@CMO_England Regulatory "checks and balances".
House of Commons Health Committee:
"The Secretary of State for Health
cannot serve two masters. The Department seems unable to prioritise the interests of
patients and public health...
... over the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. We therefore
recommend that sponsorship of the industry¹ pass from the Department of Health to the
Department of Trade and Industry."
¹ Now known as “responsibility for representing the interests of the industry".
This is why our 'government' were confident enough to purchase millions of doses of unapproved vaccines with tax payer money, well in advance of even the first trials being published...you always knew
they'd be approved, as the MHRA have and always will be beholden to the pharmaceutical industry.
Admit it: The health of the nation is a secondary concern, if it is indeed a concern at all.
People: Get vaccinated, don't get vaccinated. Just don't make your decisions based on
blind faith that the system is rigorous and there to protect you, it's barely anything more than a Trade body.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@NHSEngland@OUHospitals@OxfordVacGroup@AstraZeneca Are you informing people that they have a very real risk of worse disease or death when they have the vaccine and are then exposed to the live virus before administration through ADE, or are you conveniently skipping over that info?
@NHSEngland@OUHospitals@OxfordVacGroup@AstraZeneca If clinical trial participants weren't generally being told about the possibility of increased risk of more severe disease post-vaccination, then is informed consent likely to be disastrously overlooked when delivering the vaccine rapidly to the populace?...
@NHSEngland@OUHospitals@OxfordVacGroup@AstraZeneca As far as I can determine through looking at the studies, a 'challenge' (introduction of the wild virus to trial participants to see if the vaccines were indeed effective) test was not used.
Inform yourself, because they won't inform you....