Perhaps the biggest achievement of western propaganda is to portray exceptional cases in China as structural problems - and structural problems in "democracies" as exceptional cases.
Thus, EVERY problem in China - no matter how rare or unusual - can be blamed on its political system and lack of "democracy" and "freedom".
Meanwhile, systemic problems in the US - literally the result of its system - can be dismissed as one-off cases.
The other companion achievement is to simultaneously portray ALL problems in China - that also occur in EVERY country - as solely due to China's lack of "democracy".
Thus, China's "authoritarianism" can be blamed for EVERY problem, and "democracy" portrayed as the only solution.
There are few better examples of this than COVID-19. The West blamed China's "early missteps" and "mishandling" on its "secrecy" and lack of openness - only to later find that their free, open "democracies" mishandled it exponentially worse than "authoritarian" China. Whoops...
Same with corruption. Corruption in China is blamed solely on China's lack of independent judiciary and free press and freedom of speech and other clichés - yet, many other countries (e.g. India) that ostensibly HAVE all that are as corrupt, if not more, than China. Whoops...
This framework can be applied to every single story about China - from minority issues to regulating fintech companies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When talking about China, the conclusion you draw from an observation must be the opposite of what one would normally conclude
Take an observation, and then draw the opposite conclusion from it.
Or, observe what the US does, and then conclude that China did it.
A few examples:
OBSERVATION:
US is the biggest human rights violator in the world, frequently bombing and invading innocent nations, killing civilians and destroying whole communities
CONCLUSION:
US is the global guardian of peace and the leader of human rights
OBSERVATION:
US has interfered in more democratic elections and organized more coups in more sovereign nations than any other country in history
CONCLUSION:
Other countries interfere in US elections
Literally EVERY SINGLE CLAIM can be traced back to shady orgs funded by Western govts and corporations - the same ones who gave us Iraq WMDs and the Nayirah testimony.
The western media loves harping about editorial independence. Yet, in this case, they've failed their own test.
All nations are hypocrites. Nobody cares about inconveniences such as the "law" or "WTO guidelines" - mere formalities to be brushed aside for one's national interest.
Some are more hypocritical than others. US infinitely more than China, but that doesn't mean China is a saint.
China has every right to do what it wants within its borders. But so do other nations.
China can't be a bitch about it when others do the same.
Token statements are OK, excessive whining is not. A thread:
China:
"We banned FB and Twitter because they didn't comply with Chinese law. What US law did TikTok violate?"
US:
"What law did Norway violate when they gave Nobel prize to Liu Xiaobo? What law does one violate by meeting the Dalai Lama? What law did Australia violate?
China's propaganda machine is to propaganda what the US war machine is to war: Perpetual Losers.
US loses military battles even with conventional advantages on its side, while China loses PR battles even with the truth on its side.
Two recent examples illustrate this perfectly:
The first is the Taiwan/WHO fiasco, when Taiwan lied that it "warned" the WHO of human-to-human transmission before China did. The media spread the lie.
China utterly failed to capitalize on this incident, even though it was right the whole time:
The other is the Sino-Indian border dispute. China's refusal to even slightly exploit the package deal it offered to India multiple times - with India refusing each time - is astonishing.
Imagine how much China could shift the discourse with this tactic.
Xi Jinping is both "Chairman of Everything" and China's "most authoritarian leader in decades" - and is also always facing heavy criticisms and threats to his rule.