February 2020, Wapo- “How to prepare for coronavirus in the U.S. (Spoiler: Not sick? No need to buy any masks.)” (you may need to scroll the thread to see tweet)
February 2020, CNN “There's been a run of surgical masks in the US because of the coronavirus scare. You don't need them, physicians say.” cnn.com/2020/01/28/hea…
CNN again “Masks can't stop the coronavirus in the US, but hysteria has led to bulk-buying and price-gouging” edition.cnn.com/asia/live-news…
MSNBC: “Frequent hand-washing, not wearing a face mask, is the most important step the public can take to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, the WHO says.”
March- Masks can be hurtful! CNN: “Masks may actually increase your coronavirus risk if worn improperly, surgeon general warns.” cnn.com/2020/03/02/hea…
WaPo- Epidemiology experts said the most important aspect of preparedness costs nothing at all — calm. (you may need to scroll the thread to see tweet)
WaPo - If you’re not already sick and you’re not a health-care worker, you don’t need to wear a mask. And you certainly don’t need to buy every box your local pharmacy has in stock. (you may need to scroll the thread to see tweet)
End of March- NBC News criticizes the President for being fixated on masks and arguing with experts who said not to wear them… nbcnews.com/politics/white…
ABC News tweeted, “There is little benefit to wearing a surgical type mask, and may even put you at greater risk for spreading infection, infectious disease doctors told ABC News.”
June & July 2020, Dr. Fauci himself admitted that the public was intentionally misled for months because of a concern of limited resources supplies for medical professionals. npr.org/sections/healt…; businessinsider.com/fauci-mask-adv…
The moral of the story is stop holding these people up as heroes, be skeptical, do your own research, and cut people slack for “not following experts” who consistently and intentionally misled them.
The science didn't change. The politics did.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
First, is board diversity an issue. Yes. Boards in general are packed with cronies and people not willing to "go against the crowd".
Diversity is a good and important factor for corporate governance and otherwise, but quotas make me uncomfortable...
Diversity is valuable because it ensures a variety of perspectives, experiences, networks & thought processes are included in the company’s management or governance. This gives companies a richer pool of information to draw from and more thoughtful customer & stakeholder outcomes
Hey, @BridgetPhetasy, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but...
By the way, in Tom Arnold’s fantasy civil war, which side do you think has the advantage? The guy who is going to “borrow his dad’s hunting rifle” or the ones who have a bunch and know how to use them? Dude, seriously.
Let me run through this shoddy “CARES Act” math & strategy again (which should be called Congress really doesn't care about small biz)...
Small biz is HALF the economy- half the revenues, half the employees- in more than 30 million entities...
Despite being forced to shut down in many cases, they received less than 20% of the “CARES” stimulus, which required a free-for-all at banks (which, not surprisingly, seem to have prioritized larger small biz customers w existing relationships)...
...leaving most small biz, particularly the smaller & more vulnerable, out in the cold, all while universities, including those w big endowments, got billions & govt cronies like the Kennedy Center millions without having to do squat.
It is not immoral for anyone to have a lot of wealth that was created legally.
It is highly immoral for any individual or govt to decide they should confiscate that wealth to use it to fund their own preferred projects, items, desires...
Wealthy people don't swim in a big coin room like Scrooge McDuck.
That money is used to buy things which supports jobs/economy, to invest, which supports jobs/economy & for charity.
As the pie is not fixed in the US, the wealth was created & is not at someone else's expense.
The govt takes in more than $3 trillion at the federal level- that's more than enough $. Spending is the problem.
And if you didn't have people creating wealth and expanding the pie, there wouldn't be the ability to even spend at that level w/o more debt.
The American Dream is not dead. Not even close. What is dead-or at least dying- is people realizing that to achieve the American Dream, they have to make sacrifices, tough choices & prioritize as they don’t get every thing at once or just for living under the red, white & blue.
I can take just about anyone of prime working age, with the exceptions of those w true disabilities, and have them making six figures and living in a big house. However, you may not get to do what you want to do. You might have to do hard labor or work some overtime...
You may have to move from NYC to Indiana.
That’s the deal. It used to be understood you could have a nice home or a car or take great trips. But you have to put in the work and delay other consumer gratification. You might not everything at once—you pick what is important.
A few words on platform-shaming.
I've been fortunate to share my thoughts on a slew of things on various platforms, but I often get pushback resembling, “I like you, but I don’t like where you are posting” as a reason not to engage or to invalidate my ideas. I find this bizarre.
If you like what I am saying, wouldn’t you want me to bring it to a wide audience, including an audience who may not get to hear that message very often?
How do people learn different perspectives if messengers are blocked from talking to them?
The same goes with accounts I follow and engage with. There are people I have been criticized for following, sharing and/or liking content. People are not one-dimensional characters. We are complex.