Tweet

Rich Glick

28 Dec, 4 tweets, 2 min read

@FERC

Included in tonight’s just signed omnibus bill is an important provision requiring @FERC to submit to Congress a plan to finally establish the Office of Public Participation. I’m happy to see this new Office take a step forward! 1/4

@FERC

The Office will provide a much-needed addition to @FERC—one that ensures that consumers, landowners, & others that can’t afford expensive legal representation can participate effectively in complex #FERC proceedings that have significant impacts on their lives. 2/4

@FERC

This new Office will also improve @FERC decisionmaking by providing a voice for environmental justice communities that have too often been overlooked. 3/4

@FERC

I look forward to working with my @FERC colleagues to ensure that this new Office meets Congress’ objectives. 4/4

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @RichGlickFERC

Rich Glick

@RichGlickFERC

20 Dec 19

@FERC

@FERC @pjminterconnect .@FERC’s PJM MOPR is a direct attack on state electric generation resource decisionmaking. The Federal Power Act is clear, FERC does not have this authority. FERC has the responsibility to attempt to accommodate state decisions not overturn them.

@FERC

@FERC @pjminterconnect .@FERC’s PJM MOPR is a bailout--costing consumers BILLIONS of dollars every year. Conservatively, $2.4B+ associated w/ higher capacity payments, rising over time per year, & doesn’t even include the costs consumers will pay when states continue to pursue their policy preferences.

@FERC

@FERC @pjminterconnect The costs imposed by @FERC’s PJM MOPR & the ubiquitous preferences given to existing resources are a transparent attempt to handicap those state actions & slow – or maybe even stop – the clean energy transition.

Read 5 tweets

Rich Glick

@RichGlickFERC

10 Mar 18

@FERC

I write tonight to express strong reservations about @FERC’s approach to MOPR and state policies. #FERC is approving #CASPR, for all of the wrong reasons! Follow me below into the #TweetStorm

I disagree strongly with the order’s suggestion that state sponsored resources must either be subject to a Minimum Offer Price Rule (#MOPR) or some alternative mechanism for “accommodating” the effects of state public policies.

That rationale—which is not adopted by a majority of the Commissioners that support the order—is ill-conceived, misguided, and a serious threat to consumers, the environment and, in fact, the long-term viability of the Commission’s capacity market construct.

Read 16 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Share this page!

Rich Glick

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @RichGlickFERC

Rich Glick

Rich Glick

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Like this author's thread?