Let's be honest, though. If we're doing this, then they become units/classes about post-colonial theory, feminism, or psychoanalysis--not literature--which is fine but let's at least be honest about it.
It's an approach to literature that affirms one worldview
It's an approach to literature that affirms one worldview
https://twitter.com/mattcarton/status/1344401331780349953
I could teach my students a Calvinist Christian "lens" but I doubt many would be happy about it. Read character motivations, themes, and author's contentions against my faith through the idea of "total human depravity" but then I'm just self-affirming my beliefs.
@MsJasmineMN was right. I should have not used "no intellectual challenge." It's a poor use of words on my part. There's intellectual challenge reading as such but not ideological contention.
I could read an atheist narrative and still affirm my own theology.
I could read an atheist narrative and still affirm my own theology.
Also, let it be known, I’m not a Calvinist. Free will for the win
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
