Seen lots of #“buidl” comments from the #xrpcommmunity. Now, more than ever, you should support changes like Richard Holland’s Hooks for the #XRPL . Let me explain why. hhttps://dev.to/wietse/hooked-1-smart-contracts-on-the-xrp-ledger-5eb6
1/n
I’ve worked with Richard for several years trying to build on the XRPL. It’s cheap, fast, secure and has the potential to mint tokens. So, why not use it, right? For example, we worked on a self-KYC identity solution called iXRPL. 2/n
It stamps your XRP account with a token from an identity provider that confirms you have KYC’d yourself and allows you to grant single-use access to the underlying data for exchanges seeking to confirm your identity. 3/n
It protects against fraud (e.g. deal only with stamped accounts) and solves the proposed FinCEN rule of KYC’ing private wallets. Everything is encrypted and decentralised and runs on unique consensus protocol Richard developed called HotPocket. We will showcase it soon. 4/n
But for other uses, we kept running into a problem: tokens on the xrpl are controlled by keys, not code. You can split the keys, but you always end up with someone controlling the secrets and those secrets have to be held somewhere. 5/n
This meant XRPL tokens always had a counterparty. And after the SEC action against Ripple everyone can see how important it might be for an asset to have no perceived counterparty. 6/n
It also means there is always a custodian and a honeypot. This is a problem for various reasons, mostly to do with legal liability under various guises, be it Money Services Business, Securities or just consumer law and tort obligations as a holder of someone else’s value. 7/n
This differs from Ethereum where the token can be controlled by the protocol. Contracts have their own address, instead of interacting with accounts. You can throw away the keys and everything still works. 8/n
Richard conceived of Hooks as a way around this problem for the xrpl. Essentially, tokens can be controlled by very small amounts of code, rather than keys. So tokens created on the xrpl can effectively held by the xrpl, rather than any set of individuals. 9/n
The Hooks can then interact with other protocols and “second layers”, allowing more elaborate and sophisticated smart contract platforms to interact with the xrpl to direct how tokens are held/transferred/escrowed etc. Hooks are truly powerful. 10/n
With Richard, I am working on a specialised dapp/smart contract layer able to interact with Hooks on the XRPL (and all other chains). This would bring trustless and powerful smart contracts to the XRPL, including XRP collateralised stablecoins and other forms of defi. 11/n
More soon… follow along if you’re excited for updates early in the New Year. 12/end
Link in first tweet didn't work... learn about Hooks here... dev.to/wietse/hooked-…
1/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Chamberlain

Scott Chamberlain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scotty2ten

23 Dec
Read the SEC Complaint against Ripple. It’s bad for XRP and for all crypto, except BTC. It’s bad for XRP because it alleges all XRP are *at this very moment* securities in the US, not just the XRP Ripple allegedly bundled into an investment contract. 1/n
Ironically, that would mean XRP can’t be used by anyone for any purpose *other than* speculation on Ripple’s success in the US. Go figure. The XRPL is a fully functioning network. I’ve used it to send value between exchanges to cash out in AUD through an ODL exchange partner. 2/n
It takes all of 30 seconds for the money to arrive in my bank account. It is a wondrous experience. At no time did I think I was purchasing a speculative investment product. Yet the SEC alleges that is exactly what I did. 3/n
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!