Chateaubriand's Memoires d'Outre-tombe are extraordinary both because of the spread of events (from before 1789 to 1840s) and places (Europe, Middle East, USA) they cover and the quality of observations.
I loved this sentence that does not apply to France only.
"En France, l’oubli ne se fait pas attendre."
Or, a very early formulation of the question that Orban is asking today:
Recevrons nous le chatiment merité d’avoir appris l’art moderne des armes à des peuples dont l’état social est fondé sur l’esclavage et la polygamie? Avons-nous porté la civilisation au dehors, ou avons-nous amené la barbarie dans l’interieur de la chretienté?
"Shall we be deservedly punished for having taught the modern art of weaponry to the peoples whose society is based on slavery and polygamy? Had we carried civilization outside or brought barbarism within Christendom?"
But he is not always "politically incorrect" (in today's terms) or insensitive.
Car ces puissances civilisées, republiques et monarchies, se partagent sans façon en Amerique des terres que leur n’appartiennent pas
"Yet these civilized powers, whether republics or monarchies, divide among themselves, without much scruple, the lands in America which do not belong to them."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For entertaining and enlightenment, here are some of my debates in 2020.
Is middle class stagnation a myth (with Donald Boudreaux) pairagraph.com/dialogue/320a8…
Reflections & predictions.
After spending a year in North America in 1790-91, and after traveling a lot and meeting people (incl. George Washington), Chateaubriand wrote, probably in 1820s, this assessment of the USA.
The North & the South have different interests. Western states are far from the rest. Can unity of the country be safeguarded? Will it be done by war?
Can the US maintain its hegemony in the Western hemisphere as new independent republics are created in Mexico and further South?
Will long peace that helped US develop sap the ability of the population to face emergencies?
Mercantile spirit is everywhere: "l'interet [commercial] devient le vice national."
A chrysogene (neologism from Greek for wealth) aristocracy is being born.
Here is (for whoever may be interested) the list of books on China that I have read in the past 5-6 years;
in no particular order, with my assessments: 5 stars is the best, 2 the worst.
Books I reviewed on my blog are noted with ++.
John Palmer, The death of Mao, Faber & Faber, 2012 **
Jonathan Fenby, Will China dominate the 21st century, Polity, 2014 ***
Quan Yanchi, Mao: Man, not God ***
Jacques Gernet, Daily life in China on the Eve of Mongol Invasion 1250-76, Stanford UP, 1962. ****
++Giovanni Arrighi, Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the 21st Century, Verso, 2007. *****
Minxin Pei, China’s crony capitalism, Harvard UP, 2016. ****
Minxin Pei, China’s Trapped Transition, Harvard UP, 2006. ***
There is a sort of "declinism" literature that appears 20 years. In the 1980s, it is "the missile gap" w/ the USSR and "The Grand Strategy of the Soviet Union" by the eminent historian Edward Luttwak. amazon.com/Grand-Strategy…
When that grand strategy somehow did not materialize & the USSR collapsed, the threat (and books) were forgotten.
There was also, starting in the 1970s, the Japanese threat whereby Japan will buy the entire America.
When Japan went into two decades of no growth that threat too was forgotten.
The most recent variant is the "China threat". China is indeed increasing in importance but is just going back, in relative economic power, to where it was in 1500.
Nirad Chadhury, Thy Hand, Great Anarch: India 1921-1952.
"Ever since I have become capable of thinking I have despised public opinion. I have realized that it follows events & cannot influence them, & besides shifts with a blind fickleness which is terrifying to watch." (p.69)
..One must say that the economic theories of political violence and terrorism are total nonsense. I would set down most emphatically that nowhere in the world has terrorism been, or is, a product of economic distress. It springs solely from racial or class hatred." (p.314).
[On British report on India]
"It was as if the wolf, when presenting his argument to the lamb for eating it was assuming that he was speaking only to a fellow-wolf & at the same time taking it for granted that if the lamb was not persuaded it must be a very unreasonable animal."