Share this page!

Jonathan Turley Profile picture
Twitter logo
16 Dec, 4 tweets, 1 min read
Aa previously noted, the Congressional Medal of Honor recognizes brave corporals, not corporeal bravery. Just in case there is a need for the distinction, consider Corporal Mitchell Red Cloud Jr. jonathanturley.org/2020/12/16/for…
...Even as hyperbole, Woodhouse’s statement shows the level of spin required to dismiss this story, which is being buried by most of the media. Notably, Swalwell was particularly adamant to in calling for the investigation of an alleged Russian asset meeting with Don Trump Jr..
... Swalwell was also one of those calling for more investigations into an accused Russian asset seducing a NRA official. Indeed, at the time, Brad Woodhouse was not handing out CMHs but charges for a FEC investigation.
I am sure that Woodhouse did not mean to insult CMH winners and this is a comment that he would now take back.  We have all had such moments.The more important aspect is how Democrats (and the media) are dismissing the story despite the coverage of previous and analogous scandals

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jonathan Turley

Jonathan Turley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonathanTurley

Jonathan Turley Profile picture
16 Dec
Sen. Johnson and Sen. Peters just went into a full contact exchange in the hearing on alleged voting fraud. Johnson accused Peters for falsely accusing him of spreading Russian disinformation that is now being investigation by the Justice Department.
...The fact is that the hearing has been very interesting to hear a full discussion of these allegations from both sides, including excellent contributions from Krebs to rebut the Dominion allegations. The Wisconsin counsel also offered some interesting points on rule changes.
...Krebs just suggested that his staff was asked take down or change his office's public statements on conspiracy theories and disinformation. He said that he was never directly to do so, but suggested that pressure may have been put on his staff.
Read 5 tweets
Jonathan Turley Profile picture
13 Dec
CNN's Jake Tapper just interviewed Stacey Abrams about her views on how Republicans are trying to bar voters and violate election laws. Despite Abrams expressing pride in her past work, Tapper never asked Abrams about investigations into her group for voter fraud or violations.
...Tapper quoted Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger but omitted his repeated accusations against her group, New Georgia Project. Those allegations are unproven but they should not be unreported or unaddressed as Abrams discusses voting integrity.wsj.com/articles/georg…
...A friend pointed out that Abrams is no longer part of the group. However, I still believe (particularly when discussing Raffensperger's comments) Abrams should have been asked about countervailing claims made against the group and her association with it...
Read 4 tweets
Jonathan Turley Profile picture
12 Dec
Giuliani just said "we are going to take the advice of the Supreme Court" and bring the cases in the individual cases. He actually looks good after his bout with Covit-19. Not sure about the condition of the challenges however.
...Giuliani says that they still have time to bring such challenges despite the voting on Monday. The only way that the campaign would have time is with a "Death Star" strategy. jonathanturley.org/2020/11/23/the…
Giuliani says that there is no way that the justices read their papers. That is obviously untrue. Many of us said that the Texas lawsuit was highly unlikely to satisfy standing as a threshold matter. The filing was carrying more baggage than Amtrak.
Read 4 tweets
Jonathan Turley Profile picture
8 Dec
It only took a presidential pardon but Judge Sullivan has finally dismissed the Flynn case. in.reuters.com/article/usa-tr… However, he decided to effectively and gratuitously declare Flynn guilty in a roughly 40 page opinion ...

jonathanturley.org/2020/11/25/the…
The court's opinion seemed intent on clearing its own reputation by trashing what reputation remains for Michael Flynn. Such a decision would ordinarily outrage civil libertarians but principles of judicial restraint seem suspended when dealing with anyone associated with Trump.
...When prosecutors drop charges, most judges are careful not to offer their own views on the guilt or innocence of an individual. After all a defendant has no appeal or recourse from such an declaration from the bench...
Read 4 tweets
Jonathan Turley Profile picture
3 Dec
The Trump team started out in the Nevada hearing today with a loss. The court barred a witness declaration as submitted too late under the discovery order. It is now proceeding with the evidence submitted before the Nov. 25th deadline.
Jesse Binnall is arguing for the Trump campaign. The threshold issue is the burden of proof. The state is pushing for the higher "clear and convincing" standard as opposed to the standard civil "preponderance of the evidence."
What is fascinating is that this very basic question is not answered in the statute or case law in Nevada. Kevin Hamilton representing the Democrats is arguing for the higher standard in the hearing. I am rather surprised by the lack of controlling authority on this key standard
Read 13 tweets
Jonathan Turley Profile picture
30 Nov
NY Solicitor General Underwood is struggling in oral argument in the census case after conceding that there would be no problem with government submitting two sets of figures "in separate envelopes." Some justices are slamming what they view as a "meaningless" distinction.
...Justice Sotomayor came to the rescue by saying that the Court could decide whether the Secretary should be barred from submitting "illegal information" to the President, including figures excluding "illegal aliens."
The justices are discussing a possible off-ramp based on the view that this is premature since no action has occurred. This raises a serious standing issue. It is ironic that the liberal justices voted that the New York challenge over Cuomo's pandemic order was premature.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @JonathanTurley has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @JonathanTurley!

Read all threads by @JonathanTurley