🚨🚨LET'S PLAY A GAME. It's called "Which Election." I'll show tweets from elections Trump claimed fraud after he or guy he supported lost. The game: Guess which race!
...when they try to overthrow democracy because Trump says "fraud" for the millionth time.
The rules: You get 1 point if you guess the year. On difficult ones, I will give a second point if you guess the race.
AND HEEERRRE WE GO WITH THE GAME "WHICH ELECTION"..../2
...Let's start with a toughy. This is from a series of tweets proclaiming how voters should react because the person declared the winner only won through fraud..../3
...Now, again, some of these have no specifics of who the person is who ran - could be Trump, could be someone else - so don't assume you know who he's talking about. What's the year for this one? And I will give an extra point for what race?.../4
....next, you just get a point for what year. But, tell me which race too!.../5
...some folks are looking at tweets from different years and responding with "Meh. It's 2020. Duh" And EVERY TIME I have seen them, the answer has been wrong! So be careful! Many sound exactly the same, year after year.
Ok, what year? And another point for which race?.../6
...Now, the previous tweet had a claim of fraud in Arizona, this one he tries for a trifecta. And it also throws in an attack on the media for not reporting his conspiracy theories. What year?.../7
...I'm looking at responses. Again, a caution! Just because a tweet sounds the same as what he says in 2020, dont assume it's 2020. It usually isn't!
Ok, an old faithful - machines flipping votes. What's the year? And I'll give a second point if you name the race.../8
...this one is not a tweet, and also a super duper toughy. So, this is a 3 pointer! One pointy for the year, two points for the race!.../9
...now, this one is hard to edit so that it blocks that this is about someone who Trump supported. So, there's that hint. But it is also a reaaallly tough one. It includes another old faithful: People voting over and over. One point for the year, THREE points for the race..../10
...intermission. And we take a short one-tweet break, let's remember the time in high school when Trump decided that, because the kid next to him got a higher grade on a test than Donny, he must have cheated...
...now, back to our game. A quick reminder with this one: Trump ran for the Reform Party nomination in 2000 (and still bitches about that one), also there are many primaries in 2016, and the general election in 2020. This one is another "give proof it didn't happen!" fraud.../13
...there have been a lot of tough ones. So I'll let up here. For the Trump aficionados, this one should be easy, and I will be generous. Name the year and the race, one point each!.../14
..just for laughs, a quick reminder. Looney-tunes also said, repeatedly, that the Emmys were rigged against him. I didnt hide the date and no points for this one because he said it EVERY YEAR from 2005-2012. There practically is no wrong answer..../15
...another one. Remember! I am also including tweets of "fraud!" claims when people he supported lost..../16
...thats the game! The answers start on the next tweet, total up your score and give it on the last tweet, which will be noted as "GIVE YOUR SCORE HERE!" A big failure if you guessed 2020 more than once. Each answer will be for number I gave my tweet, so it starts with 3....
... 3. 2012, Obama v. Romney. 1 point for the date. 4. Same as above. 1 point for date, 1 for race... 5. 2020. This morning. 1 point for date 6. A big fooler. "Signatures don't match." 2012 AGAIN! Obama v. Romney. 1 point for date, 1 for race...
... 7. 2016. This is AFTER Trump won. He is explaining how fraud was the only reason he lost California, Virginia and New Hampshire. 1 point for date. 8. 2012. Voting machines flipping vote conspiracy theory, with flip from Romney to Obama. 1 point for date, 1 for race...
... 9. This was a tough one. 2018, Democratic primary in New York’s 12th District. This one was "mail in votes fraud, rerun the election." 1 point for date, 2 for the race....
... 10. The toughest of all. 2012, the Scottish vote for Scot of the Year. Trump supported one guy, another who slammed his golf course won. This has the "multiple voting" conspiracy theory. 1 point for date, 3 for race....
... 11. Intermission 12. No question. Oops. 13. 2016: when he lost the popular vote, asking media to prove it wasn't fraud. 1 point for date....
14. A classic. 2016, Trump accuses @tedcruz of committing fraud because Trump lost the Iowa Caucuses. I was generous: One point for year, one for race. 15. The Emmys. No points 16. 2016. Another "Cruz cheated" tweet. One point for date....
