When will we learn if there are any faithless Electors? Recall that according to the 12th Amendment, the THREE candidates with the highest number of EVs are eligible to be considered for President if the election is thrown to the House of Representatives.
Did any Dems vote for Kamala Harris to preserve the ability to nominate her in case news comes out that knocks Biden out of consideration?
Did any Republicans vote for a poison pill candidate (e.g. Rand Paul) in the hopes that the poison pill candidate would garner more EVs than Harris for the #3 spot?
Could you imagine the situation where Congress faces the following choices:

1. Trump
2. Fatally flawed Biden (for example, ties bw Biden and CCP revealed)
3. Rand Paul
That was fast. No faithless electors.

In the even the election goes to the House, the only choices will be Trump and Biden.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ThunderStrzok (Real Thunder; not really Strzok)

ThunderStrzok (Real Thunder; not really Strzok) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThunderStrzok1

16 Oct
This is interesting.

On Saturday, July 27, 2019, Vadim Pozharskyi emailed Karen Tramontano worried that the July 25 Trump/Zelensky mentioned Burisma. Tramontano assured Pozharskyi that she and Sally Painter were on the case.
In fact, Tramontano said Painter would reach out to their "friend" and Tramontano had already contacted their "other friend".
The very next week, Ciaramella filed his whistleblower complaint.

thehill.com/policy/nationa…
Read 5 tweets
13 Oct
The FBI's corroboration of the dossier claims Carter Page worked "as Gazprom as a 'Corporate Broker'." Furthermore, the corroboration claims Page was instrumental in instituting an investor's day.

p10
scribd.com/document/47978…
This appears to come directly from the 3-17-2017 Carter Page 302 -- down to the awkward syntax. Notice that we appear to be receiving a bonus unredaction.
A few thoughts:

1. It's awfully odd that the FBI was busy corroborating the dossier in March 2017. The dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Page in October 2016. Why wasn't it corroborated then?

2. I don't like how this is constructed. Page never worked for Gazprom
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
Paul Sperry says that Brennan overruled including evidence that conflicted with the ICA's conclusion that Russia wanted Trump to win the 2016 election.

realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/…
Sperry says that CIA analysts Eric Ciaramella and Andrea Kendall-Taylor excluded evidence that Putin wanted Clinton to win.

Another name gets briefly mention -- Julia Gurganus, the boss of Kendall-Taylor. Sperry doesn't mention how Gurganus viewed the evidence. Image
On Dec 5, 2016, Gurganus told HPSCI the evidence wasn't conclusive regarding Russia's preference.

On Dec 6, 2016, Obama ordered the ICA.

Read 5 tweets
14 Jul
Just read the Geoffrey Berman transcript before the Judiciary Committee. Berman wasn't all that helpful to the House Dems. In fact, my biggest takeaway is that Berman's testimony inoculates his successor, Audrey Strauss, from any criticism from Democrats. judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
One of the first things Strauss did as Acting USA for SDNY was charge Ghislaine Maxwell. I don't know where that's going, but Democrats have really boxed themselves in a corner if they don't like what Strauss does.
With the help of Berman, Democrats have staked out the position that no one other than Strauss could be named Acting USA for SDNY.
Read 4 tweets
12 Jul
Serious question: Which Russian intelligence officer did Stone communicate with?

1. Henry Greenberg
2. Alexei Rasin
3. Guccifer 2.0

Any of those would be highly problematic for the RussiaGate narrative. So who was it?
After ruminating on this for a couple hours, I think I figured this mystery out.

Mueller is saying he investigated Stone due to his contacts with Russian intelligence. But Stone had no contacts with Russian intelligence. Somehow Mueller was deceived.
We all have a good idea on how Mueller was deceived about Stone's contacts with Russian intelligence. Some might even argue that Mueller was intentionally ignorant.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jul
1. I've argued that John Durham has been investigating SpyGate matters since July 2017 at the latest

I'm revising that. Durham has been on-board no later than June 11, 2017. Durham was working with Mueller the whole time, too @traceybeanz @15poundstogo

2. Check out this email to Michael Dreeben, one of Mueller’s team members at SCO. On June 11, 2017, Scott Schools wanted Dreeben to met John Durham. Schools thought it would be “helpful” if Dreeben and Durham talked.

p6 justice.gov/oip/foia-libra…
3. You know something else curious about this timeline? Two days earlier, June 9, 2017, it was reported that Dreeben would be working with Mueller’s team on “complex areas of criminal law, including what constitutes obstruction of justice”
law.com/nationallawjou…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!