MGR at the elections. An analysis. Thread coming up.
MGR led the AIADMK to 3 successive election victories. The first was in 1977, right after the Emergency. This was a 4 cornered contest. The alliances were 1) AIADMK + CPI(M) + Forward Bloc 2) DMK 3) Congress _ CPI 4) Janata /1
Results
1 - 144 (130 ADMK, 12 CPIM, 1 FBL, 1 IND)
2 - 48
3 - 32 (INC 27, CPI 5)
4 - 10
Vote share
1 - 33.5% ( ADMK - 30%, CPIM 2.8%)
2 - 24.9%
3 - 20.4%
4 - 16.7%
MGR was initially supportive of the Emergency, while DMK strongly opposed it. DMK could not create a pre-poll /2
alliance with Janata. If they had, they would come back to power. There was no strong anti-Congress wave in TN after the Emergency. Also, Swatantra and the Congress (O) were defunct after the demise of Rajaji and Kamaraj, so there was no means for either of MGR or MK to /3
cobble together a sweeping alliance. If either of Congress or the Janata had teamed up with either of AIADMK or DMK, they would have swept the polls. Reasons
Possibility 1 - Neither MGR nor MK had the expertise to stitch an alliance through negotiation at the time /4
Possibility 2 - MGR and MK were playing 4-dimensional chess and tacitly used this opportunity to sideline national parties in TN. We will rule out Possibility 2 based on the events in the 1980 Assembly election /5
ADMK won in 63 constituencies with DMK as the runner-up. The margin of victory was more than 10,000 votes in half the cases.
DMK won in 27 constituencies with AIADMK as the runner-up. The margin of votes was 2000 or less in 8 of those.
ADMK won in 25 seats with Janata /6
as the runner-up. The margin of votes was < 5000 in 10 of those cases. In the case of DMK/Janata alliance, those would have gone to DMK.
Except for 1 Janata won in most constituencies on a thin margin. A DMK alliance would have ensured all 8 came to the alliance. Also, the /7
Janata-INC head-on contest would have ensured at least 18 seats to the DMK alliance that had < 5000 margin, making a tally of 84 seats at the bare minimum. It was more of MK's failure than MGR's win. The 1980 election is a much more interesting story /8
The Congress and DMK allied in 1980 LS elections to a thumping 38/40-seat victory. The Congress and DMK both had clean vote shares at the time. So, MGR's Govt was dismissed and snap polls called. This resulted in a landslide win for MGR 162/234. /9
MGR was really on a sticky wicket in 1980. Farmers protesting for free electricity under Narayanaswamy Naidu had been fired upon by police and 8 protestors died. Also, MGR introduced a 'creamy layer' for BC quotas, which he withdrew after the LS poll debacle /10
In 1980, AIADMK + CPI + CPIM+ FBL + breakaway Cong factions won162 seats and got 48.9% of the vote. ADMK only got 38%.
DMK + Cong(I) won 69 seats and won 44.4% of the vote.
DMK had 22% of the vote while Cong (I) had 21%. On the face of it, it looks as though MGR increased /11
vote share, DMK & Cong(I) held vote share at Janata's expense.
However, there is a little hidden factor that @sridharkswamy pointed out - Cong(I) stood in 114 seats while DMK stood in 112 seats. MK was ready to let Cong(I) be the major partner, one wonders if he was even /12
ready to let Moopanar be the CM. The sympathy wave for MGR worked probably in all seats where Cong(I) was the main opponent. If MK had not lost out in seat sharing, he could have used the negative sentiment against MGR to win at the polls. This was one more election /13
that MK handed over through poor alliance management. A man like MK must have been scarred by these two opportunities that he let go. It changed him, made him humble, but also sharpened his ambition and made it an obsession. The same obsessive competition was something he /14
carried over into his duel with Jayalalitha that lasted more than a quarter century.
The 1984 election was a nation-wide sympathy landslide. At this time, MGR was in alliance with Rajiv Gandhi's Cong(I) while DMK was stuck with the Janata - a spent force that had only /15
2.8% vote share even in 1980. That was his last election. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Evidence Kathir makes a case for giving reservation benefits for Christian Dalits. Christianity is a good religion, but converts take the evil of Hinduism with them
He compares Malcolm X' move to Islam from Christianity with Ambedkar's conversion with Buddhism.
Vincent Raj aka Evidence Kathir makes a tacit revelation. He says that the 10% EWS quota will benefit almost all OC who apply under it, since the number of applicants and seats under quota will match closely. But SC, MBC, BC reservations will still leave out a lot of applicants
Some factoids that would interest @sankrant
- Calcutta Medical College began with 20 students being taught Western medicine in Bengali medium. Madhusudan Gupta, a Sanskrit student from a family of Ayurvedic Vaidyas, translated Hooper's Anatomy to Bengali.
- The teaching /1
hospital with 30 beds was set up in the Sanskrit College premises, since the traditional Ayurveda Vaidyas were being instructed there.
- Madras Presidency only started a Vernacular Medical College in 1857 to train medical assistants.
- An American Missionary Dr Fishgreen /2
translated 11 medical textbooks to Tamil while serving in Jaffna and began admitting Tamil and Sinhala students in Tamil-medium medical school in 1852.
- In 1826, a medical school was started, with texts translated into Gujarati and Marathi by John McLennan. It was an /3
Let me break down the economics of paurohityam for you. In today's world, the only time you see your family vadhyar Mama is during the annual shraddham. You will probably give 500 each for the 2 bhoktas and 1000 for the vadhyar. That's 2000 per year. Given the number of /1
practicing Brahmin families, the vadhyar's only perennial source of income is the shradhham. Of 100 families, he can be guaranteed of Rs 2 lakhs per annum. This is why the dakshina for vivaha, ayushya homam, sashtiabdapoorthis is so high. Each of these is a once in a lifetime /2
event, same as antyeshti, so he can probably make about 30,000 rupees per event. In an average family, there would be 10 such events in one generation. So, your entire generation will give the vadhyar Mama roughly 3 lakh rupees. How much do you earn in your lifetime again? /3
UP CM Maharaj was gracious to have the shopkeepers released and had senior officials speak to the kid. But this has set a precedent. People who set up crackers shops do not run it year around. They take a loan and purchase crackers less than a month in advance. The shop /1
itself stays for less than a week. After seeing what happened this year, the manufacturers will not take out a loan to make crackers and shopkeepers will not take the risk of stocking firecrackers. Sales volume will automatically go down. We are being given a live lesson in /2
economics how arbitrary application of rules, multiple authorities making rules- SC,HC, NGT, Central and State Governments and local municipal authorities - give rise to regulatory uncertainty and thereby kill industry. Even if we revive the crackers business, we will /3
The ruling dispensation of India, across party lines has a huge inferiority complex and me-too attitude with respect to the West. People in the west spend money on lighting up public spaces for festivals. We will do it too. Soon, firecrackers will be allowed, but as public /1
displays in common space with pyrotechnics provided by municipal bodies. We have ceded individuality in educating children, entertainment. Soon, we will cede individuality in our religion, too. Delhi's grand samoohik Lakshmi Puja is a sign of things to come. In our urge to /2
unify, we are only standardizing, homogenizing and commodifying. It may serve to mobilize the individual and organize them into convenient large groups for fulfilling the purposes of the State, but it removes the individual's quality of life. What we are undergoing is a /3