I know I am both late to this and also this is a US thing, but the whole Dr Biden shouldn't be a Dr because.... some sort of false pretences is insane and really stinks as well.
I wryly note the pride that Surgeons have in the UK that they are *not* addressed as Drs but rather Mr (does the US have this as well) which is a real inside medicine moment.
Obviously Doctor (from the latin, to teach) has always been broader than medicine and indeed medical doctors I believe were a bit frowned on compared to the PhD/D. Phils
This historical perspective though is not confronting the main thing, which is, bizarrely, people feeling I guess threatened or concerned about women being... academic peers of men, with their own drives and delivery.
I'm ... married to a Dr in Education (the wonderful @barleybirney), have been taught and mentored by amazing women (notably Janet Thornton), I am the Deputy Director General to @embl's first female Director General, the accomplished Edith Heard.
I have peers, postdocs and students of all genders and want to have a lab and institute where the broadest possible mindsets feel comfortable and supported to ... get stuck into science.
It is just bizarre to think that someone's sex or gender (any configuration!) is somehow an important part of their ability to have insight, academic prowess or just delivery - from education, academia, business...
(final note; this endless needling in my view to create culture wars seems unhealthy to me. Why do it? Why stoke division? What world do these people want to live in?)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Deep breath, my views on the SARS CoV2 Mutation story in London/South East. It's a fast moving story (at least for phylogeography); I'm a one step-away from experts, aiming here to provide some light.
Some background - like all viruses SARS-CoV-2 encodes its information in a nucleic acid, in SARS's case, RNA. This is simply a very long polymer made from 4 chemical subunits; the "long form" of these chemicals are too tedious to write down, so we give the 4 letters - A,C, U* + G
(the * is because in RNA one of the bases is Uracil - U - whereas as in DNA it is Thymine - T - basically for these purposes it doesn't matter and because one often does read outs in DNA not RNA letters, one uses T not U. One of these little "this is how it works, its a detail")
Thoughts on COVID19 from a dark London sunday night; TL;DR - we should be hopeful, but we have to stay disciplined for a number months more.
Context: I am an expert in genetics + computational biology; I know experts in infectious epidemiology, clinical trials, immunology and viral genetics; I have COIs due to consulting to Oxford Nanopore that make a SARS-CoV-2 test + that I am trial participant on Oxford/AZ vaccine
A reminder. SARS-CoV-2 is an infectious human virus which causes a nasty disease in which a subset of people die, and another subset have a long term disease (LongCOVID) which looks like a viral trigger auto-immune disease.
I've recently navigated some COVID19 vaccine conversations with friends and friends of friends and wanted to give my take on why I - and you - should be confident to take them. Structured here as a Q&A:
(Context: I am a human genetics/computational biology expert; I know virus experts and clinical trials experts but I am not one myself; I am a trial participant on one COVID vaccine trial, the Oxford / AZ one).
Is the vaccine really safe? Surely if it has been done so quickly they've cut some corners?
Experienced software architect / standards expert? Want to make the world a better place by enabling responsible genomics and other health data sharing? This job, Chief Standards Officer of @GA4GH is for you: embl.de/jobs/searchjob…
(colleagues - please retweet or pop this tweet under the nose of people who you think might be interested)
@GA4GH is the global standards organisation to coordinate responsible data sharing between healthcare organisations through to research in genomics (DNA, RNA, Proteomics).
A view of COVID, heading into the Christmas period; ultimately a European, with strong focus on the UK view.
Context: I am an expert at (human/vertebrate) genetics and computational biology; I know experts in infectious disease testing and modelling, clinical trials, immunology. I have a COI in that I am long standing consultant to Oxford Nanopore, which makes a new COVID test.
A reminder: SARS-CoV-2 is coronavirus which jumped from another species late last year into humans; it is reasonably infectious in humans and causes a horrible disease in a subset of humans (older; male; obese) often leading to death.
My perspective on the COVID world, this cold November night in London
Context: I am an expert at genetics + computational biology. I know experts in viral testing, clinical trials, infectious epidemiology, immunology and cell biology of viruses. I have a COI in that I am a long established paid consultant to Oxford Nanopore which makes a COVID test
A reminder. SARS-CoV-2 is an infectious virus which causes a serious disease, COVID19, in a subset of people (more likely in people who are older, male, overweight) often leading to death. If we left the virus to move through the population many people would die quickly.