Well, folks, I'm officially the latest online personality to start a Substack, and the question that might be on your mind is: “Does the universe really need this?”

I seriously doubt it, but let me explain why I’m doing it. (thread)
I’ve always wanted to write for a living. Like actual personal writing and commentary, basically what I do on Twitter every day for free. Up until now, I’ve been paid to do communications work—of which I’m proud—but that’s not even close to being the same thing.
In the past, despite a number of offers, I’ve always declined to monetize my Twitter account because there’s a chance of risking a loss of trust with folks who follow your work. I really admire the people who have made that work, but I didn’t wanna risk it.
Instead, I've used my Twitter solely for fundraising. This year, alone, y'all have helped me raise something close to half a million dollars for candidates and causes that are important to us. Pretty damn cool. I'm proud of all we've done together.
When I left the Human Rights Campaign earlier this year to embark on a personal writing career, I had some small consulting work and a few paid speaking engagements lined up that I thought would give me a decent head start in figuring out how to make that dream a reality.
But then the pandemic hit and most of that work got wiped out overnight, and I’ve been dragging my ass on the book proposal (although it is still very much coming). I consider myself lucky in that I was still able to support myself, but not by much.
My goal with this Substack is simple: I want to have full freedom to write about whatever I want and eventually make a living income in doing so. That’s not gonna happen overnight. It’ll take time. But I owe it to myself to try.
Subscriptions to my Substack are totally free. Anyone who signs up will have access to 99% of my posts. Paid subscriptions will be totally opt-in, and I’ll recognize them for what they are: a simple message from someone that they like what I’ve written and to keep going.
They’re also pretty cheap. Just $7/month. A monthly cup of coffee (well, really good coffee) for a writer you enjoy. There’s also a neat discount for a yearly subscription ($70).
And if you’re feeling really generous, you can become a Founding Member and donate way more than $70 (Substack recommended $210, so I went with it as the default, but you can donate less than that. Or more!).
Of course, all these rates are fairly moot. Because again: access is free. The only things you get from a paid subscription are 1) the ability to comment on posts, 2) some private posts available to only paid subscribers, and 3) the knowledge you’re directly supporting me.
I kinda look at this project as a glorified tip jar. If you like what you see from me on Twitter, you’re getting all that in this format, except with the ability to throw some change my way if you feel so moved.
If you love my threads or my humor or my silly musings on a wide range of subjects, I think you’ll love what you see on my Substack. And who knows? Maybe this will lead to the ability to just write whatever I want for a living someday. That'd be pretty cool.
In any case, I appreciate the consideration, and I certainly hope you’ll subscribe: charlotteclymer.substack.com/subscribe

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charlotte Clymer 🏳️‍🌈

Charlotte Clymer 🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cmclymer

31 Dec 20
I wrote a lot of pieces in 2020! As we close out the year, I want to share a short list of my favorites. (thread)
In March, while we all watched in horror as the Trump administration botched the initial response to the pandemic, I wrote for @Independent about the bizarre and unjust access many healthy celebrities gained to COVID tests, which were quite scarce. independent.co.uk/voices/coronav…
In April, when it was apparent Joe Biden was on his way to winning the nomination, I wrote for @washingtonpost on why progressives should have optimism about a Biden White House. washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/0…
Read 10 tweets
23 Dec 20
I watched an advance screener of "Promising Young Woman" today, starring Carey Mulligan as Cassie Thomas, a med school dropout who exacts revenge against rapists and sexual assailants, and it's one hell of a film. Here are many thoughts on it. (thread)
Right off the bat, I should say that the film graphically references, describes, and depicts rapes and sexual assaults and also suicide. In case the trailer hadn't been direct enough about that, consider this a trigger warning. It is DEEPLY uncomfortable to watch in some parts.
The film opens up with three younger guys at a happy hour engaged in, uh, "locker room talk". Well, two of the three. The third is the apparent moral center of the scene, played perfectly by Adam Brody. He's the Nice Guy. He chides the other two.
Read 25 tweets
22 Dec 20
Today is the 10th anniversary of the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", the policy that barred openly lesbian, gay, and bisexual people from serving in the military. My service in the Army coincided with the last six years of DADT. We are now living in DADT 2.0 for trans people.
Before Trump's trans ban went into effect, the U.S. military was the largest employer of transgender people in the world. For three years, trans people served openly, a period described by the generals and admirals overseeing our military as free of complications.
Republicans now use the same fear-mongering over trans people that they did with lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the military back then:

1. Threats to military readiness and unit cohesion.
2. Medically unfit.
3. Moral panic.
Read 10 tweets
22 Dec 20
Call it unfortunate timing all you want, but the fact that this cheating scandal at West Point--the worst in more than four decades--comes during the Trump administration is hard to ignore. This is a "Commander in Chief" who sets a horrible example. Leadership matters.
Let me quickly contextualize this for folks who may not be aware. West Point's Honor Code isn't a performative thing in the way that mission statements, values statements, etc. are so often performative at organizations. The Academy takes this very, very seriously. (1/3)
To give you one example: any time a cadet submits a paper for class, they're required to put a carefully formatted cover sheet on top with their signature attesting that the paper is consistent with the Honor Code. Every. Single. Paper. (2/3)
Read 4 tweets
19 Dec 20
Listen... I love The Bee Gees and I know it’s currently “cool” to say The Beatles are overrated, but let’s not drive off the cliff here.
Like, yeah, The Bee Gees have been unfairly maligned for a LONG time and there's bound to be overcorrection because they're lovely, but holy shit, there's just no comparison to what The Beatles did. I can't even be charitable on this one.
The Beatles could be credited with transforming the direction of popular music not just once but TWICE and in less than six years. That's mind-boggling.
Read 5 tweets
18 Dec 20
Did y'all know that many Members of Congress live out of their offices when they're here in D.C., away from their districts? It's true! Mostly Republicans, they say that the cost-of-living is too expensive for a cheap apartment here in D.C. (thread)
This is totally real. It's actually an ongoing debate within Congress on whether representatives should be permitted to live out of their offices. Some say it violates ethics rules, some say it's unsafe during COVID. But they do live there!
Now, I don't know the exact total--I don't think anyone does--but some reports have said up to 100 House members live out of their offices. That's about 23% of the House. Let's say it's 60 Republicans -- that would be almost a third of the current GOP House Caucus.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!