@RichMcHugh It is apparent throughout this thread that the NPs who claim "bashing" are following their usual bullying modus operandi to get the reporter to STFU. It's a f***ing broken record. Investigative reporter with an exceptional pedigree(blew the Harvey Weinstein scandal wide open)
@RichMcHugh 2)reports on families who are complaining about lack of transparency and misrepresentation in healthcare, taking their choice to request someone with a higher level of training. And now have dead children. NPs immediately threaten the station for making THEM look bad and claiming
@RichMcHugh 3)feigned victimhood. All this despite the fact that the anchor compliments NPs and acknowledges their contribution to the pandemic. They ignore all that s**t because being the "victim" is imperative in their attempt to destroy the credibility of this reporter who gave a voice to
@RichMcHugh 4)the parents while no one else gave s**t. Lying about one's credentials should not be defended. The real victims are the dead children and their families. No one is bashing NPs but they sure as f**k are bashing McHugh. The AANP president was not forthcoming--even Helen Keller
@RichMcHugh 5)could see it. That kind of avoidance makes people uneasy-should have gotten a better PR team or someone who could give a better interview. Or just been completely transparent. The fact that the excessive harassment and bullying of this man smacks of an attempt to keep s**t
@RichMcHugh 6)quiet about the SOP issue which is not a rare issue. IT IS COMMON. It stands to reason that with the lack of regulation of online degree mills, non-standardization of NP education and lousy to no oversight of individuals practicing medicine w/o a medical license, there would
@RichMcHugh 7)be consequences. Ms. Thomas did not acknowledge the lousy schools that HAVE BEEN ACCREDITED. Who doesn't know that anyone from an unaccredited school cannot be licensed? Since when is that news? And who decided "the definition of medicine is changing"? Her? And the usual
@RichMcHugh 8)ridiculous mantra that "outcomes" show NPs care is equivalent to physicians which we know is utter BS. She gave a lousy interview and now calls for the station to be vilified and this reporter is being bullied and harassed to death. Leave him the f**k alone, he did not create
@RichMcHugh 9)the problem. He exposed it. Don't kill the messenger. Listen to the message and fix the f***ing problem.
FYI CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS: As most of you may know, AB 890, the bill sponsored by a nutwad dentist who thinks that NPs and physicians are the same, was passed into law on 9/29/20. As is typical with FPA, the plan on how that law will be executed is disorganized. Oversight by a
2)BON who is not only under investigation for falsifying documents, but who also voted against the bill and wanted no part of supervision but were forced, a weak "advisory" committee to the BON which has no enforcement powers whatsoever, a "transition to practice", provided NPs
3)have 3 years of FT "equivalent" work in good standing, (although this requirement can be modified if they have a DNP degree), etc. The legislature made their intent clear: "2837.100. It is the intent of the Legislature that the requirements under this article shall not be an
I want those of you reading this to understand the significance of this request. Physicians are being asked to function as nurses after some "training". Not NPs who are actually RNs. Not CRNAs who are actually CC RNs. Not LVNs. Not EMTs or paramedics. Physicians. Nursing is
2)not an entry-level position, it requires skill. Expertise. Physicians are not trained to be nurses, although there are a few who were nurses prior to becoming physicians. So exactly what training will be provided since it takes a minimum of 2 years to become an RN(AA degree)?
3)That is, real nurses, not the entry-level degree RNs who don't actually work as RNs. So nursing must be pretty easy if anyone can be trained to do it. Why not contact the ANA or the AANP to ask them to put out the word to their membership and request assistance from actual
thehill.com/opinion/health… Here we go again. This time it is the American Academy of Physician Assistants(AAPA)using the pandemic to push their agenda of Optimal Team Practice aka OTP aka practicing medicine w/o a medical license. Same old broken record of "outdated regulations",
2)designed to protect the public, preventing them from practicing at the "top of their license", which to date, remains undefined. Same old tired a**"studies" that show equivalent or better outcomes than the physicians who train them. Studies that anyone with common sense can
3)review and see how poorly done they are. Same old rhetoric of claiming to want "collaborative" practice while their actions say otherwise. All under the guise of helping fill the physician gap when we have much better options such as unmatched U.S., IMG and FMG graduates.
LONG TWEET. The WGN report by Rich McHugh set off a firestorm. The American Association of Nurse Practitioners(AANP) is on the defensive, claiming it disparaged NPs. Doesn't matter that WGN's anchorman clearly stated it was about transparency in health care, which all HCPs should
2)support. Nope, they had to resort to the predictable victimhood role and gaslighting to which we all have become accustomed. No comment about the parents and the fact that they were lied to, didn't even register on their radar. What became apparent after that story is that Full
3)Practice Authority(FPA) aka: "independent" practice aka: practicing medicine w/o a medical license should never have been an option in the U.S., because it represents two-tiered care. Now the AANP has set out to prove they are being discredited because physicians had the
This is why medicine is going into the toilet. FNP takes a liposuction course provided by two Ob/Gyns specializing in cosmetic gynecology. NP is from AZ, a state where NPs can practice "independently". Course is in NJ. FNP "specialty" is an O/P curriculum in primary care-the SOP
2)DOES NOT include surgery. There is no NP program or curriculum that exists for liposuction and fat transfer. This is basically a 2-day course/seminar. But since these docs teaching the course most likely don't know or care about NP SOP and the FNP has no oversight in Arizona,
3)what's to prevent her from practicing surgery w/o a license at her own medspa(renewedmedicalhealth.com)? Not a damn thing. She may claim she is "certified" because of the form she receives for the course/seminar. Who is the certification body? The International Society of
So AB 890 was signed into law by our CA governor, unfortunately. Some may feel as if it is a win, I do not. To clarify, nothing was preventing NPs from caring for the underserved...nothing. The lack of logic to their claims that physicians never work rural/underserved areas but
2)somehow prevented them from doing so did not register with legislators. The thing when one talks BS is you have to remember the lie. It's tough. They have been given license by our legislators to practice medicine w/o a medical license. The irony is the only nursing body to
3)oppose AB 890 was the CA BON who has now been forced to supervise what they did not want nor are equipped to supervise. So a fake-a** "advisory committee" made up of 4 NPs, 2 token physicians and one community member. No idea how members will be selected but I can guarantee you