It's important to remember that a presidential pardon reduces the ability of the recipient to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
If you have been pardoned for federal offenses, you can no longer invoke the possibility you might be prosecuted for those offenses as a basis for refusing to testify, since the pardon bars that possibility.
And the pardon of course cannot bar prosecution for perjury in testimony compelled after the issuance of the pardon.
It would still be possible to assert the Fifth as to the possibility of incrimination under state law, since a federal pardon does not cover state offenses.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Many have been shocked by the silence —and even support—of so many elected members of the GOP in response to Trump’s increasingly outlandish claims. But their behavior isn’t at all surprising to social psychologists: ...."
"It’s a perfect demonstration of how toxic environments grow gradually, as problematic behavior starts with something small that then continues and expands."
"Real-world cases of corporate fraud provide similar evidence of the slippery slope of problematic behavior. Interviews with financial executives indicted for accounting fraud reveal that their conduct in virtually all cases escalated gradually." amp.usatoday.com/amp/3989411001…
The importance of this is that, in order for an objection to an electoral vote certificate to be considered, it must be made by at least one member of each chamber.
It was on this basis--the failure of any senators to sign objections made by members of the House--that Vice President Biden, presiding as president of the Senate, was able to summarily swat away objections ...
... made by some House Democrats to some of the electoral votes cast for Trump in the 2016 election. c-span.org/video/?421237-…
In 1960, after an initial count showed that the Republican candidate for president had won the state by 115 votes, the Republican governor of Hawaii initially certified a slate of Republican electors. dorfonlaw.org/2020/12/stephe…
But after a recount changed the result in Democratic candidate's favor (he ultimately won by 141 votes), the governor transmitted a second certification, in favor of the Democratic electors, who were pledged to their candidate, John F. Kennedy. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_Unit…
When the matter got to Congress in January for the official counting of the electors votes, the presiding officer accepted the Democratic votes from Hawaii and rejected the Republican ones, even though both had been certified by the governor. dorfonlaw.org/2020/12/stephe…