Perhaps the biggest achievement of western propaganda is to portray exceptional cases in China as structural problems - and structural problems in "democracies" as exceptional cases.
Thus, EVERY problem in China - no matter how rare or unusual - can be blamed on its political system and lack of "democracy" and "freedom".

Meanwhile, systemic problems in the US - literally the result of its system - can be dismissed as one-off cases.

The other companion achievement is to simultaneously portray ALL problems in China - that also occur in EVERY country - as solely due to China's lack of "democracy".

Thus, China's "authoritarianism" can be blamed for EVERY problem, and "democracy" portrayed as the only solution.
There are few better examples of this than COVID-19. The West blamed China's "early missteps" and "mishandling" on its "secrecy" and lack of openness - only to later find that their free, open "democracies" mishandled it exponentially worse than "authoritarian" China. Whoops...
Same with corruption. Corruption in China is blamed solely on China's lack of independent judiciary and free press and freedom of speech and other clichés - yet, many other countries (e.g. India) that ostensibly HAVE all that are as corrupt, if not more, than China. Whoops...
This framework can be applied to every single story about China - from minority issues to regulating fintech companies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maitreya Bhakal

Maitreya Bhakal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MaitreyaBhakal

20 Nov
When talking about China, the conclusion you draw from an observation must be the opposite of what one would normally conclude

Take an observation, and then draw the opposite conclusion from it.

Or, observe what the US does, and then conclude that China did it.

A few examples:
OBSERVATION:
US is the biggest human rights violator in the world, frequently bombing and invading innocent nations, killing civilians and destroying whole communities

CONCLUSION:
US is the global guardian of peace and the leader of human rights
OBSERVATION:
US has interfered in more democratic elections and organized more coups in more sovereign nations than any other country in history

CONCLUSION:
Other countries interfere in US elections
Read 15 tweets
9 Oct
Few thoughts for dealing with the Xinjiang allegations:

1) The burden of proof is ENTIRELY on the accusers

2) Merely saying the proof is insufficient is acceptable - you yourself have to prove NOTHING

3) You don't have to disprove EVERY accusation to discredit the accusers
4) Pointing to the accusers' funding is entirely legitimate. This one point is often enough to discredit them entirely.

After all, the same people who tell us to focus on claims and not funding - also dismiss Chinese media because they're state funded.

Literally EVERY SINGLE CLAIM can be traced back to shady orgs funded by Western govts and corporations - the same ones who gave us Iraq WMDs and the Nayirah testimony.

The western media loves harping about editorial independence. Yet, in this case, they've failed their own test.
Read 13 tweets
3 Aug
All nations are hypocrites. Nobody cares about inconveniences such as the "law" or "WTO guidelines" - mere formalities to be brushed aside for one's national interest.

Some are more hypocritical than others. US infinitely more than China, but that doesn't mean China is a saint.
China has every right to do what it wants within its borders. But so do other nations.

China can't be a bitch about it when others do the same.

China (and its propaganda) should grow up.



Token statements are OK, excessive whining is not. A thread:
China:
"We banned FB and Twitter because they didn't comply with Chinese law. What US law did TikTok violate?"

US:
"What law did Norway violate when they gave Nobel prize to Liu Xiaobo? What law does one violate by meeting the Dalai Lama? What law did Australia violate?

China: Image
Read 7 tweets
8 Jul
China's propaganda machine is to propaganda what the US war machine is to war: Perpetual Losers.

US loses military battles even with conventional advantages on its side, while China loses PR battles even with the truth on its side.

Two recent examples illustrate this perfectly:
The first is the Taiwan/WHO fiasco, when Taiwan lied that it "warned" the WHO of human-to-human transmission before China did. The media spread the lie.

China utterly failed to capitalize on this incident, even though it was right the whole time:

The other is the Sino-Indian border dispute. China's refusal to even slightly exploit the package deal it offered to India multiple times - with India refusing each time - is astonishing.

Imagine how much China could shift the discourse with this tactic.

Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
What's more hypocritical - the US considering banning TikTok, or China complaining about it?

😂😂
Apparently, China wants to live in a world where it can ban whatever it wants, but other nations are wrong to ban Chinese products.

That's not how the world works. When even relatively quieter nations like India can do it, why not downright genocidal ones like the US?
One can always argue that if the US is hypocritical about things like human rights - why can't China be hypocritical about product bans?

(I call it the hypocrisy of being a hypocrite 😂)

It can. Yet, it'll change little on the ground. Rhetoric matters, but only up to a point.
Read 4 tweets
1 Jul
Schrodinger's China:

China is both a threat to world's peace, and on the verge of collapse.
Schrodinger's response to COVID-19:

China's response is both delayed and riddled with missteps - and is also an over-reaction, massive in scale, and ruthlessly effective:

Schrodinger's Xi Jinping:

Xi Jinping is both "Chairman of Everything" and China's "most authoritarian leader in decades" - and is also always facing heavy criticisms and threats to his rule.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!