I really don’t wanna have an opinion on “bean dad”. Bu I don’t think I can avoid it, so here we go. A few thoughts.
1) I didn’t believe the story as written. The guy is a writer and clearly wanted it to seem dramatic and entertaining. There are probably many embellishments.
2) A lot of people are honing in on the fact that the kid didn’t eat for 6 plus hours. I think there is a big difference between kids that are food insecure going hungry and someone’s who’s well taken care of not eating for a while.
And again, I believe the story was embellished
3) What strikes me is not that there’s a problem with using a can opener as a “teachable moment” (I will never forgive Obama for saddling us with this). My problem is with the way this man, and many men, decide what “learning” has to look like.
It wasn’t about the can opener. It was about resilience and critical-thinking. I get that. But as many people dunking on this guy have pointed out, this is not a good way to teach those things. And yet so many men have been taught that it is.
There are tons of men piling into his mentions to support his “parenting”. And we can see clearly how this kind of patriarchal dysfunction is perpetuated.
They “teach” someone by withholding information and watching over them paternalistically as they struggle to develop from first principles something that should be easy and free. This is one of the ways men, and white men in particular, continually create the world we live in.
These men get things easily and for free *all the fucking time*. They rarely have to struggle or develop things from first principles. But they have developed this fiction in their heads that it’s how things *should* work. And they project it onto everyone else. All the time.
Men like to make everyone around them work harder than they did to get the same outcomes. They tell us they’re doing us a favor. They expect us to be grateful. And the whole experience is one entirely fabricated by them rather than being representative of how the world works.
Let me try to be more clear. I’m trying to get at something really important. These “dads” think getting information for free is “lazy”. They think it’s “valuable” to toil and struggle to figure things out that have already been figured out. Even though that is not *their* life.
It is this ideology and it’s pervasiveness that has a profound impact on our society. The reason we have to be so resilient and to be prepared to figure it out on your own is precisely because these “dads” work to *ensure* that this is how the world works. They make it so.
There’s a reason I couldn’t resist commenting on this even though I really tried. It was such a clear illustration of how things don’t have to be this way. The world doesn’t have to be harsh and unforgiving. It’s the choices that people make every day that turn it into that.
Teach your daughter to use a fucking can opener. Teach her that this is something we can take for granted because of the boundless ingenuity of human potential. Then teach her that she should find her own ways to contribute to human progress to make other people’s lives better.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Y’all know I’ve struggled with the whole “learn to code” movement. We’ve talked about how a lot of it has become scammy if not downright predatory. But I still maintain that it can be worth it to invest significant money to achieve a lucrative and sustainable career.
I’m trying to be careful how I talk about upward mobility these days. I’m rapidly progressing toward that age where I really understand what it’s like for people younger than me. And I can see that the world has changed a lot. But it’s worth discussing. The need is still there.
Speaking only about software tech careers, because that’s what I know. Our industry still has massive amounts of growth potential. I’ve talked about how we’ve actually failed to keep up with demand for new software. Getting into tech is still both desirable and achievable IMO.
I was gonna make a pithy comment about American's should be burning shit down. Then I remembered that there's absolutely no excuse for property damage no matter the circumstance. Everybody go home and write stern letters to your congressperson. I'm sure it'll work this time.
Because this is not really the time for subtly, let me be clear. The same indoctrination that makes white Americans support and justify the oppression of PoC is the same shit that is making you ineffectual in stopping your own oppression in this moment.
You let them take away all of your tools to fight back. Because they told you it might be used to help us, and you were afraid of that. Now you're sitting at home with your $600 while people call you lazy and tell you to just accept the death of your community as normal. Welcome.
Find quote tweets specifically is hard. They're just treated like regular tweets. Can't explicitly find people who have quote tweeted you as far as I know.
People who you've muted still show in search. Blocks have undefined rules. Sometimes they show, sometimes not. 😬
I’m pretty sure at least one of these recent hate follows is Marc Crouch on a burner account. The rest of them, I don’t know. But they are extra pissed that I asked a dude if he considered not being obnoxious.
There is a whole Twitter community here I think. A bunch of shitty dudes who think men are getting a bad wrap these days. Their daily Twitter topic is being pissed that some guy wasn’t allowed to live in obnoxious cluelessness. And eventually they show up to be mad at me about it
Most of them don’t make it through my content filters. I can’t even see them unless I go looking. There are probably way more than I think. Seriously, turn on your content filters.
Economics just isn't this simple. I wish that people who wanted to use this simple definition would admit that they're incentivized to do so because it benefits them in their current situation. It's okay. Just call it what it is.
Many employers are absolutely selling a lifestyle. Why does it make sense for an employer to upgrade their healthcare plan when the actual work hasn't changed? Because it's something their employees value and raises their standard of living. It makes the company more competitive.
Why does it make sense for a company to move to open a new office in a different location or even relocate the whole company. Part of the calculus is always that folks in that area will accept less money because they can still achieve a similar lifestyle there.
"...even with artificial intelligence and third-party moderators, the company was 'deleting less than 5% of all of the hate speech posted to Facebook.'" buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/ryanma…
"The implicit vision guiding most of our integrity work today is one where all human discourse is overseen by perfect, fair, omniscient robots owned by Mark Zuckerberg."
That's a hell of a sentence.
I was debating this with @operaqueenie. She says facebook is a big problem, but not the only problem. And I found myself making a very passionate case that, yes, Facebook is the *whole* problem. Not the tool per se, but the power it wields and how it wields that power.