Being reckless with the lives of others isn’t really in the spirit of Christmas, is it?
Let me break this down for anyone who feels like they are going mad-as someone who does political analysis for a living but who is also, crucially, one of the sappiest soppiest Carol-hollering fairy-light-festooning Christmas Spirit elves you will ever meet:
Really, stay at home.
For ages, cultural conservatives have laid claim to Christmas as if they own it- which is odd, because it’s a celebration that’s meant to be all about tolerance and nobody left out in the cold and open hearts and all that stuff. (With optional Jesus).
This poses a problem.
No politician- especially no conservative politician- wants the optics of being the one to actually literally cancel Christmas. They can starve single parents and leave refugees to drown, but cancelling Christmas is apparently a bridge too far.
This is because optics are all the political right, at least the section of it in power, actually knows how to do. They are hollow men with no vision or purpose, terrified of their own mediocrity and achingly aware of their own incompetence in the face of actual crisis.
These are, in short, people who could not actually host a Christmas dinner if their joyless, inept little lives depended on it. They have no concept of what it means to actually devote your time and energy to making other people’s lives a little bit better.
The people making a song and dance about not cancelling Christmas for COVID are the exact people who you always dread coming round for Christmas. They don’t help clear up, they hog the remote, they pick fights, the whole holiday is spent managing their fragile egos.
The British government is prepared to tolerate thousands of extra deaths from COVID-19- gruelling, painful, pointless, avoidable deaths- just so they don’t have to be the ones responsible for ‘cancelling Christmas’.
That strikes me as somewhat counter to the Christmas spirit.
I’m a goofball who loves Christmas. Every year at exactly 3pm on Christmas Eve I still insist on opening the windows to ‘let the spirit of Christmas in’ (I am 34 years old).
This year I’m spending it away from home, for the first time. I SO wish it weren’t the right thing to do.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[thread] We’ve heard a lot about the downsides of so much of our professional lives moving to video platforms. But I think that for some people there have also been real advantages.
EG: I’m physically small. I am not used to taking up the same space as everyone else. It’s great!
Women and other AFAB people are used to monitoring our physical presence. If you’re petite like me, you get spoken over/patronised/dismissed. But if you’re taller/ heavier, you get to worry about being ‘intimidating’ or taking up more space than women are allowed to occupy.
I’m also neuroatypical and sometimes have a problem working out whose face I should be looking at/managing eye contact. On zoom? That’s not a problem. You can just look at the screen- and you can see everyone at once! >
Spent today reading ‘Hood Feminism’ by @Karnythia - excellent, and required reading for all white people in the feminist movement. Found myself called out in the last chapter. Which I appreciated, though it was painful to read, as it made the hit home.
It got me thinking >
Over the years, I’ve watched so many white, cis and/or otherwise privileged progressives behave like wankers when they’re called out. I’ve seen people use the fact of angry criticism to play the victim and double down on their own wankery. It’s boring, predictable, and so toxic.
I include myself in that- I haven’t always done well when called out, although better than some, mainly because I have a reputation for well-reasoned apologies (‘performative apology’ is actually what MK calls me out for in her book).
I am, in fact, pretty good at saying sorry. >
Since we’re all talking about the ‘Blitz Spirit’, and how we should act like Londoners in WW2, here’s something that never makes it into the official story.
Remember those iconic photos of working-class Londoners sheltering in tube stations? Well, that wasn’t meant to happen >
The government did not build the recommended municipal shelters, preferring to leave that to private companies + individuals. When the bombs first fell, the underground was barricaded. The fear was that once the working class went underground, they would never come up again >
The hardest hit areas were poor, immigrant and and working-class communities in the East End, who had nowhere to go. Meanwhile, large clubs and hotels were digging out private shelters.
In 1940, activists led the people of Stepney to storm the Savoy shelter during an air raid.
I went to a private school. I am keenly aware of how privileged I am to have done so. They are absolutely, categorically, engines of inequality, and I don’t know how anyone of conscience can argue otherwise.
> It wasn’t just the actual education I received at that school that made a difference. It was the support of teachers who had time to engage with a needy, intelligent child like me, within a structure that encouraged the highest expectations. >
> the most important lessons I learned at private school included that sense of entitlement, that base assumption of ‘why not me?’. I was on a large scholarship, and I was expected to repay that charity by achieving the highest grades and getting into Oxbridge.
Right. It’s Friday night. The rainforest is burning and fascists are wrecking what’s left of democracy.
Let’s talk about depression.
[content warning: mental health chat!]
Firstly: seriously, how is everyone doing?
Almost everyone I know and love is having a hard time right now. Almost everyone I know comes home from a hard day being ground on the wheel of late stage disaster capitalism and tries to wrap their shattered brain around the very real prospect of species collapse. It’s a lot.
If the state of the world is contributing to your anxiety, your depression or your ill health, it’s not your fault. It’s not ‘all in your head.’
Depression is, in part, a physiological reaction to overwhelming circumstances.
Actually, since people are once again trashing me for things I didn’t say and positions I didn’t take two years ago, I’ve a thing or two to say about being ‘cancelled’. Listen up, this isn’t going where you might think it’s going.
When I wrote what I still believe we’re good pieces about Milo and his followers, a lot of people came down hard calling me a fascist myself because I was apparently ‘friends with a fascist’ and painting members of the alt-right as merely ‘misunderstood’ and not dangerous. >
>neither of these things were true. I also took care not to repeat any of Milo’s messaging. But I was unable to control the story that they were, that I was the worst person ever and basically promoting white supremacy. A lot of friends turned on me >