaning even though the source was clearly withholding other relevant info. That’s sloppy and not good journalism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
