27 Senators sign a bipartisan letter supporting inclusion of the recently-announced surprise billing agreement in the year-end spending legislation: cassidy.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Unfortunately, the AMA is opposing the bipartisan surprise billing legislation.
Interestingly, they previously seemed to support the Neal/Brady bill (left), and the new bill is identical other than a couple concessions to provider lobbying.
searchlf.ama-assn.org/letter/documen…
Interestingly, they previously seemed to support the Neal/Brady bill (left), and the new bill is identical other than a couple concessions to provider lobbying.
searchlf.ama-assn.org/letter/documen…
The way this is written, you’d think AMA and other provider groups weren’t the ones pushing arbitration (and the administrative headache that goes along with it) this whole time.
Although AMA makes a valid point on the provider directory provision.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
