1/8 🔴UNUSUAL abt f/raising ..Staple St rec'd the money QUICKLY probably a 'one-and-done' deal.. means a SINGLE strategic client may have taken up entire fund. 🔴UBS Secs 3 of its Bd mbrs are Chinese Nationals. DEC 5, flwg our report the names are REMOVED threadreaderapp.com/thread/1339559…
Opinion: President Trump Should Immediately Impound Dominion Machines.
The forensic report concluded that Dominion s/ware was “intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
2/5 Even more shocking (if that’s possible) is a YT vid of a GA election official showing how Dominion’s so-called “adjudication” function works. Whoever dreamed of such a thing—“adjudicating” ballots? The idea is this: If a paper ballot is ambiguous—say a voter voted for both
3/x Trump and Biden (an “over-vote”) or the circles are filled out incompletely—the s/ware assigns the ambiguous ballot to “adjudication” so that, in theory, an election official can examine the paper ballot and “adjudicate” it, ie decide who the voter intended to vote for and
2/3 .@indacopa
EPSTEIN ISLAND and why SCOTUS will not overturn the election. He swims with them, legislates for them and rules in their favor. He is a never-Trumper.
Globalists have no place on the bench period.
3/3
This John Roberts is one and the same. Did someone say BLACKMAIL?
🔴This could be a good time to talk to Ghislaine Maxwell who wants to be released with a bond for Christmas.
1/8 Who owns Dominion? D fund raising🔴Speculations are a Chinese investor could be an indirect investor in the coy. Several UNUSUAL features of the f/raising ...Staple St rec'd the money QUICKLY despite the slowed f/raising environment. The pace & the structure...The firm did a
2/8 'one-and-done' deal. That means a SINGLE strategic client may have taken up the entire fund... ANOTHER unusual feature: UBS Secs, 3 of its Bd members appear to be Chinese Nationals.🔴WE REPORTED DEC 5, flwg our report the names are REMOVED. Raising q's abt WHY UBS NY did not
3/8 respond to our request for comment. It's unusual to name Chinese citizens on the board of a NY subsidiary and this raises the q of whether these Chinese people on the board HAD TO APPROVE a transaction that could o/wise not be approved w/out their presence. This is a fair q