..Total up your results, & GIVE YOUR SCORE HERE! Show it in comment on this tweet, honor system - which means Trump cant play. Winner gets this lovely trophy: 🏆
So join us next time for "WHICH ELECTION," where we laugh at Trump's inability to lose without screaming fraud.
end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
By the way, @Mattgaetz -please also investigate @tedcruz, who Trump said committed fraud in '16 Iowa Caucuses. And the '16 NH vote. And Virginia vote. And CA vote. And Scot of Year award in 2012. And Emmys, 05-10. Because Trump lost all those & said it was fraud/rigged each time.
...wait, @mattgaetz - I left out some. Trump also said the Nobel Prizes were rigged (2018, 2019), the Reform Party nomination process was rigged (2000), an analyst's report saying his casino was in trouble was a fraud (1990), a loss of a casino contract was a fraud (1989).../2
...not done yet, @mattgaetz. You see, the problem is, the guy you are kowtowing to to destroy yourself in history as a guy who attracked democracy has screamed fraud every time he has lost in the 33 years I've known him. So let's keep going.../3
Why @GOP is killing us. It is more than COVID denialism. Its their inability to get how everything connects. Sure, providing desperately relief in the COVID outbreak is needed as humanitarian act. But it's more than that. People need to stay home & businesses need to survive.../1
...if people can't afford to stay home, they wont. If small businesses can't survive without income, they will open if they can. If people who are unemployed dont have enough to survive, they will be seeking work. Dumbass @LindseyGrahamSC slammed unemployment boost in this....
...saying "Well, people just won't seek out work." In adapted words of John McLain, "No fucking shit, @LindseyGrahamSC!" Thats the whole idea. If we shut down, and gave people and small businesses what they need to survive - not big corporations, not billionaires - we could.../3
If our government communicated real public health information, this would not be necessary.
COVID is NOT a respiratory disease. That is why it is nothing like the flu. It is a vascular disease. Look at the blood splatters in this room. A 13 year old boy died of COVID there.../1
...blood on the floor, on the walls, on the machines, all from a child in his final minutes of life. His mom, a medical professional, put this photo out to try & get people to understand: THIS IS NOT THE FUCKING FLU. What happens with COVID is not that your lungs are loaded.../2
...with virus. COVID creates blood clots in your vessels. All over your body. Thats why they are finding heart damage, kidney damage, brain damage. It's also why people who, when COVID positive, can die on airplane flights...washingtonpost.com/travel/2020/12…
Why Trump's pardon-a-thon is stupid. Under Burdick v. US, anyone who accepts a pardon - even these "not gonna tell you what for" pardons - is confessing to a federal crime. Any of them who accept, whether the CFO or @IvankaTrump or anyone, will be asked in civil depositions...
...what federal crimes they committed that led to a pardon. If they say "none" then the pardon should be void (hard to tell, because preemptive pardons have never been done before.) Then, @POTUS can be deposed and asked what he was pardoning these people for having done.../2
...if he doesnt identify one, there is a strong argument under Burdick that - if the president didnt know what he was pardoning someone for, there is no valid pardon. A pardon is not a blanket to prevent prosecution of cronies. If they do acknowledge a crime, that can be used../3
If you think Snowden should be pardoned, you don't know all he did. He disclosed secrets to China: our surveillance for gathering info on its nuke program was instantly destroyed. So Russia shut down arms talks cause they knew we were blind on China.../1 vanityfair.com/news/2013/06/e…
...in other words, just that ONE thing destabilized global nuclear arms control. Why? Either because he is some stupid arrogant schmuck who didn't know what he was revealing, or he was a spy all along. Why tell China OUR secrets? He revealed.../2
..our surveillance through Pacnet EAC-C2C fiber-optic submarine cable network in Asia. That, too, was wrecked. We lost surveillance abilities of communications between Hong Kong, China, Korea, Taiwan, etc. Did we miss info that night have helped with HK democracy movement?../3
Isn't it interesting how no conservatives objected to this conservative *man* who wrote books attacking liberals since he calls himself "doctor" because of his PhD in business? Hmmmm...
....hmmmm...and look here. He calls himself "Dr. Kissinger" too. Yet such silence by the Dinesh Dsouzas of of the world for decades....
...hmmm...and look here. Former Texas Senator Phil Gramm not only calls himself Dr., but even made sure that the award in his name had the honorific Dr. in it...