Charity begins at home. Transparency is not achieved by blocking Twitter comments.
Not surprised a US think tank’s footsoldier takes aim at Indian pharma when Covaxin’s phase 3 has been successful on 22,000 volunteers with 4000 more to go. The assignment is to discredit India.
Not surprised a US think tank’s footsoldier takes aim at Indian pharma when Covaxin’s phase 3 has been successful on 22,000 volunteers with 4000 more to go. The assignment is to discredit India.
https://twitter.com/tanvi_madan/status/1346069669648719873
Phase 2 had more data than AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna. Phase 3 so far shows the vaccine is safe. Because it’s under trial, and a bulk of the testing has been done, it’s been recommended for emergency use only. The decisions are based on facts, not a random “trust me”. 
Covaxin showed safety, immunogenicity and efficacy in phase 2 data and safety in phase 3, and would be specifically used for emergencies arising from UK mutant strain. The vaccine is safe. It’s based on test results. Now, which part of the word “emergency” is difficult to get?
When the vaccine is known to be one of the safest in the world by a significant margin, where does the issue around transparency arise from? Lobbying on the behalf of American Big Pharma is disgraceful as it is, but pushing half truths and lies is even worse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
