1. Here's a New Year's Resolution: More tolerance toward political opponents🥳

Dems and Reps tend to caricature one another (see example below from perceptiongap.us)

Our opponents really are not as extreme, homogeneous, or morally inferior as people tend to think.
2. These caricatures or 'perception gaps' are lowest among more moderate people and increase as people are more politically extreme. Which suggests that people who have more accurate views of the political landscape tend not to be extremists.
3. Most media consumption is associated with worse perception gaps. The exceptions being some good old fashioned ABC, NBC, & CBS.
4. Education has no relationship with perception gaps for Republicans. For Democrats, education *increases* perception gaps.
5. Why does education make Democrats more wrong about their political opponents? Perhaps because more educated Democrats live in more politically homogeneous bubbles. (@PsychRabble, thought you'd like this one).
6. People who share political content on social media have larger perception gaps. So probably the political content we see on social media comes form a nonrandom sample of people with more political hostility toward their opponents.
7. If living in politically homogeneous bubbles makes us more wrong about the views of our political opponents, one way to tune your own political goggles: more friendships and sincere conversations with people who do not share your political views.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cory Clark

Cory Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ImHardcory

21 Dec 20
1. The paper 'The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance' has been retracted by the authors, despite that the authors still believe the key findings are valid. Image
2. This is the paper that found that a higher proportion of female mentors was associated with fewer post-mentorship citations (or lower impact) for female protégés. Image
3. The scientific complaints involved their operationalizations of 'mentorship' and 'performance/success'.

Why not just retitle the paper 'The association between early career collaborations and junior author citations'? Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!