To more inclusive & interesting conversations in 2021 🥂
Here are 54 women I follow on @twitter and learn from everyday. I follow both men and women, and I learn from both. Please RT if you do too, and amplify their voices.
Smart journalists @KaraSwisher: whip smart and fun @TaylorLorentz: I read Taylor long before she became internet famous bc I loved her early spotting pieces on tech & culture @polina_marinova: Polina‘s profiles are a joy @Nmasc_: Natasha’s substack is lyrical and a pleasure
@women20 & @januaryventures: if you want to diversify your dealflow, both funds hold events to amplify the pitches of women founders
Hiring? @TechLadyAllison: runs a group of 100K women engineers
Even more resources (+ some of my favorite folks) @jessicapeltz & @SutianDong run an under-the-radar, but enormous, global Slack group of women investors and fund managers @PamKostka and @AllRaise are providing important resources to women founders & funders.
This was from a quick scan of my timeline - who did I miss?
A shoutout to all the brilliant women out there & hoping they’ll all get many new followers in 2021🔥
Folks: In my quick copy and pasting from my phone, I made some errors. Pls excuse me!
Applying software to highly regulated / intermediated industries like education and healthcare is so tricky.
When well-meaning technologists dive into these industries they slam into quite a few things. Human systems prove harder to hack.
A thread:
⚠️ 1st problem: more than usual inertia around the status quo.
There are often multiple stakeholders who have fought to build distinct moats or for whom the status quo simply is profitable, and it distorts economic, productivity, and outcomes-based incentives.
⚠️ 2nd problem: disconnect between users, stakeholders and payers.
Where normally, design principles teach us to find a deep stakeholder problem and solve it, here you can do that and still not find a payer for it (ever).
Sometimes it takes a few startups, raising several rounds of venture funding, and going through an acquisition process — before founders understand some of the *unwritten dynamics in venture capital.*
#1: Raising more money does not automatically translate into building a more valuable startup.
Y’all will debate me fiercely on this one, but historically, this is true. Please see @epaley’s definitive analysis on this here. techcrunch.com/2016/10/15/ove…
#2: Growing into a high valuation is highly binary.
Like accelerating into a curve and hoping you make it... t he key proof point will be at your next round of funding, not this one.