Thread by @EOwhit

These are the two tweets we are comparing. As of now his newest for the first snip, today (both of em) at 22:13. Next we will do his second (that early morning one aside) tweet of the day, which is at 09:55am. Subtracted is such is the snip.

Alright so a few things I'll highlight. The link is an email the contains the phrase "chatter" this should be relevant in a moment. The next one would be plus 12 so 1230 is next.

1230, more sense in a moment, why 3099 is highlighted, plus those 113's, "Plausable deniablitiy" as well. We had 4am on our last drop 4am, a=1 m=13 is a difference of 12. So 4/12 or 1/3. Hence 131. We have four repeats here as well. Odds? I dunno.
Remove the 131, leaving 3099

3099 has; 'many'(4chars) our tweet has "shots"(5chars) (4)(5). Now look at this. previous drop, "plausable deniablility"? We're a little over 1800 drops away. 1Year 9Months? 1+9=10
"SHOTS"=81 add them up by there numerical equivialant.
'MANY'= 53,
81-53= 28, 2+8=10

Further more that time at the top is 1910[55]secs. Subtracted by our morning tweet(09:55) is 555 minutes. Remember we started using different time variation. As cool as it is, it was still a straight face value drop. 'll continue with those as we have two more. 738 is inbound!

Alright, 738 has another key word I mentions earlier, "chatter" this one is close to 900 drops away. So at the very least we have two keywords tied together despite the dissemnation variation. We have a 313 for a similarity as well.

I was going to imlore as to seconds, I din't find an obvious tie, so might want to go check 4428.
21/19, 5:5 (1025)
Any errors, I apologize, let me know via tweet/dm or both.
@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll. (again)