It's important not to allow the fact that high-level officials and media personalities have promoted these claims of election fraud to obscure just how utterly baseless (unsupported by serious evidence, easily refuted, or downright impossible) they have uniformly proven to be.
It's very easy to lazily conclude that because there are so many claims, and because prominent people have repeated them, that there must be SOMETHING to this. But there isn't anything to it. It's all just obviously fabricated nonsense.
A large volume of fabricated nonsense is still fabricated nonsense.
We should - absolutely - improve the security of US election infrastructure. But not to eliminate "foreign servers in Germany that tally the votes". Because those don't exist. That's just made up.
This is about way more than the 2020 election outcome. This is about whether losers of US elections should accept the outcome of ANY process, no matter how rigorous.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The thing that gets most deeply stuck in my craw here is how the thousands of dedicated election workers who worked tirelessly to give us an amazingly smooth election at significant personal risk are not only being denied the thanks and recognition they deserve, but vilified.
To get a sense of what an accomplishment this election was, consider this short writeup from March on pandemic voting: mattblaze.org/papers/Emergen… . Almost all of the challenges came to pass (and more) and almost none of the suggested federal support materialized.
Essentially, most counties had to run TWO elections simulaneously - one in person, and one by mail, with no way to be sure in advance of how many voters would use which. And local election workers somehow did it. Really well. We own them a huge dept.
This would be a great move for Indian science. Though part of me understands scientific journal subscription fees the same way I understand paying ransomware.
For those not in science: authors and their institutions aren’t paid for their papers (sometimes it’s even the other way around). The journals don’t support the research in any way, but they insist on copyright transfer. Subscription fees are just pointless rent-seeking.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to see a nice (if largely cosmetic) improvement, but until they add urgently needed capacity to the tunnels, rail travel into NYC is still going to be a mess.
That said, after 9 months of this pandemic, I'd practically kiss the ground of even the old Penn Station if I could travel again.
There are genuine weaknesses in some of the voting tech used in the US, which is why experts advocate for things like risk-limiting audits. But this is not by itself proof that any election was "rigged", an extraordinary claim that requires specific, persuasive evidence.
I am not aware ANY credible evidence of technical flaws being exploited to alter the outcome of any race in the 2020 elections for any candidate, regardless of party. Beware of self-promoting charlatans (across the political spectrum) making alarming claims without evidence.
Trump and his supporters are getting a lot of attention (and have been doing a lot of damage) with claims like this, but they are by no means the only people trying to use the mere existence of vulnerabilities to cast doubt on election outcomes they don't like.