A few comments on endpoints for COVID vaccine trials. For regulators, the main question when considering effectiveness is whether the vaccine reduces the risk of symptomatic COVID.
But there are two other relevant questions - whether a vaccine prevents severe disease, and whether it prevents transmission.
For the question of symptomatic COVID, the endpoint of interest is symptomatic confirmed COVID. (there are actually two definitions of this - the European ECDC and US CDC, with slightly different symptom lists - both are collected).
Symptomatic confirmed COVID is the primary endpoint, meaning that the study is designed to answer this question specifically. This is the "headline" result we have seen reported from phase 3 studies.
The question of whether the vaccine prevents severe COVID is important, as there had been some concern that some immune responses could make disease worse.
Although the numbers of patients who are hospitalised are much smaller, the numbers from the published trials are falling in the right direction - fewer, or no hospitalised patients in the vaccine arm.
Whether the vaccine prevents transmission isn't a simple question to answer. There are three potential ways to look at this - the best would be to look at infection rates in the close contacts of those in the study.
But this would turn a 40,000 patient study into a 150,000-plus person study. This would be difficult, and obviously household members could still get infection from someone other than the study participant.
A second way to answer this is to look at asymptomatic infection - for example, in the AstraZeneca trial, they did weekly swabs on participants in some trials.
They found that there were slightly lower rates of asymptomatic infection in the vaccine group (29/3288) vs the control group (40/3350). thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Moderna also did a pre-dose 2 swab and found prevalence lower in the vaccinated group (14/14134) than the placebo group (38/14073). fda.gov/media/144453/d…
Note that even if there is little protection against asymptomatic infection, it doesn't mean that the vaccine mightn't still reduce transmission.
If vaccination only turned symptomatic infections into asymptomatic infections, that would be an issue, but a reduction in overall infection (symptomatic + asymptomatic) is probably a good thing.
It is also thought that those who are truly asymptomatic (that is, those who never get symptoms) are probably less infectious, but this needs to be confirmed in the context of vaccination.
A third way to answer this is to do serology to look for infections in those who didn't have PCR positive COVID.
Obviously the usual serology based on the spike protein would be affected by the vaccine, but it is possible to do serology using non-vaccine components (eg N-binding). This is planned in the Pfizer study, but I haven't seen results yet. pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/C45910…
In summary, we primarily want a vaccine to prevent people getting sick and going to hospital. Whether the vaccine prevents transmission is an important question - early data from Moderna and AstraZeneca hints that overall infection may be reduced, but more work is required.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. There are a lot of candidate vaccines in development, but we still have a long way to go.
Vaccines work by training the immune system on a virus or a component that doesn't cause disease, so that it can respond more efficiently when it sees the real thing.
For SARS2, there are many different approaches being tried. These can be classed into 4 main groups - inactivated/live attenuated, protein subunits, viral vectors and nucleic acid vaccines.
SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients that don't have symptoms. It's complicated. A thread.
Data suggest that viral load does start to increase and is maximal slightly before the onset of symptoms, although there is clearly a lot of variation between patients. nature.com/articles/s4159…
Although it can be hard to pinpoint the exact time of transmission, it also appears that transmission can occur from people with infection before the onset of symptoms.
There are many criticisms and anomalies, but a few notes about the Australian data. The authors reported 609 admissions and 73 deaths in 5 Australian hospitals on 21 April.
Curiously, no Australian data were included in a previous paper on cardiovascular disease by the same authors in the @NEJM (10.1056/NEJMoa2007621) using the same database to 28 March
Where are we now in Australia and what might we expect next? Over the last week, there have been about 20 cases/day reported across Australia, but jurisdictions other than NSW and VIC have very small numbers of cases.
NSW cases relate mainly to the outbreak at Newmarch House aged care facility, and Victoria to Cedar Meats, with secondary transmissions from this cluster. abc.net.au/news/2020-05-0…
The PM has announced a 3 step plan to start easing restrictions, with the jurisdictions setting the timeline. It is likely that we'll have to wait at least 3-4 weeks between steps to monitor on what's going on.
There is often confusion about the terms eradication, elimination and control, and these terms are particularly confusing when applied to COVID. who.int/bulletin/volum…
Eradication is the permanent reduction to zero of the worldwide incidence of infection. This was achieved for smallpox - we no longer need smallpox vaccination. This isn't going to happen anytime soon for SARS-CoV-2.
Elimination is the reduction to zero of the incidence of disease or infection in a defined geographical area. This implies that continued intervention measures are required to prevent re-emergence and re-establishment of transmission.
About how the Australian COVIDSafe app helps with contact tracing. A thread.
This is from the perspective of an epidemiologist - I don't have any expertise on the technical or privacy aspects. health.gov.au/resources/apps…
Contact tracing is a manual process. The local state/territory health department routinely calls up people that have been diagnosed with COVID once they are notified.
The first step is to define the infective period - currently defined as 48 hours before symptoms developed until the time the case is called and advised to isolate.