Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Jonathan Casey Profile picture
@JonathanTCasey
Dec 25, 2020 • 41 tweets • 21 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
This thread will debunk "the judges didn't look at evidence" nonsense that has been going around.

Over and over again, judges have gone out of their way to listen to the evidence and dismantle it, enjoy the carnage!

1/
Bowyer v. Ducey (Sidney Powell's case in Arizona)

"Plaintiffs have not moved the
needle for their fraud theory from conceivable to plausible"

This is a great opinion to start with. The Judge completely dismantles the nonsense brought before her.

2/
democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImageImageImage
King vs. Whitmer (Michigan, Sidney Powell case)

"Nothing but speculation and conjecture"

This is a good one to show people who think affidavits are good evidence. Notice how the affidavits don't actually say they saw fraud happen in Detroit.

3/
democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImageImage
Trump v. Benson (Michigan)

"hearsay within hearsay"

Another good one to show people who think affidavits are absolute proof.

4/
democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… Image
Stoddard v. City Election Commission (Michigan)

"mere speculation"

/5

democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImageImage
Law v. Whitmer (Nevada case backed by the Trump Campaign)

Literally the last four pages just show the utter lack of evidence of fraud of any kind. No point in highlighting everything!

/6 ImageImageImageImage
Constantio v. Detroit

This is another good one showing that the people being accused of fraud sign affidavits too. And they are far more trustworthy than rumors and innuendo. If the accusers had just shown up to training!

/7

democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImage
Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes

"A theory for which no evidence exists"

"the real issue" was not fraud, but "the outcome of the election"

Damn.

/8
democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImageImageImage
Ward v. Jackson (Arizona)

"the challenge fails to present any evidence of misconduct [or] illegal votes”

/9
democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImageImage
I will definently add to this thread as I come across new cases. Please feel free to suggest them!

Also, I will probably do a thread that goes over the courts finding that the States did NOT break their own election laws, so let me know if you will find that useful!
I've had several commenters say the "statistical anomalies" weren't heard by judges. So I will prove that judges heard that "evidence". This is from the filing for the defense in Feehan v WEC (Wisconsin), this will be a two part tweet

10a/
courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… ImageImageImageImage
The previous tweet shows that the "experts" are no such thing, and this tweet will address the "statistical anomalies" they thought they had found. I will actually have a third tweet to put the final nail in the "statistical anomalies" coffin.

Feehan v WEC (Wisconsin)cont.

10b/ ImageImageImageImage
Third tweet proving that judges did see the "statistical anomalies" claims, and utter debunking them.

It's just a joy to read rational thought! When reading Sidney Powells claims, you forget what a blessing having
a rational brain is.

Feehan v WEC (Wisconsin)cont.
10c/ ImageImageImageImage
Just started a thread on the latest court rulings regarding States violating their own laws, or the Constitution.

The Judges are pretty clear: it did not happen.

Also going to post this here in case someone is worried about what might happen on Jan 6th

Hint: the election is over.

One last thing! Screenshot the reactions you get to this thread and I'll repost them here for the lolz.

We've had 4 years of them trolling us, let's at least get some souvenirs over the next 25 days...
Adding this thread about what the laws say WILL HAPPEN on January 6th.
My credentials are that I'm an AMERICAN! Image
The Judges are lying? Even the Trump appointed ones?

Image
It's interesting how many of the people are so desperate to throw away the Constitution.

Image
Someone didn't read the thread to see the Judge's opinions on the evidence...

Image
I literally put it in a thread for you to read! Just one click away would prove that statement true...

Image
I linked to the opinion on each one. Scroll to the bottom of the opinion to see the Judge's signature.

Image
You're telling me that the judges are lying when they say they looked at the evidence?

Image
All 60 of them were wrongly dismissed? I mean, come on, those are worse odds than Trump winning!

Image
Wait, so the evidence isn't good enough to actually go to discovery or trial?

That's not good if you want to convince America that fraud happened.

Damn. Well, I guess I stand corrected...
Didn't you just respond?

The projection is strong with this one!

Just because you are okay with your side cheating, doesn't mean other people are. Also, I didn't vote for Biden

It's almost like...

...you didn't actually read the thread that showed the judges opinions on the evidence.
I literally linked to each opinion. Just click on it and scroll to the bottom. You can see the Judge's signature yourself.

