Was GW Bush more fascist than Trump?
This good @michelleinbklyn column highlighted for me why I'm not the left.
Because not only do I disagree with those who say Bush was worse than Trump, I don't think "who was more fascist?" is a useful question.
1/x
nytimes.com/2020/12/14/opi…
Much of left discourse fixates on fascism. Some use "fascism" to mean any right-wing govt, anything bad about govt, or sometimes just "bad thing."
But even those who are more precise fixate on it, which leads them to search for parallels to historical cases and fascist theory
2/x
Instead of asking questions like "closer or farther from a free society?" or "how strong are these institutions?," the fixation on fascism leads to "how much does this resemble 1920s-30s Italy or Germany?" and "how close is this to that scholar's description of fascism?"
3/x
But fixating on the danger of a fascist takeover in America misses the more salient threat of democratic backsliding.
Simplifying a bit, fascism features strong institutions to impose its vision on society while democratic backsliding features weakening institutions.
4/x
So some lefties say Bush was worse than Trump because Bush created DHS after 9/11 while Trump tried to duck responsibility with COVID rather than use it to seize power like an American Reichstag fire.
But it was Trump's weakening of institutions that posed the big danger.
5/x
After four years of Trump, checks and balances were gone. Congressional oversight successfully defied. Senate advise and consent ignored. Impeachment a dead letter. DOJ and ODNI politicized. Inspectors general removed.
Trump and associates were effectively above the law.
6/x
The scariest part was Trump trying to corrupt the election.
An elected leader successfully manipulating an election to stay in power is when democratic backsliding gets really bad (eg 21st century Turkey). It shows the leader there's no checks left.
arcdigital.media/the-ultimate-c…
So Trump's COVID response wasn't fascist, in that he didn't use it as an excuse to seize power. But it was part of democratic backsliding, featuring corruption, attempts at patronage, weakening venerated institutions (eg CDC), and yet more assaults on objective truth.
8/x
Lefties who say Bush was more fascist than Trump work in a kind of symbiosis with anti-anti-Trumpers who say "see, told you Trump isn't fascist." By fixating on hypothetical fascism, both miss the more salient issue of democratic backsliding, for which Trump was much worse.
(END)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Grossman

Nicholas Grossman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NGrossman81

6 Dec
Republicans Meet the Modern GOP
A running thread of Republicans/conservatives expressing surprise & dismay that so many seem to actually believe election conspiracy theories as if distorting reality hasn't been central to the GOP for years.
If you spot good examples, let me know.
First, an incomplete list of false conspiracy theories pushed by prominent GOP officials and right-wing media figures in recent years
-Birtherism
-Pizzagate
-Colleges indoctrinate students into socialism
-Seth Rich
-QAnon
-Ukraine was really behind 2016 interference
-Hunter Biden
Ross Douthat, in a solid column exploring different types of paths to—and levels of—belief in conspiracy theories, showing he was at least somewhat in denial about the Trump-era GOP.
Yes, many average GOP voters really believe. They weren't just saying it.
nytimes.com/2020/12/05/opi… Image
Read 5 tweets
26 Nov
Many misunderstand the Flynn case because they don’t know the difference between counterintelligence and law enforcement.
Flynn was in big counterintel trouble, and got to plead guilty to a small criminal charge because he gave info to help FBI/Mueller counterintel investigation.
Michael Flynn’s defenders and apologists, from Glenn Greenwald to QAnon, elide the counterintelligence-law enforcement distinction, acting as if the only thing Flynn did wrong was lie to the FBI.
But the lying charge—which he pled guilty to multiple times—was the sweetheart deal.
To everyone asking if Flynn broke a deal by withdrawing his guilty plea and can now be charged for other things, I think that also confuses counterintel and law enforcement.
Info from Flynn is in the Mueller report. He gave something of value, so his CI deal is likely intact.
Read 9 tweets
24 Nov
Rubio spent four years excusing, defending, apologizing for, and protecting the biggest cause of America's global decline.
Relative decline for a unipolar power is inevitable. But it didn't have to be this fast, with US stupidly throwing away so much influence, from TPP to COVID.
Trump, Kushner, Pompeo, Esper, Barr, Mnuchin and other top admin officials went to Ivy League schools.
Clearly, where top officials went to school is not a good predictor of how they'll perform in office.
Rubio knows this. He just thinks faux populism will appeal to his audience.
US had TPP, the world's largest trading bloc, including a variety of Pacific Rim countries but excluding China. A great geopolitical move.
Trump bailed for no good reason, failed to get bilateral trade deals, and now there's a new world's largest trading bloc with China but no US
Read 7 tweets
11 Nov
Abrams acknowledged her loss, though maintained it was unfair, so she's already ahead of where GOP is now.
Her opponent was the official who oversees Georgia elections. He purged 340k voters from the rolls, many of them black. Abrams lost by <55k.
What's the equivalent in 2020?
After a successful lawsuit forced Georgia's now-governor Brian Kemp to release a list of purged voters, analysis revealed Kemp claimed thousands of voters he purged had moved out of the state, except they hadn't.
What's the equivalent evidence re: 2020?
rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
I know that "whatabout Stacey Abrams?" is a go-to move for people looking to excuse Trump's behavior, but we've never seen evidence-free claims of mass fraud and refusal to acknowledge results before.
The weakness of this whatabout highlights how abnormal that Trumpist claim is.
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov
Good time to reup my article about the big flaw in conspiracy theories: human beings mess up all the time.
But when you actually think through what it'd take for these plots to be true, hundreds even thousands of people must exhibit a superhuman competence
arcdigital.media/the-human-fall…
9/11 conspiracy theories require Twin Towers maintenance and security workers to have never noticed anything, or to all be in on it. The NYPD, FDNY, and various federal agents too. And all of them executed it perfectly, leaving no evidence, and all kept quiet for years.
Come on.
The alleged mass voter fraud conspiracies would need hundreds of thousands of fake ballots, which would take thousands of people to execute the scheme in various locations. Such a thing would leave tons of easily apparent evidence.
Remember, we're talking about human beings here.
Read 4 tweets
7 Nov
False. There's no standard by which Trump didn't "get us into any new wars" that doesn't also apply to Obama.
Both did drone strikes. Both added troops to some ongoing conflicts and withdrew some others. Both bombed regime targets in a new country but didn't invade (Libya, Syria)
Trump also generated greater confrontation with Iran by scrapping JCPOA without cause and bombed an Iran government target, Soleimani, the first military commander of a foreign state the US killed since WWII. In response, Iran bombed a US military target for the first time ever.
I've heard from various types of people that Trump is the first POTUS in a while not to start any new wars, or was more generally anti-war, and it's false. Some are lying, many are just misguided, but either way, it's wrong.
And yet, this inaccurate claim seems likely to persist.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!