Pieter Borger Profile picture
Dec 17, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Snopes' "fact checkers" are wrong about mRNA vaccins:

snopes.com/fact-check/mrn…

Snopes, who claims to do fact checking, writes:

"No, mRNA COVID vaccines do not alter your DNA".

Snopes did not even begin to check the science facts.
The science facts are that RNA vaccins can potentially change your DNA. To understand how, we have to go a bit into genomics. Our genome contains about 50-60 thousand genes (~20 thousand protein-coding genes, the rest RNA genes). Together they make up about 25% of the genome.
In addition to that, our genome contains about 50% socalled transposable and transposed elements (TEs), including ERVs and LINEs. The latter function, among other things, as (epi)genetic switches to control when genetic programs are switched on and off.
Interestingly, ERVs and LINEs both posses genes for the enzymes "reverse transcriptase (RT)" and "integrase" (INT). The RT enzyme converts RNA into cDNA, whereas the INT enzyme can put cDNA back into the genome. They prefer doing this with viral-like RNA molecules.
Further, RNA vaccins use viruses as their genetic backbones. RNA vaccins contain viral RNAs. With thousands of copies of RT and INT genes in our genomes there is ample opportunity to put any viral RNA back into our DNA. So, RNA vaccins are potentially "genotoxic".
"Genotoxic" means that the "RNA-->cDNA-->genome integration" mechanism can lead to disturbed genetic control. In the long run, that may lead to genetic abberations and disease. It should be noted that RNA vaccins were not tested to exclude above described genotoxicy.
Taken together, SNOPES IS WRONG. It has not even been tested!

And I, a genome researcher, am not going to take a shot (or two) of the novel RNA Vaccins.

Isn't it tale telling that "Swissmedic" the drugs approval organ in Switzerland did not approve these vaccins?
Self-amplifying RNA vaccins may further increase the odds of DNA integration, because it is chemically stabilized and highly expressed in the cells.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pieter Borger

Pieter Borger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BorgerPieter

Mar 11
No, my dear modern apes (which you are not), the difference between man and chimp really is 15-17 % on genetic level. It was described in the first chimp-man comparison in Nature 2005, but as genuine pseudoscience not reported.
Always check the methods...
2,4/2.8 x 100% = 15%.
Image
The huge difference of 15% was confirmed by Tomkins and independently by Kronenberg et al in 2018 as reported in Science (below). So, Tomkins and I, we are right.

science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
I discussed the 15% difference on several platforms and found it always denied by darwinians. I reported it in my 2009 book Darwin Revisited. In this book I falsify and refute all Darwinian hypotheses and introduce a novel theory of organic change.
amazon.de/Darwin-Revisit…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 10
Beste mensen, er wordt op Twitter weer heftig gediscussieerd over HCQ. Mensen die HCQ in diskrediet willen brengen, kunnen dat met science. Mensen die HCQ in krediet willen brengen kunnen dat ook.

Mijn stelling "Science is dead" is weer verder onderbouwd.
Image
Image
Niet te vergeten deze gefraudeerde paper waar het allemaal mee begon om HCQ in een kwaad daglicht te stellen (van een mij welbekende prof uit Zurich, die er overigens nog steeds gewoon werkt - frauderen mag blijkbaar op de academia):

thelancet.com/journals/lance…
En dan deze meta-analyse in NAture (), die door niemand word gelezen die hem aanprijst. De methode is dubieus, want selectief. Tevens zwaar gesponserd door pharmaffia en dus ongeloofwaardig (sponsors staan altijd helemaal aan het eind): nature.com/articles/s4146…


Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 30, 2023
Het veel gehoorde „immune escape„ betekent verder niks dan „vaccin werkt niet“.

Laat u niks wijsmaken. Corona vaccins hebben nooit gewerkt. Niet tegen SARS-CoV-1, niet tegen MERS, niet tegen verkoudheid HCov.
Natuurlijk bestaat er ook immune escape, maar niet door één mutatie in het Spike proteïne.

Waarom niet?

Omdat het Spike in stukjes wordt geknipt alvorens het aan het immuunsysteem wordt aangeboden. Één mutaties maakt dan niet uit.
Iedereen met een beetje verstand van immunologie weet dit. Waarom virologen u dit niet kunnen vertellen is mij een groot raadsel. Het is eerstejaars immunologie.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3075589/
Read 5 tweets
Jun 23, 2023
The Corman-Koopmans-Drosten PCR-Test paper, published in @Eurosurveillanc we showed in 2020 to be inadequate to function as a reliable diagnostic for SARS2, and which we advised to be retracted...is now indexed at @retractionwatch!

@MarionKoopmans @c_drosten @rivm
The problems with this test, which caused a PCR-demic, are manyfold as mentioned in the retraction-watch data base.

What is going on, @MarionKoopmans, @c_drosten?

I think, many people would like to know.

retractionwatch.com/2020/12/07/pub…
PCR demics are know to science, as it happened before.

The cause is: blind faith in bad science (which is common nowadays due to lack of real knowledge).

nytimes.com/2007/01/22/hea…
Read 5 tweets
Jun 21, 2023
“A child is not a Christian child, not a Muslim child, nor an atheistic child, but a child of Christian parents or a child of Muslim parents or of atheistic parents."

(Free after Richard Dawkins, in The God Delusion).

It is all a brainwash.

Think free & you´ll find God.
A good way to find God is science. Or to quote Heisenberg:

“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.”
Read 4 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
Please, read and spread this paper.

Abstract:

1/n "Decades of sophisticated and detailed legislation created to safeguard Humanity from exposure to Genetically Modified Organisms, was ignored or legislated away in an instant when SARS-CoV-2 arrived."

researchgate.net/publication/36… Image
2/n "This was done with intention, and not for the good of Humanity. The LNP-modRNA ‘vaccines’ always fulfilled the legal definitions for being categorised as Genetically Modified Organisms. Pfizer, Moderna, and regulators all knew this."
3/n "The claims by Pfizer and Moderna repeated by regulators and complicit politicians that modRNAs do not enter the cell nucleus, and reverse transcribe into the Human Genome, were lies, made knowingly."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(