My case is not "pushing back against transgender rights" it is case about belief discrimination.
It is about the right of people not to be discriminated against at work & by service providers for holding or not holding a belief about the nature of sex and gender identity.
Adding up some numbers in the public domain is not much of an investigation.
It is the work of a pocket calculator and 15 minutes.
The rest of the time was spent looking for the fabled shady right wing money... none was found
“Basically, money is being used to bully" says Clara Barker
Is Thompson Reuters saying that women like me, @BluskyeAllison@8RosarioSanchez are bullying the institutions that discriminated against us by having the temerity to raise money to hire lawyers ?
“It certainly feels like there (are) deeper pockets for those challenging our rights than those trying to protect our rights” says Clara .
The average donation to my crowd funder is £27
Clifford Chance is just one of the magic circle law firms with deep pockets that has signed up to give pro bono legal support to strategic litigation for trans rights cases - for example the 'X' passports case. cliffordchance.com/news/news/2019…
Another one, Dentons wrote a report advising campaigners on how they should be secretive in their lobbying to change the law so that children can change their legal sex without the involvement of medical professionals or parents rollonfriday.com/news-content/d…
How did Dentons and the transgender organisations get together... there was a matchmaker.
That would be.... Thompson Reuters Foundation
As @GlenTarman then head of the Trust Law, the pro bono law programme of the Thompson Reuters Foundation said "We hope this report will be a powerful tool for activists and NGOs working to advance the rights of trans
youth across Europe and beyond."
This takes a particular view of "rights of trans youth".
The judges in the case of Keira Bell v Tavistock were of course also considering rights of these children
The right not have experimental medical treatment w life long consequence at an age when they cannot weigh these
Trust law says that since they launched ten years ago they have generated the equivalent of $172 million in free legal assistance to NGOs and social enterprises "on the frontlines of social change"
I doubt any of that went to gender critical feminists.
So @TRFdotORG an organisation with the power to raise millions in donated legal time from the worlds biggest lawfirms is larping as @Reuters the trusted news agency to put the boot into a bunch of grassroots women raising funds by putting together their £20's on payday.
If there is no conflict of rights, then why is it that when we try to defend our rights to freedom of expression and against discrimination at work as women who believe that sex matters it is called being "anti trans rights"?
Good report from Fawcett on gender stereotypes and children
I wish they had been more courageous in looking at the disconnect between these recommendations and what schools are telling children about children being "trans"
They stick to the safe ground of saying children experiencing mental distress should get specialist support, but avoid saying anything anything about what schools do
Eg telling pupils that a boy experiencing mental distress relieved by wearing a dress & long hair "is a girl"
Challenging sex stereotypes in school is incompatible with promoting the idea of gender stereotypes.
I wish they had quoted @AbigailShrier instead of Stonewall.
In their data collection they dropped two tracking measures on how children feel about gender, because 1) they weren't robust tools 2) some kids found the ref to binary gender challenging and 3) some kids were distressed talking about it
This in the context where they are selling puberty blockers as a "pause button" and a chance to think.
They say the treatment enables a period of exploration of options, chosen by children able to consent, but also that talking about it is too distressing for these children. 🤔
The fact that some of the children are shying away from male and female binary further undermines the whole rationale.
Why does identifying as possibly "non-binary" justify extreme medical intervention?
Baroness Barker in the HoL on Keira Bell case "The legal team has brought several cases designed to oppose LGBT rights & restrict reproductive rights, actions consistent w orgs such as the Heritage Foundation & the Alliance Defending Freedom, extreme evangelical US orgs"
Legal team? Does she mean Jeremy Hyams QC and Alistair Henderson. No I think she is having a pop at Keira for using Paul Conrathe as solicitor.
So much guilt by vague association.
This brave young woman has suffered an unnecessary double mastectomy and hormone treatment that has altered her voice and may have damaged her fertility.
Baroness Barker has no compassion, erasing her agency and smearing her as a puppet of US religious right