Folks, this is the single dumbest election lawsuit of the entire cycle, and I've read kraken filings front to back.
No, I'm not going to walk you through this one with screenshots. It is 115 pages, and 400+ paragraphs, of unalloyed, unfiltered, uncut stupidity
This is stupidity as it would be if Jesse & Heisenberg were cooking it. Sydney Powell and Lin Wood stay up at night dreaming of perhaps, if they really work at it, someday coming close to the levels of legal incoherence that Erick Kaardal has accomplished here
They have managed to pull together a truly impressive roster of plaintiffs without standing, to sue a bunch of Defendants not subject to jurisdiction in Washington D.C., one for the minor reason that IT DOESN'T EXIST.

Seriously
They named "the Electoral College" as a defendant, and pretended it had an address at the US Capitol building.

Never have I so looked forward to reading an affidavit of service
(For those who don't know - to start a lawsuit, you need to not only file a complaint but formally serve it on the defendants. Once you do, you file affidavits of service detailing how the party was served. I'd love to see what that would look like here)
Ok, one screenshot tweet
This is generally the portion of your complaint where you would allege facts explaining how the defendants are subject to jurisdiction in the court you're suing in. They just basically went with
The substance of the claims is as stupid as anything we've seen this cycle: apparently, legislatures passing election status calling for executive branch officials to certify results is unconstitutional
It not only violates article 2,but voters have equal protection and due process rights to have legislatures - and legislatures alone - certify election results?
Also, this is apparently only true in swing states that voted for Biden. The rest of the country that does that? You're fine
And they definitely couldn't have raised this tooth fairy of a claim before the elections. I mean how were they supposed to know which states to sue until they saw where biden won?
I can't even get angry about this one, truly. It's like watching a squirrel trying to drive a car.

All I can feel is amazement at what I'm seeing. And pity.
Just point, laugh, and walk away

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Akiva Cohen

Akiva Cohen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AkivaMCohen

24 Dec
Oh, for fuck's sake, Seth. Can't you take like two weeks off from misinforming people about the law?

Almost every word of this thread is wrong, starting from its fundamental premise. The Pardon Clause does NOT the PARDON power that way
Here's what the Pardon Clause says: the President "shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."
It does NOT say "except where the offense is relevant to the impeachment of someone else" or "except where the pardon will obstruct someone else's impeachment"
Read 38 tweets
23 Dec
In the cold light of morning, I'm still completely amazed by the legal belly flop that @ThomasMoreSoc filed in the DC District Court. It's the legal equivalent of watching the butt fumble, live

EVERYTHING you could possibly get wrong in a complaint, they managed
Start with the plaintiffs. The ONLY claims in the lawsuit are that the Constitution gives state legislatures the right to set the manner of elections, which they have allegedly (we'll get to this insanity) failed to do.
There's oodles of caselaw saying "since that's a right of the state legislature, only state legislatures, as a body, can bring such a claim"

Are the plaintiffs state legislatures?
Read 34 tweets
20 Dec
ahahahahahahahahahahahah *deep breath, repeat ad infinitum*

They are appealing their trio of losses in Pennsylvania to the US Supreme Court. Cases decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on November 23, November 17, and OCTOBER 23
The argument in all three cases is identical: Bush v. Gore says that you can overrule the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on issues of Pennsylvania election law
They waited until a month and a half after the election, and until after the Electors had voted, to file a petition asking SCOTUS to review.

Despite one of these cases having been decided a week and a half BEFORE the election
Read 58 tweets
20 Dec
You are ignoring that there's a push-pull between "death prevention" and "spread prevention" in the vaccine roll out and that vaccinating younger people will do more to mitigate spread than vaccinating older people.

Preexisting conditions may simply shift the balance
In other words: vaccinating the elderly? Mitigates deaths way more than spread.

The healthy young? Mitigates spread way more than deaths

Younger people with preexisting conditions? Mitigates death (more than healthy young, less than elderly) AND spread (vice versa)
But yes, @NateSilver538, you've reviewed the data from the research, therefore you have the skills to understand how that data should translate into prioritization decisions in a vaccine roll out
Read 5 tweets
20 Dec
Seriously people. Executive orders mean exactly nothing to what Trump legally can or can't do to fuck with the election results (which is zero). Stop letting idiots make you crazy
There are two very simple, very basic reasons executive orders are meaningless here. Understand them, please
1) the president cannot issue an executive order that grants himself a power he does not already have. For example, the president could not issue an executive order saying that from now on he can make laws they don't need to pass Congress
Read 9 tweets
18 Dec
LOLOL. They just keep finding new ways to screw up
Here's the motion to expedite, my disaster-tourist #Squidigation fan friends

supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/2…
Sid and Lin finally noticed that the briefing schedule wasn't going to work. Of course, the Court won't act on their idiocy anyway.

I also love the suggestion that maybe Congress will just pass on confirming the election of President Biden (or anyone)
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!