“For all the euphoria that rightly greeted Chinese President Xi Jinping’s announcement in September of a peak in carbon emissions by 2030 and a decline to net zero by 2060, the promise of that declaration is at risk,” ⁦@davidfickling⁩ writes (1/x). bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
“To see why, consider Xi’s follow-up speech to the international Climate Ambition Summit on Dec. 12. While reiterating his earlier promises, it fell short on the most important point: How much China is prepared to spend decarbonizing its power system.”
“The installed capacity of solar and wind power will rise to at least 1,200 gigawatts by 2030, he said, compared to 440GW at present. That represents pedestrian growth of around 76GW a year, roughly in line with installations during 2018.”
“The 2018 number was, to be sure, a record at the time, and China is by far the biggest developer of renewable power anywhere. Still, the planned pace is well below expectations of around 115GW a year from China’s solar and wind industry bodies...”
“...not to mention levels as high as 160GW that some analysts have expected to see in the 14th Five-Year Plan released next March.”
“If China hits its economic targets, that slow pace of deployment all but guarantees that emissions from fossil power plants will continue to grow.”
“There’s no need for such timidity. Nearly all new wind and solar projects in China already provide cheaper power than new coal generation, and about half would be cheaper than keeping existing coal and gas plants running.”
“Even if China ends up exceeding the 1,200GW number, by lowballing his renewables ambitions Xi is sending a message that the country is ready to take a fiscal and productivity hit — as well as harming the health of its citizens, and the planet’s climate...”
“...if it helps prop up smokestack industries that would be threatened by a faster move toward zero.”
“Beijing’s view of decarbonization looks like St. Augustine’s view of chastity: It wants to be pure, just not yet. The trouble is, if it doesn't move fast, it may be too late — both for China and the planet.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Wallace-Wells

David Wallace-Wells Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dwallacewells

7 Dec
The most promising of the vaccines was fully designed before the first confirmed American case and was manufactured for testing before the first American death. How much faster could we have moved to deliver it? How many lives might've been saved? (1/x) nymag.com/intelligencer/…
"To start, this is—as the country and the world are rightly celebrating—the fastest timeline of development in the history of vaccines. It also means that for the entire span of the pandemic, which has killed more than 250,000 Americans, we had the tools we needed to prevent it."
"That a vaccine was available for the entire brutal duration may be, to future generations trying to draw lessons from our death and suffering, the most tragic, and ironic, feature of this plague."
Read 27 tweets
5 Dec
"The virus could mutate at any time. We don’t know how long it’s going to take this virus to escape immunity. But we do know that we have effectively created one vaccine — all of these vaccines are identical." (1/x) nymag.com/intelligencer/…
"We are putting so much ecological pressure on this one virus with these vaccines. And all it takes is one virus out of the quadrillions of viruses that are being produced across the globe right now in people’s bodies..."
"All it takes is for one of those viruses to say, you know what? I want to figure out how to evade this person’s immune response. It’s astounding to me that this isn’t, like, considered a crisis."
Read 5 tweets
29 Nov
“If one is to believe recent IPCC reports, then gone are the days when the world could resolve the
climate crisis merely by reducing emissions.” @wim_carton is exceptionally incisive about the hype of negative emissions. (1/x, with thanks to @Peters_Glen) researchgate.net/publication/34…
“Avoiding global warming in excess of 2°C/1.5°C now also
involves a rather more interventionist enterprise: to remove vast amounts of carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere, amounts that only increase the longer emissions refuse to fall.”
“The basic problem with
this idea is that the technologies supposed to deliver these ‘negative emissions’ currently do not exist
at any meaningful scale.”
Read 18 tweets
12 Sep
"What can be done?" The California fires are now almost twice as destructive as those of 2018, which set records. The fire season is far from over. This is climate change, but climate action isn't enough to stop it. We must adapt, too. A thread (1/x). nymag.com/intelligencer/…
The great fires of California’s past marked time generation by generation, horrors lingering in memory for decades before they were surpassed. In recent years, the procession has been annual, horrors arriving nearly every fall. This year, this week, it was day by day...
...the fires blurring into one another from the vantage of anyone far enough away to be following by social media rather than rear-view mirror.
Read 34 tweets
17 Aug
"The official U.S. death toll from coronavirus is now 170,000, and is likely to grow to 227,000 by November. The global toll is 750,000. But those figures may massively underestimate the ultimate public-health trauma." Chronic covid, a thread (1/x): nymag.com/intelligencer/…
"In the spring, our picture of the disease was dominated by hospitalizations, deaths, and recoveries; most Americans following things closely probably understood the full course of illness to last about a month, start to finish."
"Over the last few months, however, we’ve heard more and more stories about coronavirus “long-haulers,” but I don’t think our collective understanding of the disease has properly incorporated those stories, in part because most accounts have been, to this point, anecdotal."
Read 24 tweets
15 Aug
In early May, I wrote about how poorly the U.S. had protected its elderly, particularly in nursing homes, which it could have done easily and cheaply, slicing the pandemic's death toll in half. A clearer picture of that failure emerged this week... (1/x) nymag.com/intelligencer/…
In Politico, a great piece by @MaggieSeverns looked at one set of nursing homes where things were done right: those run by the California Department of Veterans Affairs. politico.com/news/2020/08/1…
"An average nursing home patient in California is 31 times more likely to die from the coronavirus than a resident of a CalVet home," she wrote—31 times more likely. Meaning the common-sense procedures and protocols of the CalVet homes reduced lethality 31-fold.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!