With the polio vaccine, the high-priority group was children. It began with 7 and 8 year olds in late spring 1955.
Polio was seasonal, peaking in summer, and when vaccination began in spring 1955 there was uncertainty about whether it would be safe to keep putting it in kids' arms during the peak summer months. By June, the expert consensus was that the benefits outweighed the risks.
Less than two weeks into the effort, with demand far exceeding supply, NYC's health commissioner asked for the federal government to take over distribution and complained of "continuously confusing" messages about how it was to be delivered
In October 1955, a goal was set to vaccinate all American children ages 1 to 9 in 1956. It was thought that there would be enough supply by then.
But by April 1956, with summer looming and demand surging, there were again shortages. The New York Times asked, "Why, after a year of commercial production, is the vaccine still in short supply?"
This graph shows monthly vaccine output during the first year
Chicago had a severe outbreak in July 1956, reported here on the front page of the Black-owned Defender: "All victims of the city's current polio outbreak are in the low income group and 55 percent of them are Negroes."
In early August, a week before the Democratic National Convention was to meet in Chicago, the federal government "advised adults who are planning to go to Chicago to take polio vaccinations if Salk vaccine is available where they live"
The city reported in late August that polio cases were focused in 4 areas on the city's West Side that were home to "Negro and white migrants" from the South
By 1960, polio very disproportionately sickened low-income Black children. The CDC reported that spring that "Negroes living in slums" were now 6 times likelier than the national average to contract polio.
The reason was structural racism, poverty, and no national health-care system. But the CDC spokesman said too many people in such neighborhoods were "apathetic toward the vaccination program." Which of course he did, it's a racist country, but kinda takes my breath away
Polio history: After the successful field trial of Salk's vaccine was announced, the Eisenhower administration bowed to pressure from drug companies to let several firms mass-produce it at once, while failing to monitor their procedures closely to ensure safety. /1
One company screwed up and contaminated several lots of vaccine. As a result, dozens of kids got polio directly from that company's vaccines - and the crisis halted mass vaccination for over a year, so >25K more kids got polio from being unvaccinated for the 1955 polio season. /2
Meanwhile, in Canada, the government took over production from the outset, vaccine production was safe from the beginning, and everyone got vaccinated faster. /3
“Gaily Forward for the ERA”: I love this flyer aimed at gay men and lesbians promoting a 1980 rally for ERA ratification in Chicago’s Grant Park. Found it in a box of unprocessed ephemera at @GerberHart while researching Queer Clout. /1
What's striking is the detailed argument that the ERA matters for lesbians and gay men both separately and together. /2
Not just “Homophobia and sexism are two symptoms of the same disease” and “we must confront sexism as an issue within our own community as well as on the outside.” But also specific arguments tailored to address gay men and lesbians specifically. /3
Just did this online assignment and it worked well: "On the following pages are 12 covers of mainstream news magazines from the 1980s that are devoted to the HIV/AIDS crisis. (By mainstream, I mean that these are weekly, commercial newsmagazines aimed at a general audience.)"
"Choose three of the covers and look at them closely, taking into account the date. For each of the three covers, write a paragraph analysis of 2-4 sentences.
"To get you started, here are some questions to ask yourself: At what point in the early history of the AIDS epidemic was this document created? What is going onon the magazine cover? What images, colors, and words are used to represent the topic?
Attacking the #1619Project, historian Peter Coclanis says that lately “in its domestic coverage [the NYT] reads at times more like a Midtown edition of the Amsterdam News than a national newspaper of record.” It’s a strange, revealing turn of phrase. /1 spectator.us/1619-project-2…
The Amsterdam News, founded 1909, is one of the nation’s oldest Black-owned newspapers. Like its peers, it‘s declined in circulation and influence since the 1940s-60s—a time when Black journalists couldn’t get jobs at white-owned papers. /2
Does saying that the @nytimes reads “more like a Midtown edition of the Amsterdam News than a national newspaper of record” just mean it’s become too local, provincial? Obviously not. The Times is less focused on NYC than ever. /3
@KevinMKruse In the early 1950s, the State Department began systematically rooting out and firing gay and lesbian employees, on the theory that they were "security risks."
@KevinMKruse In 1953 President Eisenhower signed Executive Order 10450, which launched a purge of gay people from all federal government jobs