within 12 years, Scotland plans to create around 10 Glasgows-worth of new 'woodland', primarily through tree planting.

what if i told you that this could not only be done, but done better, *without* planting a single tree?

thread:
firstly, trees have managed to successfully plant themselves for at least 385 million years. they're actually really good at it! if they weren't, they'd not have made it back to Scotland after the last ice age.

we call trees planting themselves 'natural regeneration'
natural regeneration is the reason most ancient woods in the Highlands exist - they're made up of *wild trees*, descendants of those that recolonised Scotland after the ice age.

wild trees are generally more variable than planted ones (both genetically and in form):
the reason we don't see wild trees spreading back out across the landscape is that natural regen is now widely prevented by high numbers of deer (and in some places livestock), who eat all the little tree seedings. you can see the impact either side of this effective deer fence
another consequence of this is that ancient woods are slowly falling apart, as trees that die are not being replaced. undergrowth and wildflowers are also widely suppressed, with big knock on impacts on pollinators and other wildlife
to address this, we ultimately need to reduce unbalanced deer populations. it is not normal for deer to be eating *every* accessible seedling across much of the Highlands - this happens because:
a) we've removed their predators, and
b) most estates aim to keep deer numbers high
when deer (and livestock where applicable) are in balance with natural regeneration, ancient woods will start to recover and expand on their own - if all woodland on Scotland's Ancient Woodland Inventory expanded outwards by 100m, we'd increase tree cover by ~25 Glasgows-worth
this approach has major ecological advantages over our current tree planting plans. arguably the biggest is that it puts trees and shrubs where they're of most use to wildlife - inside and around ancient woods. it also allows undergrowth and wildflowers to spread (pics)
another is that natural regeneration creates new wild trees, preserving genetic diversity (key to providing resilience to disease and climate change) and generating expanded woodland with a natural composition and structure (important for wildlife). planting doesn't do this well
yet another is that natural regeneration can include a flowery, berry-rich scrub stage that precedes canopy tree establishment - and this scrub stage is fantastic for wildlife
finally, tree planting often involves soil disturbance (severe if plowing or mechanically mounding, pictured), which can release a significant amount of carbon (Scotland's soils store *a lot* of carbon)

woodland expansion through natural regeneration avoids this
when you next hear about tree planting targets (probs in run up to May 2021 Scottish parliament elections), pls question them. we're going down a very expensive route that allows ancient woods & wild trees to be sacrificed, and is not delivering much for wildlife @FergusEwingMSP

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with collbradán

collbradán Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @collbradan

18 Oct 20
1) for the last 60 years, we've been funding a campaign to exterminate Europe's wildlife. through the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), hundreds of billions of euros of public money have been funnelled into destroying wildlife-rich meadows, woods, wetlands and rivers
2) while the precise formula has varied over the years, CAP essentially requires farmers to wreck nature in order to receive larger subsidies. agricultural intensification - responsible for so much pollution and wildlife loss - is one of CAP's core aims
3) CAP also favours larger farms over small ones, which twinned with intensification has driven down the number of people actually working the land.
in 1973 Ireland had around 263000 farm workers versus only ~85000 today (iiea.com/wp-content/upl…)
Read 9 tweets
14 Jun 20
in 2010 this was a lawn
since then, its been allowed to grow all spring and summer, followed by cutting and removing clippings in autumn/winter

*we didn't resow* - most of the plants you can see spread naturally when released from frequent mowing
if we had resown, we'd have unwittingly wiped out our (then unknown) population of adder's tongue fern - a rare plant of old grasslands

(centre of the pic, doesn't look much like a fern at all!)
Read 5 tweets
5 Jun 20
large herbivores, trees and flowers: an Irish and Scottish perspective 🐂🌳🌼(thread, a bit detailed).

outside of cities, our surroundings are massively shaped by the actions of large herbivores - cattle, horses, sheep and deer - alongside our efforts to manage or exploit them
in the lowlands, our efforts to exploit cattle primarily determines how the landscape looks (intensively managed grass fields), except in surviving woods, wetlands and meadows.

in the uplands the actions of the herbivores themselves are more important (the focus of this thread)
large herbivores mainly influence vegetation by feeding. when they eat trees and other woody plants we call this browsing, and when they eat grasses, wildflowers and other non-woody plants we call this grazing.
the rate of browsing/grazing is how much they eat over time
Read 16 tweets
7 Feb 20
western Ireland and Britain are among a handful of places on Earth where temperate rainforest can form. this thread is a mini guide to some of the things you can find there:
1) trees drenched in mosses and ferns. hyperhumid conditions mean that plants don't need to rely on soil for moisture, releasing them to carpet leaning tree trunks and snakey branches
2) lichens- lots and lots of lichens, a few of which are found nowhere else in the world. some of the big leafy ones turn nitrogen from the air into fertiliser for their host trees
Read 9 tweets
17 Sep 19
enough is enough: Ireland is NOT planting trees to combat climate change @HuffPost. 70% of trees planted will be non-native commercial conifers destined for clearfell. they threaten wildlife and will not reduce atmospheric carbon in the long run (thread)

huffpost.com/entry/ireland-…
Sitka spruce from the pacific NW is the main forestry tree in Ireland. it is densely planted and usually harvested after 40 years. i've done some carbon calculations to test lobbyist claims that new spruce plantations will act as carbon sinks...
...Sitka spruce are planted on marginal agricultural land, which often means species rich meadows. these can be home to rare and declining species, like the marsh fritillary butterfly. these meadows store a lot of carbon in their soils...
Read 10 tweets
27 Aug 19
in Ireland, the extinction crisis is green:

1) green fields are sterile and simple. each was created through the destruction of a complex wood, bog or meadow that came before. their simplicity is maintained with herbicide and by overloading the soil with nitrates and phosphates
2) they exist for animal agriculture, mainly dairy and beef. the idea is to maximise grass production, which in turn maximises milk or beef production. this model has been pushed for decades, and now most of our countryside looks like this:
3) the nitrates and phosphates that are applied (either as slurry or artificial fertilisers) to green fields seep into groundwater and wash into rivers. this pollution has driven precipitous declines in freshwater life and wetland health
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!