Russian teams and athletes cleared to participate will only be able to as neutrals, while flag, anthem and other insignia will also be barred
Ban covers Vladimir Putin, too. According to the CAS ruling, the Russian president and other senior Russian government officials will be barred from the Olympics and other top sports events for two years.
The ban stands unless the prime minister/president of the host country invites
Feel the hand of the IOC in the initial ban on officials from the Russian Olympic Committee being lifted by CAS. Under WADA's original punishment they were also to be barred from events for the duration of the punishment.
Shame the CAS panel didn't explain why it watered down several aspects of the original penalty. Here are some examples: 1. Before athletes had to prove they were not linked to the doping program. Now WADA has to link them to it. Much harder to prove beyond doubt.
2. Ban on officials from the Russian Olympic Committee has been lifted.
3. The word "Russia" can be used on uniforms provided they also contain language referring to the participant as a "neutral". That was not the case before.
4. The ban on politicians from president down now contains proviso that they can attend should they be invited by a head of state. Can't imagine the Japanese PM saying no to Putin.
US antidoping agency head Travis Tygart not holding back from criticising a CAS decision he believes is “devastating” and one that “put politics over principle”.
The CAS verdict does raise questions about the CAS process and how the panellists arrive at their conclusions, and what justifications there are for watering down the various aspects of the punishment. But given there's such little transparency with CAS we will never know.
Initial reaction from Russia suggests, they’re not too unhappy with what went down at CAS. Ice hockey federation playing up the parts that were watered down by the 3 CAS arbitrators
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lille in a mess, but Gerard Lopez, the man who created the crisis, probably made a few bucks along the way by building a model that worked for him but not the club. 💰
Lille aren’t struggling financially because of a structural issue in French football. They are struggling because the owner found a way to profit from player trading while keeping debt loaded onto the team. The profit on players didn’t go to pay down debt. Where did it go?
Really, a lot of this is due to a local of regulatory oversight of football club operations. Many clubs seem now seem to be little more than commodity trading operations.
Another round of anti corruption raids on Benfica and president Luis Felipe Vieira once again allegedly a direct focus of police investigation. Despite numerous allegations against him he was recently reflected president by the club’s members. tvi24.iol.pt/amp/geral/30-1…
Not a headline any football club needs.
Benfica confirms the raid in a statement, but did not interestingly use the statement to deny the allegations of “sporting fraud”, which include claims a bunch of smaller league rivals were paid off.
Interesting that details of some sponsorship deals (Etisalat) are redacted, others (Etihad) are not. Also says Etihad paid City 221m GPB for 3 seasons through 2016. Per season that's more than Chevy's deal for Man Utd (but City's includes stadium, campus, etc)
As per the CAS rules, both sides picked a panelist each to sit on three-member group that would decide on City's appeal. City also recommended the chairman, a Portuguese jurist, which UEFA agreed with. City secured its appeal by majority verdict, so 2-1
Amanda Staveley's business partner in PCP, Craig Eadie, being cross examined by Barclays lawyer today. He's having a tough time. Calls into question what exactly PCP is. Hard to think of it as anything more than a broker/middleman at this point.
What's happening in the High Court calls into question claims about Staveley and her company that are routinely made and regularly appear in articles like this: thetimes.co.uk/article/amanda…
Among the interesting aspects from the court hearing have been details of the fight from PCP to get paid anything at all from Abu Dhabi following the deal. Initial amount offered was 5m GBP, eventually an agreement struck at 30m GBP. Reminder Staveley/PCP suing for 1.5bn GBP