Ok, a quick thread on why "calling out" racism doesn't work - when that's exactly what the far-right are looking for.
See these tweets by a prominent White Nationalist YouTuber for a start. They'll give you a clue.
Here we have a White Nationalist explicitly saying:
1) Their strategy is to hijack radio / TV shows and "use your anger to create publicity".
This is literally their aim. We played straight into them
2) Amazed that the Left has fallen into the trap of seeing Nazis everywhere.
This was also always the strategy of people like Katie Ho**ins, Lau***ce Fox, David Van** and a whole range of other grifters:
- to provoke and anger people on social media
- get attention
- be seen as the culture-warrior taking on the left
- make money.
This is an *explicit strategy* called "triggering the libs" - as a way to get attention and make money.
What frustrates me is that after years of seeing grifters make money like this - people still don't get it. They're not losing, they're making $$$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owning_th…
"Calling out" only properly works when people change their minds or accept they were wrong.
That matters a lot on:
- who is saying it (Jeremy Clarkson admitting climate change is real)
- what language they use.
Doesn't work if you're preaching to people who hate you.
The best ways to deal with Nazis:
- make them an object of ridicule (Stewart Lee)
- ignore, block and move on.
Amplifying them or turning them into the story gives them far MORE prominence - exactly what they're looking for.
A simple "calling out" of racism makes *us* feel better, and that may partly be the aim, but it doesn't actually lead to better outcomes.
I want better outcomes. We can be smarter than this instead of falling for the traps that neo-Nazis lay for us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I first wrote about CSE around... 2004 (wow, 16 years now)... and how we need a full investigation into this topic instead of brushing it under the carpet, after a C4 doc on the topic got shelved.
I've always believed we need a proper investigation regardless of sensitivities.
Here is the key paragraphs, from a report with a foreword by PRITI PATEL (so don't say its trying to be politically correct!)
One of my friends (an Asian woman) on Facebook has gone full Q-Anon. It was jarring to see at first.
Didn't think people like her would be the target audience, TBH.
Some observations:
1) Q-A people spend a lot of time boosting and praising each other on each other's FB pages. Drives up engagement, visibility and makes them look much bigger.
Every post of her has lots of comments and shares. The comments are.... mad. But they work in boosting engagement.
2) Most of the messages are either #SaveourChildren#GoodoverEvil or pro-Trump. They genuinely believe they are trying to do good in the world and save others.
Lots of messages ape language of empowerment and motivation. 'do good in the world' etc etc.
I love this country and I'm not afraid to say it. I really, genuinely do.
The Labour Party too mustn't be afraid of saying, especially its leaders.
One key reason I think Corbyn lost is Brits largely didn't largely believe he loved it too.
The gripe is this: some on the modern (Twitter) left believe declaring pride / love of your country, call it patriotism, is 'shameless pandering'.
That's the problem. They cannot conceive that anyone on the left could believe such a thing.
And so we end up with really silly debates about whether Lisa Nandy sounded like she was echoing Britain First.
They folks don't even see the language of patriotism unless it's by the (English) far-right. So of course their view of this whole debate is distorted.