Remember the PA mail ballot deadline extension that the state Supreme Court ordered and PA GOP appealed to SCOTUS?

Those 10K ballots are stuck in purgatory, left out of the certified totals.

They won’t change any outcomes, but here’s why they matter:
inquirer.com/politics/elect…
There were 10,097 ballots received during the grace period: 9,428 postmarked by 11/3 and 669 with missing/illegible postmarks.

Those 10K ballots aren’t currently included in the certified totals for the presidential and congressional races, (though they are for the state ones.)
Why isn’t PA Dept of State including them? Spokesperson:

“SCOTUS ordered counties to strictly segregate these ballots, and it was determined that they would be most clearly segregated by not adding them to the totals until further action by the court.”
That’s weird and maybe wrong, some lawyers and experts said, bc the PA Supreme Court order hasn’t been specifically blocked or overturned: Screenshot of paragraphs in...
Anyway, if these ballots won’t change any outcomes, why do they matter beyond the individual rights of those voters?

Because they’re still being challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court, and the question is a potentially really big one.
The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked about the powers of state legislatures to determine how elections are run, and the powers and roles of others, including the state courts.
I won’t get too deep into it here (plus I’m not the expert), but if you want to get into it, what you’ll want to research is “independent state legislature doctrine”, e.g. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
The U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures the power to determine how congressional elections are run and presidential electors are chosen.

The question is, does that literally mean legislatures specifically? Not states generally, or the whole lawmaking process?
The PA legislature determined the rules for the election, including the mail ballot deadline.

The PA Supreme Court extended the deadline.

That violates the Constitution, the PA GOP argues, by taking the legislature’s power to decide election rules.
You can see why that might seem appealing for PA Republicans, especially heading into a redistricting year in which some of them fear their maps could end up at a majority-Democrat state Supreme Court.
Remember, after the PA Supreme Court drew a new congressional map in 2018, top Republican lawmakers (who control state leg) asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block it, saying the state court was taking the legislature’s U.S. Constitutional right to determine how elections are run.
But an interpretation that state legislatures — meaning specifically the state legislatures, and nothing else — have power of elections would have massive ramifications, experts say. Imagine if state courts can no longer get involved. Or what happens if the governor vetoes?
The U.S. Supreme Court will discuss the PA mail ballot deadline cases Jan. 8 to decide whether to take them.

They’ll likely tell us the next Monday morning, Jan. 11, whether they’re gonna take up the cases.

Stay tuned!

inquirer.com/politics/elect…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Lai 🙊 賴柏羽

Jonathan Lai 🙊 賴柏羽 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Elaijuh

14 Dec
Pennsylvania’s 20 electors are meeting now in Harrisburg, as Joe Biden officially defeats Donald Trump in the Electoral College.

With @JuliaTerruso: inquirer.com/politics/elect… Screenshot showing members of the Electoral College standingScreenshot showing Justice Max Baer speaking at the podium.Screenshot showing PA Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar stanScreenshot showing State Sen. Sharif Street speaking from th
In PA and some other states Biden won, Republicans also gathered today to cast their own, separate Electoral College votes.

The @PAGOP put out this release on the GOP electors meeting “to cast a conditional vote” for Trump:

Confused? I was. Talked to a few experts, and here’s my basic takeaway:

This might change some of the road to get there, but the result is basically unchanged: Congress will meet Jan. 6, receive the Electoral College votes, and Joe Biden will be inaugurated as president Jan. 20.
Read 20 tweets
13 Dec
This string of lies, falsehoods, and outlandish conspiracy theories is untethered to reality.

The campaign and its allies have had dozens of opportunities to present evidence and make these claims in court. They didn’t, and they lost — the election and the lawsuits.
The continued attacks on Philadelphia and other major cities simply don’t make sense if you’re looking at the actual numbers.

(Of course, the attacks might be based on some other characteristics of those cities.)

Biden kinda underperformed in Philly: inquirer.com/politics/elect…
The suburbs, not Philly, were the big key to Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania.

inquirer.com/politics/elect…
Read 4 tweets
4 Dec
Pennsylvania Republican lawmakers, including House Speaker Bryan Cutler and House Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, have sent a letter to the state’s congressional delegation urging them to object to PA’s Electoral College votes on Jan. 6.

pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/… Screenshots of the letter l...Image
PA GOP lawmakers: “3 U.S.C. §15, empowers Congress to reject electoral votes that are not ‘regularly given’ or ‘lawfully certified.’ The aforementioned conduct has undermined the lawful certification of Pennsylvania’s delegation to the Electoral College.”
The PA GOP lawmakers also sent a letter calling on @JoshShapiroPA “to appoint an independent prosecutor to review these election irregularities, to ensure the statutes governing our elections were not violated, and to make recommendations to [legislature]”
pahousegopnews.com/AttachedFiles/… Screenshot of the letter li...
Read 4 tweets
28 Nov
The PA Supreme Court dismisses the case brought by U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly that sought to overturn last year’s law creating no-excuse mail voting and to throw out those mail ballots cast in this election.

This is the case the Commonwealth Court had earlier blocked certification in. Screenshot of the order, which I believe will soon be availa
Here’s the concurring and dissenting statement from Chief Justice Saylor, which Justice Mundy joins: These four images are screenshots of the concurring and diss
Here’s the concurring statement from Justice Wecht (pages 1–4): These are screenshots of the concurring statement, which is
Read 7 tweets
27 Nov
Rudy Giuliani made this absolutely absurd, untrue claim about PA mailing out 1.8M ballots but counting 2.5M, and now people really believe it and think there’s obvious fraud being ignored.

Hard to know the right way to fight back against this stuff sometimes. Sigh. Screenshot of email that reads as follows:  “Is one of you
The exact numbers being cited — 1,823,148 mail ballots sent and 1,462,403 returned — are from the PRIMARY election in June.

Specifically, they are from this dataset: data.pa.gov/Government-Eff…

Read 4 tweets
15 Nov
A few thoughts from watching this clip President Donald Trump RTd of Lewandowski talking about vote-counting in Philly.
“They had an armed guard that stopped us first, they had magnetometers, and they had uniformed police officers who threatened to arrest us if we went in.”

Sounds like a high level of security around the ballot-counting process.
“I presented that order to both the chairman of the board of elections”

The chair, Lisa Deeley, is a woman. Her deputy says Lewandowski “never spoke to Lisa.”
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!