There were 10,097 ballots received during the grace period: 9,428 postmarked by 11/3 and 669 with missing/illegible postmarks.
Those 10K ballots aren’t currently included in the certified totals for the presidential and congressional races, (though they are for the state ones.)
Why isn’t PA Dept of State including them? Spokesperson:
“SCOTUS ordered counties to strictly segregate these ballots, and it was determined that they would be most clearly segregated by not adding them to the totals until further action by the court.”
That’s weird and maybe wrong, some lawyers and experts said, bc the PA Supreme Court order hasn’t been specifically blocked or overturned:
Anyway, if these ballots won’t change any outcomes, why do they matter beyond the individual rights of those voters?
Because they’re still being challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court, and the question is a potentially really big one.
The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked about the powers of state legislatures to determine how elections are run, and the powers and roles of others, including the state courts.
I won’t get too deep into it here (plus I’m not the expert), but if you want to get into it, what you’ll want to research is “independent state legislature doctrine”, e.g. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
The U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures the power to determine how congressional elections are run and presidential electors are chosen.
The question is, does that literally mean legislatures specifically? Not states generally, or the whole lawmaking process?
The PA legislature determined the rules for the election, including the mail ballot deadline.
The PA Supreme Court extended the deadline.
That violates the Constitution, the PA GOP argues, by taking the legislature’s power to decide election rules.
You can see why that might seem appealing for PA Republicans, especially heading into a redistricting year in which some of them fear their maps could end up at a majority-Democrat state Supreme Court.
Remember, after the PA Supreme Court drew a new congressional map in 2018, top Republican lawmakers (who control state leg) asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block it, saying the state court was taking the legislature’s U.S. Constitutional right to determine how elections are run.
But an interpretation that state legislatures — meaning specifically the state legislatures, and nothing else — have power of elections would have massive ramifications, experts say. Imagine if state courts can no longer get involved. Or what happens if the governor vetoes?
The U.S. Supreme Court will discuss the PA mail ballot deadline cases Jan. 8 to decide whether to take them.
They’ll likely tell us the next Monday morning, Jan. 11, whether they’re gonna take up the cases.
Confused? I was. Talked to a few experts, and here’s my basic takeaway:
This might change some of the road to get there, but the result is basically unchanged: Congress will meet Jan. 6, receive the Electoral College votes, and Joe Biden will be inaugurated as president Jan. 20.
This string of lies, falsehoods, and outlandish conspiracy theories is untethered to reality.
The campaign and its allies have had dozens of opportunities to present evidence and make these claims in court. They didn’t, and they lost — the election and the lawsuits.
Pennsylvania Republican lawmakers, including House Speaker Bryan Cutler and House Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, have sent a letter to the state’s congressional delegation urging them to object to PA’s Electoral College votes on Jan. 6.
PA GOP lawmakers: “3 U.S.C. §15, empowers Congress to reject electoral votes that are not ‘regularly given’ or ‘lawfully certified.’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College.”
The PA GOP lawmakers also sent a letter calling on @JoshShapiroPA “to appoint an independent prosecutor to review these election irregularities, to ensure the statutes governing our elections were not violated, and to make recommendations to [legislature]” pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/…
The PA Supreme Court dismisses the case brought by U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly that sought to overturn last year’s law creating no-excuse mail voting and to throw out those mail ballots cast in this election.
This is the case the Commonwealth Court had earlier blocked certification in.
Here’s the concurring and dissenting statement from Chief Justice Saylor, which Justice Mundy joins:
Here’s the concurring statement from Justice Wecht (pages 1–4):
Rudy Giuliani made this absolutely absurd, untrue claim about PA mailing out 1.8M ballots but counting 2.5M, and now people really believe it and think there’s obvious fraud being ignored.
Hard to know the right way to fight back against this stuff sometimes. Sigh.
“They had an armed guard that stopped us first, they had magnetometers, and they had uniformed police officers who threatened to arrest us if we went in.”
Sounds like a high level of security around the ballot-counting process.
“I presented that order to both the chairman of the board of elections”
The chair, Lisa Deeley, is a woman. Her deputy says Lewandowski “never spoke to Lisa.”