What recitation was erroneous?

I made a claim: that judges looked at the evidence

I proved it by showing what the Judges said about the evidence. This isn't rocket science

Yeah, the guy is a nutjob like the rest of the experts. He didn't even proved proof that he hacked the machines.

He also did not invent the QR code.

sos.ga.gov/index.php/elec…

ImageImage
1) The evidence not being good enough for discovery isn't going to convince anyone that fraud happend

2) Now do all the Trump appointees on the list

They are doing the biggest, most comprehensive audit in the history of the state. And when it comes back and proves you wrong, you will just move on to some other conspiracy.

And the election was an open book.


freep.com/story/news/pol…
The documents are literally from the court themselves.

It doesn't matter who hosts them!

These aren't the "smallest things" these are judges going over the evidence in detail.

No one cares what Maga's think anymore.

The delusional ravings of a madman.

Precincts record their totals digitally and physically on paper. They send it to the County who store the totals digitally and physically. They send it to the State who stores the totals digitally and physically.

I don't need the existence of gravity investigated to know it exists.

Some things are obvious lies and distortions. This is one of those things. Some of the allegations were concerning, this one is not.
Well this was a new excuse for people not to look at the evidence! Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jonathan Casey

Jonathan Casey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonathanTCasey

Jonathan Casey Profile picture
Feb 20
Josh is right that the Libertarian Party need a major shift, I don't agree with everything here, but appreciate him raising some tough points.

He also has an actual vision, compared to the Mises Caucus who thought that all that was needed was to be in charge.

🧵🧵🧵
Preface: I completely agree that the LP needs top to bottom bylaws changes and a total overhaul of its structure. I'll leave a lot of the discussion on what those changes should be for another day.

2/
The Mises Caucus will likely try and stop any needed changes, simply because they wrongly think the issue is leadership, and not structural.

Thankfully their support has been crumbling quickly, as people realize they never had much of a plan.

3/
Read 16 tweets
Jonathan Casey Profile picture
Feb 8, 2023
Yesterday, the Libertarian Party released a statement regarding the “Rage Against the War Machine” rally.

The time to talk has passed. This is the time for action.

lp.org/statement-from…

/1
The statement had a principled anti-war message regarding the Russian invasion and properly condemned it.

I am grateful for this, but it comes far too late and the rest of the statement fails to solve the problem at hand.

/2
The statement tells Scott Ritter, a convicted pedophile, that the Libertarian Party “prefers” he just stays home.

Let’s be clear: The Libertarian Party has full control of the stage.

/3
Read 14 tweets
Jonathan Casey Profile picture
Feb 5, 2023
.@angela4LNCChair, the anti-war movement isn't such a lost cause that we have to partner with pro-war agitators.

Take a principled stand, let's break away and unite the Libertarian Party behind a true anti-war rally!

That drama would make for fantastic press for the LP!

/1 🧵
Instead of the LP being associated with the pro-Putin crowd, the headlines would be "LP breaks away from Kremlin rally, organizes their own anti-war rally"

That would get attention and be an absolute W for the LP!

/2
Screw the pro-war crowd and their funding.

The LP can unite and put on our own rally that is truly anti-war.

So let's do it!

There is an opportunity here to make something out of this, the only.question is, are you willing to stand up for our principles?

/3
Read 5 tweets
Jonathan Casey Profile picture
Nov 15, 2022
Some quick thoughts on what the Libertarian Party (or any organization) should do when communication failures happen.

Because they will happen regardless of how careful anyone is.

🧵🧵🧵🧵
1/
I do think (and certainly hope) that the racist imagery in the now-deleted meme was unintentional, but that doesn't excuse the failure to take timely corrective action.

2/
Though it is not the most concerning point of failure, there should be questions about how the meme was obtained and vetted.

Protecting the Libertarian Party brand from harmful and hateful associations should be a top priority of the communications staff.

3/
Read 9 tweets
Jonathan Casey Profile picture
Jan 12, 2021
This is huge if true.
To meet earlier than the 19th would require a unanimous vote by the Senate, which just isn't going to happen.

This also could be a strategic leak to test out the waters and the reaction to the news

The Dominoes are falling...
Read 12 tweets
Jonathan Casey Profile picture
Jan 10, 2021
How it started....how it's going ImageImage
How it started..... How it's going ImageImage
How it started... How it's going ImageImage
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(